[FRIAM] Friam Digest, Vol 61, Issue 16

[glen e. p. ropella]

Nicholas Thompson wrote:
> So, either the self is material,
> 
> Or, "in" is understood in some way other than that it occupies a
> container.

Yes, by "inner self", I was talking about Mikhail's latter "me".

Mikhail Gorelkin wrote:
> [second me] is the product of thinking of the first one (me as I
> think about me)

So, I do not intend "inner" to mean "inside a container".  I mean 
"inner" in the sense of the mental constructs we build when thinking 
about our selves. A model of our selves as viewed from within.

Both "me"s are part of the self, which is exactly the point I was trying 
to argue with Mikhail, neither the physical self nor this endo-self are 
less real than the other.

-- 
glen e. p. ropella, 971-219-3846, http://tempusdictum.com