<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>EricS -</p>
    <p>I think this gives a good "hint" of part of what a fully
      Socialized or Communal system looks like to some (e.g.
      Libertarians), and why they resist what others of us might see as
      "reasonable attempts at leveling the playing field".   <br>
    </p>
    <p>I'm definitely ambivalent in the sense of being of "two minds".  
      I am a creature (ego?) shaped by the struggles and challenges I
      have experienced... and "what didn't kill me made me stronger" or
      maybe more to the point, I am a product of my experiences (nod to
      Glen's "diachronic" vs "episodic" thoughts).   <br>
    </p>
    <p>I have only the thinnest apprehension of Glen's "Anarcho
      Syndicalism" (sure I've read a little, but have far from had time
      to think through it all)  but it has some of the positive features
      I look for like "structure at all scales" and "self-similarity"
      possibilities, explaining not only how "history doesn't repeat
      itself, it rhymes" (Clemens) but perhaps how cultural sub-units,
      "bubbles" if you will also rhyme across geography/culture as well
      as time.   A bit of a cultural/semantic version of the
      "multi-verse foam" ideas in physics/cosmology.</p>
    <p>Also the best reason I can accept for a continued-to-expand
      humanity... with consciousness being not unlike the big-bang,
      expanding (in quality) right up to our current era where the likes
      of Musk and several nation-states are aspiring to begin to
      colonize the inner system (at least moon/mars) in our (their?)
      lifetimes.</p>
    <p>- SteveS<br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEYGzMDcN9kg5N43YRoF8g1v3wLMP7FkDh1y3RC2XbTcTCkvFg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">Nick, while I laud your motivation, I strongly
        disagree with your proposed solution. The desire for a basic
        fairness of some sort should be kept quite different the notion
        of creating a flatland. We WANT a society full of people who
        faced a variety of different struggles. 
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>This is a Peirce/Dewey democracy problem. <i><u>IF</u></i>
          the rationale for a democratic system is that we make better
          decisions when we bringing a variety of perspectives to bear
          on a problem, then the push for flat-land destroys the
          rationale for having a democratic system. While we might
          easily agree that those struggles should not include a risk of
          literal starvation, that doesn't mean we want them all to
          start out with access to identical fiscal resources and
          identical educational opportunities. That some people have
          more food than others, in a system that guarantees everyone a
          baseline amount of food to support development, is perfectly
          fine. <br clear="all">
          <div>
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
              data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:32
          AM <<a href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div lang="EN-US">
            <div class="gmail-m_3212932913286915413WordSection1">
              <p class="MsoNormal">Thanks, Eric.  He came off better on
                the podcast.  Glad to be corrected.  This American Life
                did one of it’s quixotic treatments of systems in which
                leaders are chosen at random, and, of course, was quite
                pleased by the result.  By the way, isn’t that how the
                Dali Lama is  chosen?  </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">I still think we should randomize all
                the babies at birth, take huge amounts of money off the
                top and pour it in at the bottom in the form of
                education and flat-out income adjustment so that no
                child is disadvantaged by the station of his/her birth. 
              </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Nick </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Nicholas Thompson</p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Emeritus Professor of Ethology and
                Psychology</p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Clark University</p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                  href="mailto:ThompNickSon2@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                    style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">ThompNickSon2@gmail.com</span></a></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                  href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                    style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/</span></a></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div
style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt
                solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Friam <<a
                    href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam-bounces@redfish.com</a>>
                  <b>On Behalf Of </b>Eric Charles<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 18, 2020 6:20 AM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
                  Coffee Group <<a href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam@redfish.com</a>><br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> Re: [FRIAM] Getting You Libertarians'
                  Goats</p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal">So.... delayed response to the
                  original... based on the longer reviews I've seen,
                  this is partially a criticism of meritocracy itself,
                  but also a very strong criticism of the neo-liberal
                  bastardization of meritocracy. As it says in the
                  opening line of the review in the original post: The
                  thing being criticized are "pernicious assumptions"
                  about merit. From what I can tell, his TED talk
                  summarizes the book well: <a
                    href="https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_sandel_the_tyranny_of_merit"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_sandel_the_tyranny_of_merit</a> </p>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">He starts out with some
                    discussion of moral luck, but in my opinion not a
                    great discussion of it. Then he moves on to
                    criticize a world where pieces of paper are confused
                    for ability. In such a world, those without
                    the right pieces of paper are deemed to lack merit
                    and are told they can't have dignity. That part is
                    criticizing a world in which our leaders
                    continuously message that everyone should go to
                    college, encouraging a false belief that a getting a
                    degree somehow magically makes you successful, and
                    encouraging the implicit (or sometimes explicit)
                    judgement that not getting a degree somehow a
                    personal failure and that getting a degree and then
                    not succeeding is an incoherent position to be in.
                    The failure of that program of thought has been
                    huge. It is hard to explain how many of the students
                    I taught at Penn State Altoona had their lives made
                    worse by getting a degree. They are working the same
                    jobs they could have worked out of high school, but
                    with 4 years less experience, added shame and
                    frustration, crippling debt, and a worse
                    relationship with parents who can't understand why
                    having a degree hasn't made their kids successful.
                    And you can't try to defend this by hand-waving at
                    education being virtuous in its own right, but it
                    won't work, because by any reasonable measure they
                    aren't very educated either. </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">Even with as right as some parts
                    of that critique are, it is all somehow
                    seething with the suspect rhetoric of the protestant
                    work ethic. There is nothing inherently virtuous in
                    being exploited for your labor (in the Marxist sense
                    of providing profit to a capitalist), and he is
                    somehow lumping all "work" together in a way that
                    obscures that. </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">When all is said and done, it is
                    an interesting argument, but my Libertarian Goat is
                    doing fine, thank you :- )</p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <div>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
                              </p>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 1:28 PM
                    <<a href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote:</p>
                </div>
                <blockquote
style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt
                  solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in
                  6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">This should do it!</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><a
href="https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/michael-j-sandel/the-tyranny-of-merit/"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/michael-j-sandel/the-tyranny-of-merit/</a></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">The thesis is that
                        “meritocracy” is the cause of the fact that the
                        us is now the least socially mobile country
                        among the western democracies.  </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Nick </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Nicholas Thompson</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Emeritus Professor of
                        Ethology and Psychology</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">Clark University</p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                          href="mailto:ThompNickSon2@gmail.com"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ThompNickSon2@gmail.com</a></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                          href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/</a></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. ..
                    ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
                    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
                      href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
                    un/subscribe <a
                      href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                    archives: <a
                      href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br>
                    FRIAM-COMIC <a
                      href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
                  </p>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
          FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
          Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
            href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
          un/subscribe <a
            href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
          archives: <a href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br>
          FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a> 
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>