[FRIAM] Quantum Theory Rebuilt From Simple Physical Principles | Quanta Magazine

[Gillian Densmore]

Mmm Neil DeGrasse Tysson,  and Guy Consolmagno talked about quantum
mechanics some on Nova (love watching that on youtube)
(LOL I still don't get it and asked help understanding it many people):
Basically the new guess is some how particles are actually just energy.
That energy goes reely reely fast so fast in fact it seems (to people like
me) that say a
beer cup at second street is solid. so can hold beer, great hardy food etc.
So what if (Elon Musk  and Brian Green) Ask: their's smaller and smaller
particles? are they  connected somehow?  and is it small and smaller untill
you get to  the qunatum (reel reely reeely small level)
Like possibly smaller even than a quark small.  I happily differ to others
as to if  Fermi lab  has been able to figure out how likely that might be.

Relativity is indeed very awsome ^_^  Einstein is awsome. I also LOVE
reading Hawkings stuff. He's recently asking a simillar question to me:
"Wait so were all made of star stuff and energy? How does that work" I
don't know. I love that I don't.

Isn't Quantum Energy guessing that at reely reely small levels what happens
between kinds of particles? And did they figure out why  this happens yet?
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/06/china-s-quantum-satellite-achieves-spooky-action-record-distance




On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Owen Densmore <owen at backspaces.net> wrote:

> Stephen will like this:
>
> Some researchers suspect that ultimately the axioms of a quantum
> reconstruction will be about information: what can and can’t be done with
> it. One such derivation of quantum theory based on axioms about information
> was proposed in 2010 by Chiribella, then working at the Perimeter
> Institute, and his collaborators Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano and Paolo Perinotti
> of the University of Pavia in Italy. “Loosely speaking,” explained Jacques
> Pienaar, a theoretical physicist at the University of Vienna, “their
> principles state that information should be localized in space and time,
> that systems should be able to encode information about each other, and
> that every process should in principle be reversible, so that information
> is conserved.” (In irreversible processes, by contrast, information is
> typically lost — just as it is when you erase a file on your hard drive.)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Owen Densmore <owen at backspaces.net>
> wrote:
>
>> This is kinda interesting:
>> ​  ​
>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-theory-rebuilt-from-
>> simple-physical-principles-20170830/
>>
>> ​Basically look at it like this:
>> - Relativity: Is founded on a few simple physical principles ​like the
>> limit on the speed of light.
>> - Quantum Theory: Is founded on equations that match observation.
>>
>> Both make sense. But QT hasn't that satisfying basis that relativity has.
>>
>> Apparently a bunch of folks are trying to fix that.
>>
>>    -- Owen
>>
>>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20170831/88af95c0/attachment.html>