[FRIAM] Warring Darwinians for Glen, Steve

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

G

I agree that the problem is the same as the problem of working out what your point of view would be from where you are standing.  If that is a hard problem for you, I trust your judgement, for the moment, until more evidence is in, that its hard for you. However,  it doesn’t seem hard for me, although, if further evidence were presented to me, I might be convinced otherwise. 

Do we agree on what sort of evidence would be required to convince you that the problem is easy for you or me that the problem is hard for me?
N

Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ?
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:25 PM
To: FriAM <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Warring Darwinians for Glen, Steve

Excellent! So you *do* understand the hard problem. 

On 5/1/20 1:13 PM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
> I can't see any substantive difference in our positions.  ''So, let's just say, for the purposes of argument that I'm right, and move on."


--
☣ uǝlƃ

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/