[FRIAM] Agent-Based Modelling of a Blowback - How Terrorists are made
Marcus G. Daniels
mgd at santafe.edu
Tue Aug 8 09:57:57 EDT 2006
Jochen Fromm wrote:
> Although it is therefore obvious that a blowback can happen
> in this case, it would perhaps interesting to find out the
> circumstances when it happens exactly
There unintended consequences in many things, but that doesn't mean
individuals or nations can be expected not to protect their interests.
Most useful drugs have side effects, for example. Further, it's not
obvious what the world would look like today if somehow the Soviet Union
had survived and the many direct and covert actions the U.S. made to
undermine communism had never occurred.
My take is that leaders are not likely to abandon covert operations. So
either the autonomous organizations need to made non-autonomous (but
sufficiently anonymous), or they need to be quietly hunted down when
their work is done. Or, better, certain high risk approaches shouldn't
be taken at all without lots of agonizing by professionals on the long
term consequences (like with computer models). My guess is that many of
the people that come up with this stuff realize that the blowback make
take decades and by then their career will be done (esp. elected
officials). They'll have their glory and the collective memory will
fade about the how the pieces fit together.
Marcus
More information about the Friam
mailing list