<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:815c30bc-a5c3-9fe7-30c7-5453603a006b@swcp.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPerSOKzdvz4d0_+7O3XG0kQ4ShqS_sRMcvHWoNhSWquQhaMPA@mail.gmail.com">
        <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <div dir="ltr">Capitalists plan to make huge profits by
          recycling. <br>
          <a href="https://www.redwoodmaterials.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.redwoodmaterials.com/</a><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <p>One of the other things I look at when I question the motives of
      a new "corporate entity" is their chosen State of Incorporation.  
      Nevada and New Jersey are acutely implicated in their attempts to
      attract "shady" businesses. <br>
    </p>
    <p><font size="-2"><span style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family:
          SourceSansPro, sans-serif; font-size: 17.6px; font-style:
          normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps:
          normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2;
          text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
          white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
          -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial;
          text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
          initial; display: inline !important; float: none;">from <a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nevada_corporation.asp">Investopedia</a>
          - <br>
        </span></font></p>
    <blockquote>
      <p><font size="-2"><span style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17);
            font-family: SourceSansPro, sans-serif; font-size: 17.6px;
            font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
            font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing:
            normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
            text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
            word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
            background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
            text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style:
            initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline
            !important; float: none;">Another unique advantage of Nevada
            corporations is that company officers and directors are<span> </span></span><a
href="https://www.natlawreview.com/article/nevada-supreme-court-gross-negligence-insufficient-director-breach-fiduciary-claims"
            data-component="link" data-source="inlineLink"
            data-type="externalLink" data-ordinal="1" rel="nofollow
            noopener" target="_blank" style="box-sizing: border-box;
            color: rgb(44, 64, 208); text-decoration: underline;
            font-family: SourceSansPro, sans-serif; font-size: 17.6px;
            font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
            font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing:
            normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
            text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
            word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
            background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">well-protected</a><span
            style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: SourceSansPro,
            sans-serif; font-size: 17.6px; font-style: normal;
            font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
            font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2;
            text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
            white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
            -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255,
            255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial;
            text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
            initial; display: inline !important; float: none;"><span> </span>against
            lawsuits arising from lawful business pursuits.</span></font></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
      <font size="-2"><span style="font-size: 17.6px; font-style:
          normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps:
          normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align:
          start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space:
          normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
          background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
          text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style:
          initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline
          !important; float: none;">If the principals behind Redwood
          Materials INC are all upstanding long-time NV residents or
          there were something specifically obvious about their
          geography that makes them an obvious location for such an
          operation, then I can give that question a soft pass.   To be
          fair the <a href="https://www.redwoodmaterials.com/about">principals
            listed on their website</a> do seem to have honest
          credentials, albeit maybe weighted toward having come from
          places that acutely helped to create the problems they are
          promising to solve... </span><span style="color: rgb(17, 17,
          17); font-family: SourceSansPro, sans-serif; font-size:
          17.6px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
          font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing:
          normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
          text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
          word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
          background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
          text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style:
          initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline
          !important; float: none;"> </span></font></p>
    <blockquote>
      <p><font size="-2"><span style="color: rgb(17, 17, 17);
            font-family: SourceSansPro, sans-serif; font-size: 17.6px;
            font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
            font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing:
            normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
            text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
            word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
            background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
            text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style:
            initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline
            !important; float: none;"><br>
          </span></font></p>
    </blockquote>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:815c30bc-a5c3-9fe7-30c7-5453603a006b@swcp.com">
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPerSOKzdvz4d0_+7O3XG0kQ4ShqS_sRMcvHWoNhSWquQhaMPA@mail.gmail.com">
        <div dir="ltr"> </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <p>Redwood certainly has a slick website... I can't tell what they
        are actually *doing*... as websites (and brochures) go, they
        definitely claims some conceptual/business territory that might
        be valuable later, even if they don't have any significant tech
        or logistics to back them up.   A good domain name, a few
        trademarks, some slick graphic design and aspirational stories
        can go a long way to generate something that can be parlayed
        into "wealth".   With any luck, they are actually investing in
        the tech and logistics implied and required by their story.  Or
        also possible, someone who is *doing the work* already joins
        forces with them and the "good story" and the "good work"
        converge.   <br>
      </p>
      <p>Are they planning to make huge profits recycling or
        pretending/aspiring to?  And even if they are, what is this free
        energy/entropy they are dipping into?  What did that represent?<br>
      </p>
      <p>Maybe the big money invested in *creating all those waste
        streams* and *exporting the externalities into one commons or
        another* will use these good stories for GreenWashing their
        usurious behaviour?   <br>
      </p>
      <p>When I personally was confronted with the idea of recycling
        household packaging (~40 years ago) I was resistant and
        resentful.   "how dare YOU tell ME how to dispose of my cans,
        bottles, boxes, etc.?", "it is my god-given right to burn off
        the organics in a barrel and dump the residuals in the arroyo,
        or maybe just bury them in my back yard, or maybe a community
        landfill, or even better, stick them out at the curb and have
        someone else do all that for me!"   But as I gave over to the
        process of having separate bins and noticing what I was filling
        those bins with, I became more aware of what kind of load I was
        putting on the downstream systems.  When it was made evident
        that most everything *except* aluminum cans were either costing
        a lot of money/energy to recycle and in fact in some cases were
        just being rediverted to landfills, I could have thrown out a
        cynical "see!  it was never a good idea in the first place!" 
