[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[Marcus Daniels]

Remember that the spike proteins are anchored on the cells and that it isn’t resulting in replication.   It isn’t clear what the y axis refers to.

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Pieter Steenekamp
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 10:01 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

Thank you Marcus.

It seems like the authors of the study report you referenced and dr Robert Malone worked from the same data. See attached png file of a screenshot I made of the video where he discussed this issue.

It's just that they came to different conclusions. The authors of the report you referenced are not concerned about it whilst dr Robert Malone is very concerned.

From my perspective it's okay if based on this information, and obviously in the context of much other information, you are not concerned and I am.

Pieter

On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 23:57, Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com<mailto:marcus at snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
On page 47 a radioactive marker was used to track the mRNA, and < 0.1 % were found in the ovaries and adrenal glands.  1% was found in the spleen.   Some was circuited in the plasma, and that ends up in the liver (21.5%) where enzymes chew it up.

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com<mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com>> On Behalf Of Pieter Steenekamp
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 2:27 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com<mailto:friam at redfish.com>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

Just to continue; "your" article mainly addresses "antivaxxers". By no stretch of the imagination can dr Robert Malone be categorized as an "antivaxxer". He is the inventor of mRNA vaccination technology. He works in this field, his purpose in life is to promote things very much associated with vaccinations. It is very much against his self-interest to point out limitations in mRNA vaccination technology.

My answer to your specific question is: if you connect the dots of dr Robert Malone's explanations and you try to connect the dots of the explanations in "your" article, I find his explanations more convincing.

I really don't have a problem if your connecting of the dots leads to a different conclusion.

Unless you come up with a good reason to refute this, I'm not going to discuss this further. How many times must we agree to disagree?

On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 23:03, Pieter Steenekamp <pieters at randcontrols.co.za<mailto:pieters at randcontrols.co.za>> wrote:
dr Robert Malone explains how the Covid vaccine acts totally different than expected and different than all other vaccines. When a person gets vaccinated with other vaccines, there is a little bit of invection in the upper arm and the immune system kicks in, with "all the action" taking place in the area of the upper arm. On the other hand, with the Covid vaccine the vaccine particles, very unexpectedly, travels through the who;e body and "the action" is not limited to the upper arm area. Specifically a large concentration happens in the ovaries and that scares him very much.
"Your" article reads like an "activists" article. Dr Malone's explanation sounds to me like a serious scientists

On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 22:44, ⛧ glen <gepropella at gmail.com<mailto:gepropella at gmail.com>> wrote:
OK. What part of Malone's claims are not debunked? Again, I'm having trouble knowing what you're talking about because you won't be specific.

I'm fine with disagreeing. But I have no idea what we disagree about!


On June 18, 2021 12:36:28 PM PDT, Pieter Steenekamp <pieters at randcontrols.co.za<mailto:pieters at randcontrols.co.za>> wrote:
>Thank you Glen,
>
>I reread the article you posted
>https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-sterilize-our-womenfolk-take-2/
>and then I listened to where dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA
>vaccination technology discusses the potential harm of the Covid
>vaccines:
>The long discussion has been removed, but the following two clips are
>still
>available:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4 and
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY
>
>After reviewing this I came to the following conclusion:
>a) I 100% agree with "your" article in that it debunks many of the wild
>conspiracy theories. Thanks for this
>b) In "my" video clips, dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA
>vaccination
>technology, discusses carefully the potential harm of specifically the
>Covid vaccines. Refer to https://www.rwmalonemd.com/ for more about
>him. I
>don't find convincing arguments against these specific points in "your"
>article.
>
>Let me repeat, I am a VERY BIG fan of vaccinations in general and
>specifically of the mRNA vaccination technology. I am really excited
>about
>the potential benefits to humanity of this technology in that it could,
>in
>future, have effective vaccines available against viruses very soon
>after a
>new virus has been identified. Vaccinations have saved many lives the
>last
>half-century or so and mRNA vaccination technology could take the fight
>against virus infections even further.
>
>We all are confronted with data and information and we have to use our
>own
>judgement about what makes sense for ourselves. If you believe "your"
>article debunked what dr. Robert Malone said, fine, I am definitely not
>going to argue with you or try to change your mind.
>
>In my judgement, on the other hand, I don't find convincing arguments
>in
>"your" article debunking what Dr Robert Malone said.
>
>Again, I really appreciate your comments and I really do consider it,
>in
>general I value your judgement, but in this specific case I disagree
>with
>you. But at the end of the day we don't have to agree on how we
>interpret
>the information.
>
>Just on the cost, I was not referring to what it costs me personally. I
>was
>referring to the billions of dollars in taxpayers money big pharma got
>to
>develop the vaccines and the killing they now make to sell it to
>governments.
>
>About stirring the pot, in general I like to do exactly that, yes,
>guilty
>as charged. But in this specific case I am serious about seeking help.
>But
>please don't crucify me if we come to different conclusions on being
>presented with the same information. We can agree to disagree in a very
>positive spirit.
>

--
glen ⛧

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210619/7d9be8c4/attachment.html>