[FRIAM] alternative response

[Frank Wimberly]

I *knew* it was an election!

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 3:43 PM <thompnickson2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Somebody once said that Psychology is the discipline that explores the
> contradictions between the first and the third person point of view.  I can
> see that.  However, if I am to decide which side of the contradiction to
> privilege, I would choose the third person point of view.  After all, there
> billions of you and only one of me.
>
>
>
> N
>
>
>
> Nicholas Thompson
>
> Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
>
> Clark University
>
> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Marcus Daniels
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 14, 2020 2:57 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] alternative response
>
>
>
> Would you ask a Facebook image labeling algorithm how it converts a
> picture into a name?
>
> If I were to try to write a set of bots to reproduce FRIAM conversations,
> I’d probably do it with an agent-based approach, and dump my mental model
> of each person into a program, and then run the programs together, like a
> sort of core-war game.
>
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_War
>
>
>
> I think the dynamics of this game would be predictable sometimes, and
> other times it would have long transients.  Other times idiosyncratic word
> associations would redirect the conversation in unexpected directions.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure what you are asking.  It seems like you see the reflection on
> behavior as different from behavior.   To me it is all just behavior based
> on different inputs and types of outputs.
>
>
>
> *From: *Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> on behalf of Russ Abbott <
> russ.abbott at gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"Russ.Abbott at gmail.com" <russ.abbott at gmail.com>, The Friday
> Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, June 14, 2020 at 1:30 PM
> *To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [FRIAM] alternative response
>
>
>
> Marcus,  That's a very fancy description. How did you come up with it? And
> how did you find the words to express it?
>
>
>
> -- Russ Abbott
> Professor, Computer Science
> California State University, Los Angeles
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 1:12 PM Jon Zingale <jonzingale at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> For what it is worth, I am not even sure we will come to agree
> on the best way to describe the physics of the natural world.
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Frank Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200614/1d9c6d8a/attachment.html>