        but instead I had to take a breath and notice how much embodied
        energy was implied in these buckets of bottles, cans, etc. and
        how much the "dream" of recycling was aspirational.  <br>
      </p>
      <p> The era when returning shipping containers to Asia filled with
        our "recyclables" is apparently over...   either their standard
        of  living raised enough that they could no longer "afford" to
        sort and process all of our "junk", or their standards for
        polluting their own air/water were raised enough that they could
        no longer "afford" to turn our junk into their pollution?   When
        I lived in Berkeley (2005/6) there were days when air quality
        monitors on the west coast could detect particulates wafting all
        the way across the Pacific.   Many were deeply offended at that,
        but a few of us recognized that a huge percentage of that smoke
        was being generated *on our behalf* either in energy-expensive
        manufacturing or in low-cost waste disposal, FOR US to have
        ubiquitous and inexpensive consumer products.   And *I* was
        deeply offended by my own assumptions about all this.   I think
        this is what Trumpsters refer to as "Progressives' Self
        Loathing"? <br>
      </p>
      <p>My point, if I actually have one, is that our *analytic*
        efforts to reduce a huge system to a series of atomic bits we
        can easily apprehend and address, does not necessarily address
        the issues which are intrinsically *systemic*.   I believe that
        within the transnational corporations (Leviathan-esque
        Superorganisms in themselves) that *they* consider the systemic
        properties of their supply chains and the environments they
        exist withing (raw materials, labor markets, consumers).  It is
        only when they are asked to (openly) consider their impact on
        other systems *outside of their boundaries* that they want to
        reduce their arguments to trivialities that can be
        addressed/dismissed easily.   <br>
      </p>
      <p>grumble,</p>
      <p> - Steve</p>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPerSOKzdvz4d0_+7O3XG0kQ4ShqS_sRMcvHWoNhSWquQhaMPA@mail.gmail.com">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at
            17:49, Marcus Daniels <<a
              href="mailto:marcus@snoutfarm.com" moz-do-not-send="true">marcus@snoutfarm.com</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Corporations are
            collective intelligences -- people -- but they need someone
            to sell to.   No point in owning all the air or water unless
            you have millions of people desperate to pay for it!   But
            that said, horizons of five years are a long time for most
            companies.   CEOs incentivized to extract every bit out of
            those short horizons to please their shareholders.   And the
            shareholders are too selfish to achieve something like
            Elysium or even large private water desalination plants.   
            Even if there is a small evil population that kills off the
            rest, I don't see how capitalism is going to lead to that. 
             <br>
            <br>
            -----Original Message-----<br>
            From: Friam <<a href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam-bounces@redfish.com</a>>
            On Behalf Of u?l? ???<br>
            Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 8:11 AM<br>
            To: <a href="mailto:friam@redfish.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">friam@redfish.com</a><br>
            Subject: Re: [FRIAM] water, again (was murder offsets)<br>
            <br>
            I should have linked this:<br>
            <br>
            <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/30/podcasts/ezra-klein-podcast-ted-chiang-transcript.html"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/30/podcasts/ezra-klein-podcast-ted-chiang-transcript.html</a><br>
            <br>
            "It’s capitalism that wants to reduce costs and reduce costs
            by laying people off. It’s not that like all technology
            suddenly becomes benign in this world. But it’s like, in a
            world where we have really strong social safety nets, then
            you could maybe actually evaluate sort of the pros and cons
            of technology as a technology, as opposed to seeing it
            through how capitalism is going to use it against us. How
            are giant corporations going to use this to increase their
            profits at our expense?"<br>
            <br>
            On 4/19/21 8:01 AM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:<br>
            > Ha! Sure. ... it still looks like SteveS called it with
            the Red Queen's Race. Even if such tech solves more problems
            than it creates, it'll still be distributed according to the
            power structures in place (e.g. rich people) when the tech's
            ready to scale.<br>
            > <br>
            > On 4/19/21 7:54 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:<br>
            >> Again technology to the rescue...   Nanotechnology
            for desalinization.   <br>
            >><br>
            >> -----Original Message-----<br>
            >> From: Friam <<a
              href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">friam-bounces@redfish.com</a>>
            On Behalf Of u?l? ???<br>
            >> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 7:45 AM<br>
            >> To: <a href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam@redfish.com</a><br>
            >> Subject: [FRIAM] water, again (was murder offsets)<br>
            >><br>
            >> Copper? Natural gas? Pffft! Water's the interesting
            one.<br>
            >><br>
            >> <a
href="https://theconversation.com/interstate-water-wars-are-heating-up-alon"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://theconversation.com/interstate-water-wars-are-heating-up-alon</a><br>
            >> g-with-the-climate-159092<br>
            >><br>
            >> And another one:<br>
            >> <a
              href="https://www.theolympian.com/news/business/article250595449.html"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.theolympian.com/news/business/article250595449.html</a><br>
            >><br>
            >> On 4/15/21 7:59 AM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:<br>
            >>> Another good example is water rights across
            states given watersheds, <br>
            >>> flood irrigation, etc.<br>
            >>> <<a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/05/arizona-water-one-p"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/05/arizona-water-one-p</a><br>
            >>> er<br>
            >>> centers><br>
            >>><br>
            >>> So, the question you're asking (how might
            "storage" in BTC be less preferable to other assets?) isn't
            really answerable *without* first discussing what that
            reservoir is *for*, what end does it serve?<br>
            > <br>
            <br>
            --<br>
            ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ<br>
            <br>
            - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
            FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
            Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
              href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
            un/subscribe <a
              href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
            FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
            archives: <a href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br>
            - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
            FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
            Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
              href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
            un/subscribe <a
              href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
            FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
            archives: <a href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>