<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Eric -</p>
    <p>Great back-of-envelop summary/speculation and I second your
      desire for someone well-steeped in these modeling/assessment
      issues.<br>
    </p>
    <p>We (speaking out of school for Merle, Stephen, and the team that
      went to and met with the Stockholm Team last month) would love to
      find someone with that depth/breadth of knowledge in this group
      (or one degree away).  I am remiss/slow in following up with the
      *one* member of the Stockholm Resilience Center I met there who
      *might* either have this level of depth/breadth or know someone
      who does.<br>
    </p>
    <p>I am trying hard to come up to speed, but the number of models
      and types of approaches and hidden agendas/constraints/assumptions
      are still overwhelming.   The IPCC seems to be the *best* official
      source that is most broadly accepted, etc.  but tends to be one or
      two levels of detail above the kinds of questions I have (and you
      are asking here). <br>
    </p>
    <p>I am interested in something much broader than just the
      geo/bio/cryo/hydro/aero-science of it all, though THAT is huge and
      complicated enough as it is.   The Integrated Assessment Models
      that join this *physical* domain with the socio(political)economic
      domain seems most well discussed by the work of the Coupled Model
      Intercomparison Project (CMIP) lead by LLNL and tied into the
      World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) who are providing some of
      the "heavy lifting" for the IPCC's next (VI) report due in 2021.<br>
    </p>
    <p>   
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupled_Model_Intercomparison_Project">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupled_Model_Intercomparison_Project</a></p>
    <p>    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.wcrp-climate.org/">https://www.wcrp-climate.org/</a><br>
    </p>
    <p>- Steve<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/19/20 2:00 PM, David Eric Smith
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:0B6B5BA9-E6DF-4AD6-9846-04712373D870@santafe.edu">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      Would be interesting to know what the buffers are, that weren’t in
      that run of models.
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">Temperatures are lower than forecast, but Greenland
        and Antarctic ice sheet melting rates are higher.  They seem
        like small land areas, and the ice volume small, but specific
        heat of melting is large per volume compared to specific heat of
        air, and the atmosphere, while thick compared to ice, is only
        10-20 km high (to the top of the troposphere; stratosphere up to
        maybe 50km at much-reduced density and much increased
        transparency because it is dry).  So troposphere maybe 20-40
        times the depth of the west antarctic ice sheet, though only a
        lowermost layer of that is melting, and I don’t know the
        thickness per unit time lost.  Specific heat of dry air is about
        1 J/gK, while heat of melting of clean water is 334 J/g.  Ice is
        about 1000 times as dense as air, so one has a volume ratio of
        about 3x10^5 to play with, per degree Kelvin.  </div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">Greenland plus Antarctica (wikipedia-level area
        estimates) are about 3% of earth surface area.  So if one
        divided by a column density ratio of 30:1 and multiplied by an
        area ratio of 0.03, one has about 1/1000.  So a full melt of
        Greenland and Antarctic ice could buffer about 300K of
        atmospheric temperature change at a dimensional-analysis-level
        estimate.  If the full rate of melting were mis-estimated by a
        factor that extends the ice sheet lifetimes by 600 years, that
        would give about 1/2 degree per year buffering capacity.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">I don’t know what is or isn’t in the models up to
        2014, because I haven’t followed these things closely, but
        unless what I wrote above is nonsense, it seems that a
        mis-estimate of just continental ice sheet melting is not wildly
        out of scale to account for unmodeled buffers.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">One also wants to take into account arctic se ice,
        which if I really is on a faster melting schedule then some
        models predicted, though I don’t have even a good
        impressionistic memory of what I have heard on that.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">And of course there is the heat-transport rate of
        cyclonic storms, from sea surface to the top of the troposphere,
        where radiative transfer through the stratosphere will be much
        faster than that from the interior of the troposphere or the
        surface.  My understanding is that predicting frequency and
        intensity of typhoons etc. is still something of a challenge
        area, but I don’t know if that affects parameters used in GCM
        and heat-transfer models enough to count as an un-modeled
        buffer.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">Would be great if there is somebody on this list who
        has a comprehensive enough knowledge of the state of this
        literature to give the kind of survey of the state of the art in
        response to questions, that is hard to get from broadcast.  Good
        as it is, broadcast just contains whatever it contains, and
        doesn’t have the responsiveness of a person who can hear a
        question in context and then recruit knowledge for a matched
        reply.</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">Eric</div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class=""><br class="">
        <div><br class="">
          <blockquote type="cite" class="">
            <div class="">On Jan 20, 2020, at 1:55 AM, Pieter Steenekamp
              <<a href="mailto:pieters@randcontrols.co.za" class=""
                moz-do-not-send="true">pieters@randcontrols.co.za</a>>
              wrote:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <div class="">
              <div dir="ltr" class="">
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0pt 0pt
                  0.0001pt;font-family:Calibri"> </p>
                <div style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0.0001pt; font-family:
                  Calibri;" class="">Fortunately it seems that the earth
                  is warming much slower than what the models predicted.
