[FRIAM] what complexity science says ...

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Right  exactly.  But the hearing aid is BEFORE the cochlea.  So if hearing
aids are crap, it must be because they do something to the sound that the
cochea cannot adjust to.  So, in Mike's absence, land with the help of
Frank's diagram, let's take this step by step.  The sound enters the
external ear and knocks on the tympanic membrane. The membrane, in turn
operates the tiny bones of the stapes, which in turn compress the inner
membrane.   So in what way is a digitized, analysed sound ill suited to what
happens next. 

N

Nick Thompson
ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of jon zingale
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 8:39 AM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] what complexity science says ...

If I remember correctly, this wasn't Mike's argument. It was *not* a
question of sampling rate nor one of range. Instead, I believe, it had to do
with architecture, the Spatio-temporal relationship that the neurons at the
cochlea have to one another, and the training our nervous system undergoes
when we are young to make sense of this data.



--
Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/