[FRIAM] stygmergy, CA's, and [biological] development

Marcus Daniels marcus at snoutfarm.com
Mon Oct 25 12:04:10 EDT 2021


Could be.  But isn’t it obvious that writing a CA in some imperative language requires less hand wringing?    What is the payoff?   So much of this stuff ends up coming across as “Look you can do the thing you already knew how to do!”  What can I do that I couldn’t do before?

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Barry MacKichan
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 8:52 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] stygmergy, CA's, and [biological] development


Aha! I think the exercise here was to come up with a categorical statement.
—Barry

On 25 Oct 2021, at 10:19, Marcus Daniels wrote:

It is hard to find the motivation to invest much in category theory when the practical considerations are left as an exercise to the reader.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20211025/ad08ed25/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list