[FRIAM] detritus from vFRIAM

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

In other words, there is some sense in which the notion of Self-serving
Action is incoherent. 

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: thompnickson2 at gmail.com <thompnickson2 at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 1:07 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: detritus from vFRIAM

 

I tried to post this on the vFRIAM chat, but wouldn't "take", so I am
posting it here: 

 

"Don't do this now, but .. as a favor to me, could you-guys devote some of
your shaving time this week to the proposition: "No system ever acts on its
own behalf."  My intuition is that whenever we investigate a system that
appears to act in its own behalf, we will find that it is pursuing a goal
that is short of the interest of the whole, but which will produce benefits
to the whole because of some property of the world in which it acts.  I
would love to hear a discussion among people trying to design a system that
acts on its own behalf. Can someone come up with a simple example of such a
system."  

 

I grant you that the question is not clear.

 

Thanks, 

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> 

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200703/bcc249fe/attachment.html>