                  So just maybe we have hope?</div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0pt 0pt
                  0.0001pt;font-family:Calibri"> </p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0pt 0pt
                  0.0001pt;font-family:Calibri"> </p>
                <div class=""><span id="cid:ii_k5l9g1k70"><image.png></span><br
                    class="">
                </div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0pt 0pt
                  0.0001pt;font-family:Calibri"> </p>
                <div style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0.0001pt; font-family:
                  Calibri;" class=""><a
href="https://judithcurry.com/2015/12/17/climate-models-versus-climate-reality/"
                    class="" moz-do-not-send="true"><u class=""><span
                        class="gmail-15"
                        style="font-family:SimSun;color:rgb(0,0,255);font-size:12pt">https://judithcurry.com/2015/12/17/climate-models-versus-climate-reality/</span></u></a></div>
              </div>
              <br class="">
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at
                  22:36, Jochen Fromm <<a
                    href="mailto:jofr@cas-group.net" class=""
                    moz-do-not-send="true">jofr@cas-group.net</a>>
                  wrote:<br class="">
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                  <div dir="auto" class="">
                    <div dir="auto" class="">Trump's channel Fox News is
                      owned by the Australian Murdoch family. Can two
                      families ruin the entire planet? Trump in America
                      and Murdoch in Australia are creating tremendous
                      damage. If Climate Change leads to an
                      uninhabitable world, as David Wallace-Wells
                      describes in his book, these two families
                      certainly contributed to it</div>
                    <a
href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GVPFH5V/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1"
                      target="_blank" class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GVPFH5V/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1</a>
                    <div dir="auto" class=""><br class="">
                    </div>
                    <div dir="auto" class="">The Washington Post writes:</div>
                    <div dir="auto" class="">"When we think of
                      industries that must change to prevent further
                      global warming, we tend to imagine
                      carbon-intensive concerns such as mining, aviation
                      and energy production. But the Murdoch media and
                      the rest of the climate denialist industry will
                      also need a transition plan. They do not have long
                      to implement it."</div>
                    <div dir="auto" class=""><a
href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/16/australias-catastrophic-fires-are-moment-reckoning-murdochs-media-empire/"
                        target="_blank" class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/16/australias-catastrophic-fires-are-moment-reckoning-murdochs-media-empire/</a></div>
                    <div dir="auto" class=""><br class="">
                    </div>
                    <div dir="auto" class="">-Jochen</div>
                    <div dir="auto" class=""><br class="">
                    </div>
                    <div dir="auto" class=""><br class="">
                    </div>
                  </div>
============================================================<br class="">
                  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br class="">
                  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College<br
                    class="">
                  to unsubscribe <a
                    href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class=""
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br
                    class="">
                  archives back to 2003: <a
                    href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class=""
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br
                    class="">
                  FRIAM-COMIC <a
                    href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class=""
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
                  by Dr. Strangelove<br class="">
                </blockquote>
              </div>
============================================================<br class="">
              FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br class="">
              Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College<br
                class="">
              to unsubscribe <a
                href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                class="" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br
                class="">
              archives back to 2003: <a
                href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/" class=""
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br
                class="">
              FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                class="" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
              by Dr. Strangelove<br class="">
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br class="">
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
archives back to 2003: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a> by Dr. Strangelove
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>