[FRIAM] Liberal dilemmas

[Frank Wimberly]

Yeah, cowboys mostly do the same things in the same way as always.

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021, 4:34 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:

> Welfare ranchers, indeed.   The rest of us have to constantly modernize
> our skills..  But freeloading off the public land and environment that’s
> “multigenerational” and must be preserved?  Why?
>
>
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Frank Wimberly
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 1, 2021 3:17 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Liberal dilemmas
>
>
>
> I owned 40 acres in Torrance County, NM which was adjacent to a national
> forest.  Ranchers were charged $1.21 per acre per year to use the NF land
> for grazing.  I could have made $48 per year by charging a little less than
> the feds.  My property taxes were $40 per year.
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021, 1:50 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> wrote:
>
> Dave wrote:
>
> < More significant: I have had my curricular materials censured and have
> had my job threatened on a number of occasions because it was deemed
> inconsistent with liberal values. Ironically, many of these events occurred
> when I was teaching at a Catholic university where I could, with impunity,
> challenge religious orthodoxy, but not liberal woke snowflake orthodoxy. I
> was once censured by the University of Wisconsin HR department because a
> female student filed a sexual harassment complaint because I had a meeting
> with her in my office where I had three Salvador Dali prints on my wall and
> "she was forced to look at breasts the entire meeting." Her complaint was
> upheld because neither the content of the Dali prints nor my intent or
> rational for having them in my office mattered — only her subjective
> feelings. At Highlands I was forbidden to offer Honors courses or any
> opportunities to earn extra credit in a class by tackling extra hard
> problems (these were software courses) because doing so was racist and
> unfair — simply because more non-Hispanic students obtained the extra
> credit or the honors designation. >
>
> So the university had the expectation that before advanced classes could
> be offered, there needed to an unbiasing of the candidate pool for those
> classes by adequately training everyone (every demographic) that was
> potentially feeding in to them?  Ok.  If the university wants to do this,
> or incentivized to do this, it is really just a matter of private/public
> strategy.   If you don't want to work for a university that has this "fair"
> strategy, then don't.    As for subjecting young students to strange
> imagery, I can see why one would not want to do that.  Just as it would
> strange for a female professor to dress like a hooker.   Organizations can
> have dress codes.   Don't be a fool, universities are just another kind of
> business.  You mess with the business, you will have a problem.  It would
> be better if your department heads were "upstanders" and just said, "Hey
> Dave, how is this art helping your students?"
>
> < Not personal, but a relative: multi-generational ranch with Federal
> grazing right. Hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years were spent
> enhancing the Federal land, containment ponds for water that reduced
> erosion and flash flooding without diminishing runoff contribution to
> watershed; planting of native grasses, elimination of  deadwood, etc. etc.
> End result was the ability to safely and sustainably graze X number of
> cattle. About five years ago, BLM issued a new policy dictating the maximum
> carrying capacity of Federal lands. The math was based on lowest common
> denominator. The policy was, at the behest of preservation groups, written
> with the specific intent to minimize and eventually eliminate the use of
> public lands for grazing. (Also mining and motorized recreational vehicle
> use.) Bottom line, allotment was taken away because it violated the numbers
> — not because there was any evidence of actual harm. >
>
> I'm a taxpayer.  Why should I want off road vehicles or cows on federal
> land?  I don't care about either of those things.   This is a weird
> entitlement that these folks have in mind.  As far as I was concerned the
> Bundy principals in Oregon deserved to be met by A-10s.
>
> Marcs
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210901/0af252ee/attachment.html>