[FRIAM] invoking quantum woo (was Book publishing advice needed)

[∄ uǝlƃ]

I think that's the essence of Jon's idea. But there is a refinement we could make. Oracles don't have to be embodied in a person(ality). In some ways, Gisin's idea of distant digits in real numbers or a random process are non-personal oracles by some definition. Deterministic sensitivity to initial conditions and fractal dimension might be other members of the same class.

On 7/8/20 7:12 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> But maybe it's exactly the inexplicability which is the secret sauce, that there is something ineffable about the quantum physics.
> 
> -- rec --
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:51 AM ∄ uǝlƃ <gepropella at gmail.com <mailto:gepropella at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     5) evocation of the shaman/oracle archetype

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