<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I have a friend who did a long stint in Ghana with the Peace
      Corps and contracted Malaria during that time and was quite
      consumed by it by the time he chose to return to the states.   He
      reported (when Hydroxychloroquine came up as a possible remedy for
      COVID) that he went through a number of high dose courses over
      (many?) months and while it did help him significantly beat it
      down, it was not without severe side effects (at those doses) and
      he *personally* believed that while it was a likely candidate for
      helping with a wild-card virus like COVID-19 that it was a risky
      thing to prescribe/use indiscriminately, if not for the health of
      the patient, for the squeeze on the supply for the myriad other
      uses it IS highly vetted for in the third world.   He seemed to
      believe that if COVID-19 demand took more than a minimal number of
      doses off the 3rd world supply (or raised the price), the net
      result would be not-a-good-thing by humanitarian standards.   <br>
    </p>
    <p>If SoAfrica, for example, boosted Quercetin production to meet
      your presumed need for broad use there, then it may well be a good
      thing if not taken in the doses that my friend had to take
      (apparently) to beat Malaria down.  He believe he still has
      residual effects from both Malaria (the illness) and
      Hyrdorxychloroquine (the cure) and wants to believe that he is
      overall better for having taken it, but mostly because he wants to
      believe that the docs were "doing their best", even if the cure
      did more damage than the illness.   <br>
    </p>
    <p>With that background I didn't have a problem with Trump taking
      the drug or even acknowledging it *might* be helpful, but I
      interpreted his endorsement as implying a "miracle cure" whilst
      paradoxically trying to dismiss any worries about the Virus itself
      and the lack of positive evidence the it was effective and the
      lack of negative evidence that the side-effects may be worse than
      the illness it was intended to relieve.  His schtick on the topic
      was, for lack of a better term, "very Trumpian".   That does not
      mean he was *dead wrong* about hydroxychloroquine... but imagine
      if he'd decided to dump all the support that went to vaccines into
      boosting production/delivery of hydroxychloroquine?    <br>
    </p>
    <p>Maybe South Africa will be a testbed for that strategy? Do you
      have any idea how extensively Quercetin is being used for COVID in
      South Africa?   Do you know if it is also used as a
      general-purpose anti-viral for other viruses (as it apparently is
      in more equatorial regions) like Malaria.  I just (re)read your
      post and realized you said "natural, over the counter" so it
      sounds like neither high-doses nor widely *prescribed* though
      maybe widely heralded/promoted?     <br>
    </p>
    <p>In any case, I hope that your over-the-counter wards are helpful
      to you and yours.   I'm an anecdotal fan of Zinc/C for helping me
      with at least the symptoms of cold/flu even though I generally
      eschew all supplements/medication (my Luddite thing).   I suppose
      I might dose with those if I had COVID symptoms or exposure...  
      and assuming your Quercetin is low dose, maybe even that, as long
      as it didn't line Donald Trump's pockets of course... <br>
    </p>
    <p>As inefficient as it is for every country/region to have a
      modesty different approach to a pandemic like this, I'm not
      inclined to vilify those who ended up "guessing wrong".   It is
      easy to armchair quarterback (in hindsight) the decisions made in
      other regions of the world with significantly different
      circumstances.   I'm guessing (but don't know) that South Africa's
      infection and death rates may be closer to Australia than India? 
      I also don't know if your lack of vaccines is a global supply
      problem, a government policy to not pursue them as heavily, or
      some unexplained coincidence? <br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/6/21 2:23 PM, Pieter Steenekamp
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPerSO+i5NzGW8zbhKTYKHVgQV2nkop-aDNFDj6182JfcfUqDg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><b><i><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"> is it true
                that the matter simply stands with the Hah-vud studies
                retracted, and nothing more said?  That doesn’t seem
                right.<br>
              </font></i></b></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        I just don't know.<br>
        <br>
        I speculated that the topic was just way too politicized to get
        to the bottom of it without spending serious time and effort on
        it and I chose not to do that. <br>
        <br>
        On a personal note, we don't yet have vaccinations in South
        Africa, my wife and I are each having daily doses of Quercetin,
        a natural over-the-counter version of 
        Hydroxychloroquine, and vitamin D and Zinc and a couple of other
        immune boosters too.   <br>
        <br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:46,
          <<a href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" lang="EN-US">
            <div class="gmail-m_5609060911828374488WordSection1">
              <p class="MsoNormal">Thanks, Pieter, </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Interesting.  As somebody who has
                followed the research, is it true that the matter simply
                stands with the Hah-vud studies retracted, and nothing
                more said?  That doesn’t seem right. </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Nick </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Nick Thompson</p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                  href="mailto:ThompNickSon2@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                    style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">ThompNickSon2@gmail.com</span></a></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                  href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                    style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/</span></a></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div
style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt
                solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Friam <<a
                    href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam-bounces@redfish.com</a>>
                  <b>On Behalf Of </b>Pieter Steenekamp<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, May 6, 2021 1:12 PM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
                  Coffee Group <<a href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam@redfish.com</a>><br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> Re: [FRIAM] FW: Covid-Lancet-PART-2
                  (002).doc</p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">I'm not
                  particularly fond of Donald Trump, but the elephant in
                  the room is that  Hydroxychloroquine became well-known
                  after Trump advocated it. At the time I followed and
                  researched it a bit and I came to the conclusion that
                  both the mainstream media and the medical industry
                  were against  Hydroxychloroquine mainly because Trump
                  actively advocated it. The Lancet saga certainly did
                  not influence me to change that conclusion.<br>
                  <br>
                </p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 19:52,
                    Frank Wimberly <<a
                      href="mailto:wimberly3@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">wimberly3@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote:</p>
                </div>
                <blockquote
style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt
                  solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in
                  6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">This
                      does not seem interesting to me.  The vaccines
                      have been demonstrated to be effective and safe to
                      very large degrees based on many millions of
                      inoculations.  Why should I care about some
                      suspect studies with small n.</p>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">---<br>
                        Frank C. Wimberly<br>
                        140 Calle Ojo Feliz, <br>
                        Santa Fe, NM 87505<br>
                        <br>
                        505 670-9918<br>
                        Santa Fe, NM</p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, May 6, 2021, 11:33 AM
                        <<a href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>>
                        wrote:</p>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote
style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt
                      solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in
                      6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">Dear Phellow Phriammers,
                          </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">I have noted that most of
                            what I have written here of late has been
                            ignored, and that’s ok, actually.  Usually,
                            it is the possibility that you MIGHT read
                            what I write that keeps me writing and,
                            behaviorist to the last, writing is what I
                            need to do in order to think.  </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">But this situation is
                            different.  I really don’t know what to
