[FRIAM] NYTimes.com: The Problems in Modeling Nature, With Its Unruly Nat...

[Phil Henshaw]

I've been curious about the change in the Times apparent politics.   I
think it's actually detaching itself from politics maybe, but in a
curious way.   I see more and more pieces that seem carefully crafted
for particular audiences, so that instead of having one voice that you
can get used to and know what to expect from, you now have more blush
pieces for targeted interests.     Their editorial positions are still
seem well researched, fair minded and practical, but the news is for
rent more and more of the time.     Anyone else notice that?   
 
 

Phil Henshaw                       ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
680 Ft. Washington Ave 
NY NY 10040                       
tel: 212-795-4844                 
e-mail: pfh at synapse9.com          
explorations: www.synapse9.com <http://www.synapse9.com/>     

-----Original Message-----
From: friam-bounces at redfish.com [mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com] On
Behalf Of PPARYSKI at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 2:10 PM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] NYTimes.com: The Problems in Modeling Nature,With
Its Unruly Nat...



Unfortunately, the NYT is no longer the newspaper it once was.  It's
reporting on the invasion, its justification and subsequent events is a
case in point.
 
Paul Paryski



  _____  

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at
<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redi
r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom> AOL.com. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20070301/faaa6fe5/attachment.html