[FRIAM] Getting You Libertarians' Goats

[Steve Smith]

Glen -

Thanks for the reminder to keep on supporting local/independent if you
want them to be around later.  Or because they are your neighbors.  Or
of course, if you just want to stick it to Bezos like the Lilliputians
that we are!

I didn't know about this resource.   I have degenerated to routing all
of my orders through Op Cit which moved to De Vargas from SanBusco. 
They try very hard to find and obtain any title and have offered Mary
that they will also add her wish list to theirs and pull books she is
looking for as they find them (they have a big backlog of unsorted and
get more every day in trade) rather than order.  

They don't seem to be registered with Bookshop, nor does Big Star...  
I'll follow up and see why maybe not.

- Steve

On 9/14/20 8:30 AM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:
> And just in case you want to avoid enriching super villains like Bezos:
>
> https://bookshop.org/books/bonds-of-civility/9780521601153
> https://bookshop.org/books/the-taming-of-the-samurai-honorific-individualism-and-the-making-of-modern-japan-revised/9780674868090
>
> And the book Steve shared:
> https://bookshop.org/books/blackfoot-physics-a-journey-into-the-native-american-worldview/9781578633715
>
> On 9/13/20 6:52 PM, Carl Tollander wrote:
>> Yes to Ikegami's "Bonds of Civility"and her other book "Taming of the Samurai".
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 4:14 PM David Eric Smith <desmith at santafe.edu <mailto:desmith at santafe.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>     This idea of places where people of different walks “encounter each other” — or even better have something meaningful to do with each other, has an interesting role at a certain period of social change in Japan.
>>
>>     From a friend and colleague:
>>     https://www.amazon.com/Bonds-Civility-Aesthetic-Political-Structural/dp/0521601150
>>     The author argues that the creation of “publics” was an important social innovation in getting around the codified barriers in an officially feudal society, de facto before it was possible de jure.
>