[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[Pieter Steenekamp]

Just one more thing, thanks for the link showing my hero our president
Cyril Ramaphosa. I think (if you'll forgive a possible little bit of bias)
he is the best current head of government of all countries in the world!

On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 19:55, Pieter Steenekamp <pieters at randcontrols.co.za>
wrote:

> Thanks for the comment Glen. I might well have erred in claiming that my
> criticism is also valid for traditional vaccines and not only mRNA
> vaccines. I'll check this, and, to be honest, I sincerely hope you are
> right and I made a mistake on this one.
>
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 19:43, uǝlƃ ☤>$ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The y axis seems to be in "Total Lipid concentration (μg lipid
>> equivalent/g [or mL])" from the table in the Japanese study. But the
>> percentages data would make more sense to me. Attached is a log plot
>> showing the percentages per tissue at 48h.
>>
>> Obviously, anyone concerned with this result should get a more
>> traditional COVID19 vaccine: J&J, AstraZenica, Novavax, Merk, Sputnik V,
>> etc. Pieter's citation of this data as part of a claim that alternative
>> prophylactics like ivermectin are *better* than the TRADITIONAL vaccines is
>> just confused.
>>
>>
>> https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/jj-send-2-million-covid-19-vaccine-doses-safrica-by-end-june-president-ramaphosa-2021-06-15/
>>
>> On 6/19/21 7:56 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> > Remember that the spike proteins are anchored on the cells and that it
>> isn’t resulting in replication.   It isn’t clear what the y axis refers to.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Pieter
>> Steenekamp
>> > *Sent:* Friday, June 18, 2021 10:01 PM
>> > *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
>> friam at redfish.com>
>> > *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid
>> vaccinations
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you Marcus.
>> >
>> > It seems like the authors of the study report you referenced and dr
>> Robert Malone worked from the same data. See attached png file of a
>> screenshot I made of the video where he discussed this issue.
>> >
>> > It's just that they came to different conclusions. The authors of the
>> report you referenced are not concerned about it whilst dr Robert Malone is
>> very concerned.
>> >
>> > From my perspective it's okay if based on this information, and
>> obviously in the context of much other information, you are not
>> concerned and I am.
>>
>> --
>> ☤>$ uǝlƃ
>> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210619/eebddc77/attachment.html>