[FRIAM] falsifying the lost opportunity updating mechanism for free will

[Frank Wimberly]

In causal reasoning a system has the Markov property if given that
a->b->c->d you only need to know the value of c to know the
probability density of the values of d.  x->y means that x is a cause of y.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:22 PM Jon Zingale <jonzingale at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, exogenous is better. It seems like we are in agreement that something
> higher-order is needed, an algebra or otherwise. In regards to truncation,
> I
> am again thinking about the Gisin paper and staying open to the idea that
> we
> wouldn't need to amend the model but rather the underlying logic to
> accommodate. Whatever model we choose, a truncation property is likely to
> be
> unsatisfying over a boolean topos and without developing a concept like
> computational observability. For now, I am thinking of truncation
> interpretation as a separate problem.
>
> I will have to think more carefully about your point regarding
> distributions
> and the Markov property. I am not sure that the model is Markovian in that
> there is memory bound up in the stigmergy.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Frank Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20200622/0f90a648/attachment.html>