                            think about <a
                              href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dragan-Pavlovic-4"
                              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Pavlovic’s</a>
                            paper.  There may have been some trouble
                            with the cloud version, so I have attached
                            it to this message. </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">So, this is a case where
                            I really need some help.  I realize that you
                            are all engaged in this excellent
                            correspondence about UBI, which has revealed
                            all sorts of “-ists” that I never thought
                            were alive and well in the world, let alone
                            in this group.  I would not interfere with
                            that for a second.  But, could a few of you
                            take a look at his <a
                              href="https://1drv.ms/w/s!AptIKbsAd7gjllccpq9yXXQ4hb2N?e=HCzjaV"
                              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">paper</a>
                             (very short, a commentary, actually).  I
                            think he is actually a candidate for this
                            group.  He is an MD, Phd, anaesthesiologist,
                            retired in Paris, who has participated in
                            hundreds of scientific papers,  who is
                            passionate ( I worry, perhaps sometimes a
                            bit too passionate) about dozens of
                            different things and suspicious of
                            everything. He wants, for instance, to dig a
                            gigantic tunnel to bring large ships
                            directly from the danube to the
                            Mediterranean.   </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">I, of course, live in a
                            bubble, but I don’t like to have that fact
                            thrust in my face as powerfully as when he
                            reveals to me that the two HAAA=VUD papers
                            denouncing Chloquoroquine were retracted a
                            year ago, and I never found out.  I can’t
                            get any sense of whether there has been any
                            attempt to revive them or to redo the
                            original clinical study that suggested HCQ’s
                            efficacy against CoVid.   </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">Any little bit of help
                            you could give me would be great. </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">Nick </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <div>
                            <p class="MsoNormal">Nick Thompson</p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                                href="mailto:ThompNickSon2@gmail.com"
                                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                                  style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">ThompNickSon2@gmail.com</span></a></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                                href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/"
                                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                                  style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/</span></a></p>
                          </div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <div>
                            <div
style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt
                              solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in
                              0in">
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a
                                  href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com"
                                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>
                                <<a
                                  href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com"
                                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>>
                                <br>
                                <b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 5, 2021 9:48
                                PM<br>
                                <b>To:</b> 'The Friday Morning Applied
                                Complexity Coffee Group' <<a
                                  href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"
                                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">friam@redfish.com</a>><br>
                                <b>Cc:</b> 'Prof David West' <<a
                                  href="mailto:profwest@fastmail.fm"
                                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">profwest@fastmail.fm</a>><br>
                                <b>Subject:</b> Covid-Lancet-PART-2
                                (002).doc</p>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p>Dear Colleagues, </p>
                          <p> </p>
                          <p>I attach a <a
                              href="https://1drv.ms/w/s!AptIKbsAd7gjllccpq9yXXQ4hb2N?e=HCzjaV"
                              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">paper</a>
                            written by an internet acquaintance I made
                            some years back, Dragan Pavlovic.  I am
                            sending it along for two reasons.  First, it
                            reveals (to me, at least) that the two
                            negative studies on Hydroxychloroquine use
                            in SARS-CoVid-19 treatment were based on
                            unverified data and were withdrawn by their
                            authors almost immediately.  (Have the rest
                            of you known this for the last year and not
                            told me?  I cannot believe, after we
                            pilloried poor Dave for advocating for it,
                            that he has not gloated about it. ) Second,
                            Pavlovic raises the intension/extension
                            distinction in the context of the
                            interpretation of scientific results and
                            also questions Randomized Control Trials as
                            the "Gold Standard" for discovery. Thus, I
                            think he is a kindred spirit, being a bit of
                            a grumpy contrarian like many of us here.  I
                            have promised to forward any comments you
                            make to him, so be polite but speak truth. 
                             </p>
                          <p> </p>
                          <p>Thanks, </p>
                          <p> </p>
                          <p>Nick Nicholas Thompson</p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">Emeritus Professor of
                            Ethology and Psychology</p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">Clark University</p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                              href="mailto:ThompNickSon2@gmail.com"
                              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ThompNickSon2@gmail.com</a></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"><a
                              href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/"
                              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/</a></p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                          <p> </p>
                          <p> </p>
                          <p> </p>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-.
                        .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
                        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                        Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
                          href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
                        un/subscribe <a
                          href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                        FRIAM-COMIC <a
                          href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
                        archives: <a
                          href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a></p>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. ..
                    ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
                    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
                      href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
                    un/subscribe <a
                      href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                    FRIAM-COMIC <a
                      href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
                    archives: <a
                      href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a></p>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .<br>
          FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
          Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
            href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
          un/subscribe <a
            href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
          FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
          archives: <a href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/">http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>