[FRIAM] are we how we behave?

[glen ∅]

But, again, you're adding judgment and evaluative capabilities that seem to require some kind of understanding of the components involved.  How would a car-ignorant person know that a Lyft ride from Santa Fe to Tesuque might involve some risk of, say, dying of exposure?  We can assume they'd have some cultural/traditional experience that most Lyft cars are relatively new and clean. (Or that ballerinas don't typically hang out where guns are needed.)  And that might bridge the boundary between a [non]security issue.  But, again, this is not "to relate".  It's to solve a particular problem, whether or not that problem was implicitly solved by infrastructure (aka cultural tendencies).

On 3/7/19 1:46 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> There are security issues and there are non-security issues.   When it comes to plausible risk scenarios, one can invest in a common pool and as opposed to another specialized pool.   A ballerina that knows how to handle a gun, say.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pEpkey.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 2448 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20190307/de961813/attachment.bin>