<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Some say entanglement is related to spacetime itself. There was a Quanta magazine article about it recently.</div><div>https://www.quantamagazine.org/time-entanglement-raises-quantum-mysteries-20160119/</div><div><br></div><div>-Jochen</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Marcus Daniels <marcus@snoutfarm.com> </div><div>Date: 1/12/19 20:42 (GMT+01:00) </div><div>To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [FRIAM] models, reality, etc. </div><div><br></div></div>Entanglement is probabilistic: Look for a dot at some location, if you see one, then there's a probability of seeing another dot at another location, and a different probability if you don't. <br><br>On 1/12/19, 11:53 AM, "Friam on behalf of Prof David West" <friam-bounces@redfish.com on behalf of profwest@fastmail.fm> wrote:<br><br> This popped up elsewhere and I thought the FRIAM group might find it interesting. I had not heard of "statistical equivalence" before. The GIF recalled to mind previous conversations about Reality (which is "real:" the dots, the triangles, the squares, ...?); models; interpretations (ala Copenhagen); even Nick's Natural Design.<br> <br> davew<br> <br><br>============================================================<br>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College<br>to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com<br>archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/<br>FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove<br></body></html>