[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[uǝlƃ ☤>$]

Hm. Let's try again:

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-sterilize-our-womenfolk-take-2/
"No, the Japanese biodistribution study shows nothing of the sort. It only looked at where the lipid nanoparticles go."

Do you have evidence that the spike protein, or the mRNA that codes for it, ends up in the ovaries of HUMANS? If so, you win the argument. If not, then what are you arguing about?



On 6/18/21 2:26 PM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
> Just to continue; "your" article mainly addresses "antivaxxers". By no stretch of the imagination can dr Robert Malone be categorized as an "antivaxxer". He is the inventor of mRNA vaccination technology. He works in this field, his purpose in life is to promote things very much associated with vaccinations. It is very much against his self-interest to point out limitations in mRNA vaccination technology. 
> 
> My answer to your specific question is: if you connect the dots of dr Robert Malone's explanations and you try to connect the dots of the explanations in "your" article, I find his explanations more convincing.
> 
> I really don't have a problem if your connecting of the dots leads to a different conclusion.
> 
> Unless you come up with a good reason to refute this, I'm not going to discuss this further. How many times must we agree to disagree?

-- 
☤>$ uǝlƃ