[FRIAM] Wot's New, Doc? Plenty, Bugsy

[Owen Densmore]

On Nov 2, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:

> <snip>
> Despite our best efforts, I still think Crutchfield, for instance,  
> is ambiguous.

Nonsense!

> Note for instance how the different respondents to my question  
> understood him.

Then consider the fault theirs.

Anyone who really wants to reduce the ambiguity has but to read Ref[1]  
or any of Crutchfield/Shalizi papers on the topic.  Shalizi's thesis  
for example.

    -- Owen