[FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

[Gary Schiltz]

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Eric Charles <
eric.phillip.charles at gmail.com> wrote:

> If I was in a field that used ArXiv, and didn't secretly like the idea
> of lay people and students sometimes reading my work, I wouldn't be on
> either. But psychology doesn't do ArXiv, and I do secretly like those ideas.
>

I'm curious why you say that you "secretly" like the idea of lay people and
students reading your work. Is there some taboo among psychologists against
non-professionals reading professional scientific articles?


> Our article on MOTH has 62 reads through Research Gate and 4 through
> Academia (via my upload).
>

I may have missed part of the thread, but what does MOTH stand for? Or are
you talking about the psychology of the night time equivalent of
butterflies? A la
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-strong/201404/what-the-military-can-learn-the-peppered-moth
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20170510/71719abd/attachment.html>