[FRIAM] The case for universal basic income UBI

[Pieter Steenekamp]

Okay, I'm happy with that. It's just that on UBI we probably have very
similar views. I also agree with the views expressed by the psychologytoday
reference you gave above about You Are Not Your Work.

But, maybe my reading of your comments are wrong? Do you support UBI?


On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 18:39, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

> OK. Well, if Andrew were here, I'd be happy to discuss it with him. But
> he's not and you are.
>
> The link you sent is to Ben Shapiro's brand marketing channel. Anyone who
> wants Ben Shapiro to make more money, please watch it and hit those like
> and subscribe buttons. 8^D
>
> On 5/4/21 9:24 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
> > @Glen, I'm a supporter of UBI and mentioned a couple of points I came
> across from people that're against it. I don't claim to have all the
> answers and I am open to listen to the arguments of those against
> it, that's why I mentioned them, but I don't support those claims so I'm
> not going to defend them.
> >
> > The whole point of my post was that Andrew Yang answered the
> criticism against UBI much better than what I can. What I hoped would
> happen was that somebody would listen to the views expressed by Andrew Yang
> and we then discuss that.
> >
> > It's fine by me if you don't want to listen to Andrew Yang as
> interviewed by this other guy (who's he again?, I just forgot his name),
> but then you miss the point of my post completely.
>
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210504/8702044a/attachment.html>