[FRIAM] if by 'populism' he meant ...

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Glen, 

I think what is happening here is that, as is your wont, you have managed to make clear to us all that none us have a clue what populism is, including, perhaps, your self.  I know you didn't ask for any more definitions, but how about this one:  "Being guided in your choice of policies primarily by the roar of the crowd in front of you.  Or the twitter feed." 

Nick 

Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of ? glen
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2020 10:08 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] if by 'populism' he meant ...

I've read plenty of formulations of what it is. And I'm familiar enough with Long. What I want are criticisms of formulations. If you're not willing to criticize my formulation, then perhaps you could write a counterpoint and explain why Long was NOT populist? But I definitely encourage donations to Wikipedia. I gave them $50 this year.

On December 24, 2020 5:43:27 AM PST, Frank Wimberly <wimberly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long
>

--
glen ⛧

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/