[FRIAM] Newborn Heart Rate

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Just to be clear – and perhaps nerdishly literal minded – I would NEVER claim that word play alone is science; I would only claim that it has a role to play. 

 

n

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Saturday, October 2, 2021 6:28 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Newborn Heart Rate

 

On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 10:59 AM <thompnickson2 at gmail.com <mailto:thompnickson2 at gmail.com> > wrote:

 You might help me distinguish between vicious DAWW and virtuous DAWW.  You might exile me.  But you probably won’t get me to stop. 


If we follow the virtuous DAWW, it feels like wuwei  <https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=c%3A%2A%E6%97%A0%E4%B8%BA%2A&wdrst=0> science to me. Who needs action <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_(physics)>  when you got words? We are but meat puppets playing with nirvana <https://youtu.be/Sj8UbmdV7bk?t=53> .

Exile you? Never. Will we ex-Hume your body of words? Kant tell.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20211002/e7d14385/attachment-0001.html>