[FRIAM] (no subject)

[David Eric Smith]

Hi Glen,

Thank you, and yes, I did submit it somewhere.  There are a couple of different evolution journals where this kind of subject is published.  They all have length limits — 140 characters or something like that — which this thing exceeds.  I don’t even remember which of them I sent to, because their formats turn out to be quite similar.  Mostly I was trying to get it before the eyes of a couple of people whom I hope the editor will ask as reviewers, who I think will immediately understand what the move is, because it is so close to where they have already come, and that they will agree that it is a kind of natural completion of what Price and also they were trying to do.  After that the editor will reject it, but I can ask for advice on whether there is anyplace it could be published, without violating the conditions of review.  

I am horrible at timeliness on reviews, and during COVID, everyone else has become uncommonly bad as well.  So it could be years before I hear anything.  I have another paper that is now out for about 30 months to a Springer journal; this one has only been out maybe 8 or 10 months.

Many thanks,

Eric


> On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:02 PM, ⛧ glen <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That paper is positively pornographic! Well done.
> 
> If I understand what you're doing, which I most likely don't, the mechanized graphs are an excellent example of some rhetoric I'm currently trying to foist on some unwilling victims (re the "languages" within which we couch hypotheses, and how "language" choice sets a frame/paradigm).
> 
> But they're academics. And I am not. So I'd like to confirm that you've submitted it somewhere, regardless of your expectations of acceptance? I don't need to know where. If so, I'll feel more confident in encouraging them to read it.
> 
> 
> On March 24, 2021 4:46:23 PM PDT, David Eric Smith <desmith at santafe.edu> wrote:
>> I will claim that part of the problem is a bad problem in conceptual
>> delineation in much (not all!) of the community, which the terminology
>> canalizes and makes it hard to escape from.  For part of that I do have
>> something I think is a corrective.  I don’t know if it will ever be
>> accepted anywhere, so I put it on the BioRxiv here:
>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.biorxiv.org%2fcontent%2f10.1101%2f2021.02.09.430402v1.abstract&c=E,1,BJI4v-sKlAKG9TTqIjaeaWW0r---JGH7j68TIOfK62NVQsDk3M1v4LKlGLHYHYl0IGS6JpyKBEFpWW760HkvNqZI01T4whPz2owBEjJEDEpvH3wrgQ,,&typo=1
>> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.biorxiv.org%2fcontent%2f10.1101%2f2021.02.09.430402v1.abstract&c=E,1,PiNnB4Mea11E3NbOf1J9kiBNwaJm_D356Z9AK-rtlkWlamy0uIN4X23SortvEWwhFmu1adf-m6N63uM8CxTaVIkw5JBVfpjNgjmV75TSNav8oe1eXG9LRLs,&typo=1>
>> 
>> 
> -- 
> glen ⛧
> 
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,jTkiNMZtdQ1uNqOsVnezyRqbHe-SxTXmI7D0UmwuSZmJksmhwyT1RoofiMlOyCY9q-0d5D_h3dyKSsv5RUSFglIPv0Pj_zL1w4SNsDHwA4OszTHloi0,&typo=1
> FRIAM-COMIC https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,I8djZZhjllB6yqRk0T7k-_DDIplJhDVZ4ie8WYfAIh4ZftwbrEKTuDhxEo--QOaeyx_2OruXXU3fk0n8aI2k6lY4a3Uk_CggHgtg0faoO30ShqfyTkSMVTgcv3s,&typo=1
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/