[FRIAM] numbers

Mon Nov 2 14:27:34 EST 2020

Thanks, Glen, I think the relevant data line was POP100, although I don't know why "100".  In a  sane world, that would be the population in hundreds, but that would give our zip code a population of 4.5 million, which seems a bit  heavy.  In any case, for those of  you following case increments by zip code, here are some denominators as of 2010, as well as the most recent per day 7 day increments. .  The second two columns are deviation are expectation and deviation.  No surprises there, except that there seems to be a bit of a run of cases out by the golf course.  507 has a third more cases than it should have, which demonstrates once again that it's better for your health to be rich than poor.  Caveat emptor: these calculations were done literally on the back of an envelope by an 82 year old guy with poor eyesight and C's in math.  

501 - 15,147  - 13% - 02.3c - 4  -

505 - 31,013  - 25% - 06.0   - 8  -

506 - 12, 580 - 09% - 05.5   - 3 +

507 - 45, 890 - 38% - 18.0   - 12 ++

508 - 18, 183 - 15% - 01.5  -  5 -

Nick 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 12:08 PM
To: FriAM <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] numbers

And if you don't want to download a huge file, you can use the census web app:

E.g. for my zip code (98502):

https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/arcgis/rest/services/TIGERweb/PUMA_TAD_TAZ_UGA_ZCTA/MapServer/7/query?where=ZCTA5%3D%2798502%27&text=&objectIds=&time=&geometry=&geometryType=esriGeometryEnvelope&inSR=&spatialRel=esriSpatialRelIntersects&relationParam=&outFields=*&returnGeometry=false&returnTrueCurves=false&maxAllowableOffset=&geometryPrecision=&outSR=&returnIdsOnly=false&returnCountOnly=false&orderByFields=&groupByFieldsForStatistics=&outStatistics=&returnZ=false&returnM=false&gdbVersion=&returnDistinctValues=false&resultOffset=&resultRecordCount=&queryByDistance=&returnExtentsOnly=false&datumTransformation=&parameterValues=&rangeValues=&f=html

I'd say this is an excellent example of government transparency.

On 11/2/20 9:08 AM, Barry MacKichan wrote:

> One of the first search hits is 

>  <https://www.kaggle.com/census/us-population-by-zip-code> https://www.kaggle.com/census/us-population-by-zip-code 

> < <https://www.kaggle.com/census/us-population-by-zip-code> https://www.kaggle.com/census/us-population-by-zip-code>

> —Barry

> 

> On 2 Nov 2020, at 11:59,  <mailto:thompnickson2 at gmail.com> thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:

> 

>     Is it possible to get population by zipcode?  It seems like it’s 

> proprietary info.

> 

>      

> 

>     How’s that for government transparency!

--

↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

archives:  <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/> http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

FRIAM-COMIC  <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20201102/07696436/attachment.html>