<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-abstract/78/S1/344/1836831">https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-abstract/78/S1/344/1836831</a></p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/10/20 12:02 AM, Steve Smith
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:6fba73e3-329b-b3c2-1daf-9009e59d50bd@swcp.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:F8FBB725-AA31-4150-AF2B-89282FD4E4AD@snoutfarm.com">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        It is the first principal component..<br>
      </blockquote>
      <p>Agreed, but is that a feature of our winner-takes-all voting
        system?   Do we *like* having our lives/livelihood reduced to
        such?  Do we have a choice in letting this projection of a
        "properly complex life/value-system" onto a pair of polarized
        political parties? <br>
      </p>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:F8FBB725-AA31-4150-AF2B-89282FD4E4AD@snoutfarm.com">
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
          <blockquote type="cite">On Oct 9, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Steve
            Smith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
              href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com" moz-do-not-send="true"><sasmyth@swcp.com></a>
            wrote:<br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <p>I agree that the illusion of there being only the single
              axis of Left/Right is a travesty.   <br>
            </p>
            <p>I also intuit that my own preferences for
              ranked-choice-voting to *allow in* more dimensions may be
              naive in some way I don't fully apprehend.</p>
            <p>I'd love for you (and others) here to explore the
              paradoxes and inconsistencies implied in all of this.<br>
            </p>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/9/20 9:18 PM, Eric
              Charles wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEYGzMDNi2A3z17+Z3196eEVovxNCHrRpN0JNVTwntK16W2xgw@mail.gmail.com">
              <div dir="ltr">--- reconfigure (expand) it from 9 to 15
                but<br>
                *balance* the Left/Right ideology (I think he proposed
                5/5) and then  ---------
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
                      data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div dir="ltr">Note that one thing both
                              parties agree on is that we should
                              conceive politics as utterly and
                              completely a choice between the two of
                              them. God forbid that we conceive of
                              judges using any other dimensions. In
                              fact, let's enshrine it in law that we
                              must forever focus on exactly whether we
                              have a "balance" of "left" and "right".
                              Ugh!</div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at
                  4:48 PM Steve Smith <<a
                    href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">sasmyth@swcp.com</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> Ha!  I refer to
                  the last bit as "ok fine, TWIST my drinking arm!" when<br>
                  someone offers to buy me one...   the only one to
                  twists my drinking arm<br>
                  this last six months has been Mary... and Maybe
                  Stephen and his circle<br>
                  on "ZoomGrappaNight".<br>
                  <br>
                  I don't like the language around "packing the
                  court".   I don't think<br>
                  "reconfiguring the court" is the same as "packing the
                  court".   Clearly,<br>
                  the (not so) loyal opposition to the Dems *would* pack
                  the court...  add<br>
                  6 more justices and make sure they are ALL
                  conservative leaners.   Pete<br>
                  Buttegeig was the first to speak of this in my
                  earshot, and HIS version<br>
                  sounded pretty reasonable...   reconfigure (expand) it
                  from 9 to 15 but<br>
                  *balance* the Left/Right ideology (I think he proposed
                  5/5) and then<br>
                  leave it to the Justices themselves to fill the
                  remaining 5 (through<br>
                  some arcane process?).    What the Republicans have
                  been building up to<br>
                  for decades is "packing the courts".   <br>
                  <br>
                  Checks and balances are tricky, as is depending on
                  social norms and<br>
                  standards, but I think it might be "as good as it
                  gets", at least for<br>
                  the time being.<br>
                  <br>
                  - Steve<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  On 10/8/20 1:36 PM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:<br>
                  > Ha! That was the essence of one of the 538 panel
                  member's phrasing suggestion for Kamala Harris in
                  response to Pence's question about packing SCOTUS. The
                  elaborated version was: "Because confirming Barrett,
                  NOW, is such a horribly wrong thing to do, we have no
                  choice BUT to pack the court." ... I.e. now look what
                  you made me do. That was my dad's favorite phrase to
                  justify whatever abuse he chose to mete out that day.
                  He once ran over my bicycle with his truck. I *made*
                  him run over my bike because I left it laying in the
                  driveway. It's a running joke with my fellow drinkers
                  who *regularly* FORCE me to drink more than I should.
                  There is no free will. I live to serve.<br>
                  ><br>
                  > On 10/8/20 11:28 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:<br>
                  >> Look what you made me do,<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-.
                  .<br>
                  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                  Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
                    href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">
                    bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
                  un/subscribe <a
                    href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
                    http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                  archives: <a
                    href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
                    http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/<br>
                    FRIAM-COMIC</a> <a
                    href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
                    http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a> <br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
              <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
              <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a> 
</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <span>- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-.
              .</span><br>
            <span>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</span><br>
            <span>Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam</span><br>
            <span>un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a></span><br>
            <span>archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a></span><br>
            <span>FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
            </span><br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a> 
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a> 
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>