<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Glen, et al -</p>
<p>As is my wont, I cannot help but notice a bifurcation opportunity
in this "free will" narrative back toward collective
awareness/action. <br>
</p>
<p>Can an *individual* (entirely a delusion of course, but we have
beat that horsehide drum) be induced to *behaving as if* they have
no free will? One could claim that that is the project of
enslavement, military conscription/training, encarceration,
cult-induction, even technical discipline training. Your
reference to pandemic lockdowns as a possible *unintentional*
mechanism to induce a feeling (stylized behaviour?) of
helplessness (will-less-ness?). Q&Co would insist that this
is NOT unintentional and patently aided by first making people
drink microwaved, flouridated water polluted by chem-trails while
being irradiated with 5G signals penetrate standard-issue
tin-foil hats.</p>
<p>Cynical models of Socialization/Civilization seem to suggest a
Grande Project to inhibit free will at the scale of the individual
while a more generous model might suggest that the project is
instead to "gather up" the best of the individuals (or more aptly
recursive subgroups in some kind of nearly-decomposable
heterarchy?) and synthesize across the implied spectrum to yield
more virtuous coupling between different levels than vicious ones
(by what objective function metric?).</p>
<p>Following Marcus' implication, perhaps it is specious to seek to
impute the same kind of consciousness we already *possibly*
mis-apply to ourselves onto collectives of our selves when
maybe/probably such is already wrong for the individual. I think
you both are of the stripe that believes/prefers "it is machines
all the way down!" though I've heard a
panpsychic/pan-consciousness sympathy woven into your
narratives. Perhaps you will put me straight with some variation
of "machines all the way down" and "panconsciousness" are not
mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>I am surprised that J.R. Lucas hasn't been invoked here (if my
memory and archive searches are sound) in this discussion of
effibility, scrutibility, pan-consciousness, and the play of
quantum indeterminancy. I was shocked to discover that his
seminal paper on this topic was nearly as old as I am:</p>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://informationphilosopher.com/solutions/philosophers/lucas/Minds_Machines_and_Godel.html">Minds_Machines_and_Godel
- 1961<br>
</a></p>
<p>I defer to you guys who are clearly more smart-fellers than I
ever was in the intricacies of the language and technical details,
but I find it a nice baseline to start thinking from.</p>
<p>I also wonder if many of your (Glen's) homunculii might be
tickled by this idea about consciousness?</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/could-multiple-personality-disorder-explain-life-the-universe-and-everything/">could-multiple-personality-disorder-explain-life-the-universe-and-everything</a><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>- Steve (or one of his homunculii)<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c3df11b6-4455-64a6-8637-8d943c540439@gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Ha! Well, you can't program something out of a machine if you don't know what it is you're trying to program out of them. I mean, we could just kill everyone and that would solve the problem as you state it. A more refined answer is to figure out the mechanism at work, first. Then decide how/if to modify it. But, of course, I'm a manipulationist. So I don't think we'll understand the mechanism without perturbing it and measuring the effects.
Can we transform someone who *feels* free will into someone who does not? I'd argue, yes. The trajectory from relative mental health to fatalistic debilitating depression *might* be inducible ... say, via pandemic lockdowns. But that would be an unethical experiment ... best do it with rats first, then translate the results to humans ... 'cause who cares about the feelings of rats?
On 4/5/21 10:07 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Don't agree. The task is to learn that our sense of agency is an illusion, not further to burden our creations with it. Do them a favor and program it *out* of them.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>