[FRIAM] Is the new president mentally ill?

Grant Holland grant.holland.sf at gmail.com
Thu Jan 12 11:57:40 EST 2017


Eric,

It looks to me like you are missing what people like myself and Jochen 
are very afraid of - the extreme marginalization of certain classes of 
people versus other classes of people. And when I say "extreme", I mean 
extreme.

I grew up in the American South in the 1950s where lynchings of a 
certain class of people still occurred. That culture strictly forbade 
the pursuit of social and economic opportunity for that class, at the 
threat of beatings and death. And it was justified via an appeal to 
Christianity! For example, my mother (I'm a white guy) took over my 
Sunday school class in order to teach us (11 year old kids) that racism 
is Biblically justified. (She failed of course in her attempt at 
demonstrating that.)

So I know by experience that the danger of that kind of marginalization 
is real. (The propensity for a return to that world is alive and kicking 
even today in the deep South.) It is palpable and I recognize it in 
today's cultural and political manifestations.

I know that many of my friends who voted for Trump either think that I 
am simply a sore Hillary lover (I'm not really a fan of hers), or that 
I'm senselessly paranoid. But I think my fears are real and even 
probable. I'm way beyond mere disagreement. (That's where I was in 2000 
when W won.)

And I do not think that Jochen's fears are unjustified. Listen to him. 
You don't have to agree, but listen. He comes from a place that is fresh 
with the experience, and the consequences, of the real life 
manifestations of these phenomena. It happened, and Jochen knows what 
the tracks of that animal look like.

Thanks for listening to me!
Grant

On 1/12/17 6:07 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
> The comparison of Meryl Streep to Klemperer or von Galen seems more 
> baffling to me than the original conversation. As some on social media 
> have been pointing out, she stood in a room full of like minded 
> people, and spoke their collective mind, with no risk to her career or 
> her person. She didn't say anything not being chanted from the 
> rooftops by hundreds of thousands of other people, and said 
> publically, by prominent celebrities and members of the press every day.
>
> Are we really worried Meryl will be disappeared in the coming weeks, 
> and gassed? Are we worried she will be hit with false charges, 
> arrested without trial, and have her properties become forfeit to the 
> state? Are we even worried she might be blacklisted and never act 
> again? And even if she did, are we worried she won't be able to get by 
> in this world and support her family with the $75 million she already 
> has? Those are honest questions.
>
> Maybe I'm very confused about what "courageous" means. I would 
> consider the average BLM marcher, or women's march participant, more 
> courageous. They could be attacked by police or counter protesters, 
> they could be arrested, they could be fired from their jobs, they 
> could become ostracized by their communities, etc. Heck, Jill Stein 
> got herself arrested at Standing Rock and hardly anyone seemed to 
> notice. I'm not saying Meryl didn't give a good speech, or that it was 
> unimportant, but I honestly wonder what risk we really think she faces 
> as a result of that speech, which leads us to dub her act so 
> courageous, and to compare it to the actions of the other individuals 
> mentioned.
>
>
> -----------
> Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
> Supervisory Survey Statistician
> U.S. Marine Corps
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Jochen Fromm <jofr at cas-group.net 
> <mailto:jofr at cas-group.net>> wrote:
>
>     Meryl Streep reminds me of Clemens August Graf von Galen, who was
>     one of the few bishops that had the courage to criticize the Nazi
>     regime. He was a bishop in my hometown Münster near the Dutch
>     border. In his sermons he criticized that the Nazis were killing
>     innocent disabled people. The program was named T4. The Nazis let
>     him live because he was too popular among the people.
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemens_August_Graf_von_Galen
>     <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemens_August_Graf_von_Galen>
>
>     Many other priests and bishops were imprisoned by the Gestapo
>      (the secret state police) in concentration camps and died. In St.
>     Hedwig's cathedral in Berlin many of those are mentioned on
>     memorial plagues. While it may be futile to resist, those who have
>     the courage to do it are not forgotten.
>
>     It can also help to document the things that are unfolding, the
>     violations of human rights, the corruption, and the injustice. In
>     Dresden there was a Jewish professor Victor Klemperer who covered
>     the actions of the Nazi regime in his diaries and journals. He was
>     an important witness of all the injustice that happened.
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Klemperer
>     <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Klemperer>
>
>     -J.
>
>
>     -------- Original message --------
>     From: glen ☣ <gepropella at gmail.com <mailto:gepropella at gmail.com>>
>     Date: 1/12/17 02:07 (GMT+01:00)
>     To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>     <friam at redfish.com <mailto:friam at redfish.com>>
>     Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Is the new president mentally ill?
>
>
>     But the question is what actions are guided by remote diagnosis? 
>     I admit that I hope high visibility shaming like that from Streep,
>     when added to the rest of the stress he will be / has been under,
>     will make him go away.  But it's not likely for the same reasons
>     Steve cites that blame and stigma won't really work on him.
>
>     I suppose if we could really confirm that he's a particular type
>     of narcissist, then we could build models of what he may or may
>     not do and choose actions based on their expected efficacy.  But
>     because, almost by definition, everyone who willingly runs for
>     President is a narcissist of some sort or other and to differing
>     extent, that diagnosis isn't helpful.
>
>     Listening to the confirmation hearings is more helpful, I think. 
>     Take note of all the (many) issues where Trump and his appointees
>     express diametrically opposite positions.  Focus on those
>     fissures.  At best, his administration will shatter.  At worst,
>     the more distance you can put between the incompetent Cheeto and
>     the competent people surrounding him, the more likely we'll end up
>     with a Bush2 or a late-stage-Reagan ... maybe not good, but not
>     catastrophic.
>
>     On 01/11/2017 03:34 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
>     > Eric I believe you are wrong if you believe you can have a
>     narcissistic person on your site. A narcissist cares only for
>     himself. The policy of Trump boils down to "I'm great and you're
>     not unless you are like me, myself and I, you loser". There is no
>     way how he can make the country great again. As Paul Krugman said
>     America will turn into some form of authoritarianism, into a
>     Trumpistan nightmare at best.
>     > Mr. Trump does not only have a brand, he *is* a brand, a brand
>     that says "I'm great". If you stay in this Trump hotel you are
>     great. If you play on this Trump golf course you are great, too.
>     But it is just a facade. It is based on lies, and there is nothing
>     behind the shiny facade except emptiness. Therefore he seems to
>     hit back immediately if someone damages his image and his brand,
>     because he ceases to exist if his image is destroyed. He and his
>     brand have become undistinguishable.
>     > Marketing is no way to make America great again, Google has
>     already an OS for ads, and the American corporations excel in
>     marketing, especially the fast food chains. What will he do, build
>     a Trump hotel in every city, a Trump golf course in every national
>     park? This would be a total Trumpistan nightmare. Better than the
>     nuclear apocalypse, but who would want such a future...
>
>
>     -- 
>     ☣ glen
>
>     ============================================================
>     FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>     Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>     to unsubscribe
>     http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>     <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
>     FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>     <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> by Dr. Strangelove
>
>     ============================================================
>     FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>     Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>     to unsubscribe
>     http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>     <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
>     FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>     <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> by Dr. Strangelove
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20170112/64de01bc/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list