<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><tt>Ha! And a boon would be we can transform it arbitrarily onto
any other domain-specific ontology. So, whatever is written
about, say, evolutionary biology could be mapped ... [cough] <font
size="+3" color="#ff002a">metaphored</font> ... into a paper
about, say, </tt><font face="URW Gothic">holography</font><tt>!
If we can design a </tt><font face="Courier New, Courier,
monospace">GAN</font><tt> to well-fit the maps, then whatever
"theory" we end up with will provide us with <u><i><b>the</b></i></u>
explanation of </tt><font face="Comic Sans MS">consciousness</font><tt>
and solve the hard problem! </tt><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Man this technology thing is cool.
Whatever was I thinking. >8^D<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/4/20 4:19 PM, Marcus Daniels
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:A92BD205-116E-419B-8580-360980437415@snoutfarm.com">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I think there should be a XML-based
ontology format to encode our
<i>important</i> conversations as a formal system. And not
mere CSS3, there should be a whole XSL pipeline to generate
Nick’s book. Everyone
<b>follow the rules</b> or your e-mails will not validate and
<b>will be rejected</b> by the mail server!</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="0">--
☣ uǝlƃ</pre>
</body>
</html>