[FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Ah, Marcus.  I can see already that you are afflicted with duonormative thinking. 

n

Nick Thompson
ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 3:00 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf

Whether it is Shalizi's criticism of Wolfram or `deconstruction' of the scientific community, my reaction is that the universe doesn't give a damn how humans struggle in groups or individually to understand, and whether credit assignment is fair or not.   How an insight was gained is what matters -- what was effectively the learning algorithm in use and the evidence at the time that led to the model -- not who happened to experience it or their preferred pronouns. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of David Eric Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 12:51 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf

Just had a very strange physiological experience.

Last evening when this came in, I read a few pages.  Since it is all irony, snark, and preening, I assumed it is some flavor of post-modernism.

Spent 1-2mins reading the abstract that says it invokes Bohr, and violates (as nearly as one can tell) whatever Bohr actually thought.  i.e., to shit on the modern as a declaration of disrespect toward it, which would be the one defining property of Pomo.

Then I tried to read the first paragraph of the wikipedia page Glen sent.  Had this strange sense of dizziness and disintegration, which made me wonder if I had had some kind of localized stroke or siezure.

Stopped reading the wikipedia page, and it all vanished immediately.

This stuff really works!

Eric



> On Apr 30, 2021, at 12:45 AM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Though I can't parse Barad, herself, I do like agential realism: 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agential_realism
> 
> And this criticism seems useful:
> 
> Barad, Bohr, and quantum mechanics
> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-021-03160-1
> 
> On 4/29/21 3:31 AM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
> 
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn
> GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailm
> an%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,OBJnaXtA2fUwlA805VU2Kt5563kLiO
> 7jDgFg9s5tJiAKYFQ1xKZQxPFYdrfbAzQmRoTTQzWxx3G1vL-0cRV_ryzZyexFuQ0WCUMo
> 4intBx4s-ABxeC2tQQ,,&typo=1 FRIAM-COMIC 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspo
> t.com%2f&c=E,1,xnJ0Hi8rrwFDgbfh_CYnCEqxWQIwtOa5FzbgKSm02lwTbhjNln5sTOR
> ldz7wngn6BjhnvK_hZkBEukt48Xv6hiLinbgZgkjGSqcjOz6eIneWUF0a3g,,&typo=1
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/


- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/