<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>DaveW -</p>
    <p>I too am a Bacigalupi fan, "Water Knife" in particular, also
      "Windup Girl" but for different reasons.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>It might not surprise anyone here that I have become a CliFi
      obsessionist with Kim Stanly Robinson's stuff well represented
      ("Ministry for the Future" standing out well above the others). 
      His Red/Green/Blue Mars series is a good complement with the
      social/technological/spiritual implications of Terraforming
      there.  The 2015 <a
href="https://www.amazon.com/Loosed-upon-World-Anthology-Climate/dp/1481450301/ref=asc_df_1481450301/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312029683605&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=5512945638363124067&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9030505&hvtargid=pla-491283653239&psc=1">Loosed
        Upon the World</a> anthology of Climate Fiction includes
      contributions from Bacigalupi, Robinson, Atwood among others.</p>
    <p>Most recently, I read Neal Stephenson's well crafted "Termination
      Shock" which I feel is way too focused on TechnoPhilic
      GeoEngineering escape conceptions but as is his style he covers
      the sociopolitical implications of Climate Change *and* our
      response to it well with his very unique style.</p>
    <p>The classic (pre)CliFi (for me) is Santa Fe's own Roger Zelazny
      (RIP) 70s "Damnation Alley" which was made into a very weak
      B-movie (as most SF was before the budgets started getting
      gargantuan (e.g. Star Wars/Trek/Gate/???).   Bruce Sterling's 1994
      Heavy Weather was a good (early) dip into the implications of
      climate change on extreme weather from the perspective of a gaggle
      of Storm Chasers.  Another NM author(s) is Stephen Gould and Laura
      Mixon's "GreenWar!".  There are surely earlier examples, but I'm
      not recalling.  Of course one could press biblical things like the
      Deluge (Genesis) or the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse in Genesis,
      Zecharia, Revelations...<br>
    </p>
    <p>Jack Williamson's (RIP)  (New Mexico's amazing son raised on
      classic Scientific Romances and contributing his own work right at
      the beginning of the Golden Age). <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/898087.Terraforming_Earth">Terraforming
        Earth</a> is a "Dont Look Up" (asteroid smacking) scenario which
      does a good job IMO (I'm a big fan of his life story and work) of
      addressing the (near) mortality of the human species and Earth's
      biosphere itself.  The friend who introduced me to him in his 90s
      (died at 103?) knew him when he was a teen and provided him with
      the title for this book, though his first choice was "Terraforming
      Terra", but the publishers prevailed with "Earth" for arcane
      reasons.  FWIW the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.capstan.be/sci-fi-is-a-fertile-breeding-ground-for-neologisms-some-have-entered-everyday-language-and-even-scientific-jargon/">OED's
        SciFi inspired neologisms</a> credits Jack for coining
      "Terraforming" in a 1941 novel.  <br>
    </p>
    <p> ?Glen?'s invocation of the earth as a seed becoming an
      (naturally) empty husk (an expelled placenta?, a recovering womb?)
      as we flee it has interesting implications I hadn't thought of
      before... it is a good complementary perspective to thinking of it
      as simply escaping our own self-fouled water-hole.   "Terraforming
      Earth" also puts it's own twist on this.</p>
    <p>Ramble,</p>
    <p>- Steve<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/25/22 2:05 PM, Prof David West
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:c3adc51a-00df-49f4-bbc4-4ea72e092b9e@www.fastmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <title></title>
      <style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">Paolo Bacigalupi, The Water Knife.
        Excellent read, more for background on water and the kinds of
        things people WILL do to access it, than the story line.<br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><span><i>In the near future, the
            Colorado River has dwindled to a trickle. Detective,
            assassin, and spy, Angel Velasquez “cuts” water for the
            Southern Nevada Water Authority, ensuring that its lush
            arcology developments can bloom in Las Vegas. When rumors of
            a game-changing water source surface in Phoenix, Angel is
            sent south, hunting for answers that seem to evaporate as
            the heat index soars and the landscape becomes more and more
            oppressive. There, he encounters Lucy Monroe, a hardened
            journalist with her own agenda, and Maria Villarosa, a young
            Texas migrant, who dreams of escaping north. As bodies begin
            to pile up, the three find themselves pawns in a game far
            bigger and more corrupt than they could have imagined, and
            when water is more valuable than gold, alliances shift like
            sand, and the only truth in the desert is that someone will
            have to bleed if anyone hopes to drink.</i></span></div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">davew<br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div>On Tue, Jan 25, 2022, at 11:02 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style="">
        <div style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, Helvetica,
          sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);">Glen writes:<br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, Helvetica,
          sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, Helvetica,
          sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);">< <span
            style="color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background-color:rgb(255, 255,
            255);display:inline !important;"><span class="font"
              style="font-family:"Segoe UI", "Segoe UI
              Web (West European)", "Segoe UI",
              -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica
              Neue", sans-serif;"><span class="size"
                style="font-size:14.6667px;">I don't see how we can
                prune the combinatorial explosion of [im]possible
                outcomes without deciding some kind of objective at the
                start, even if it's super vague like a Gaia-ish
                homeostatic health of the biosphere. ></span></span></span><br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, Helvetica,
          sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span
            style="color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background-color:rgb(255, 255,
            255);display:inline !important;"><span class="font"
              style="font-family:"Segoe UI", "Segoe UI
              Web (West European)", "Segoe UI",
              -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica
              Neue", sans-serif;"><span class="size"
                style="font-size:14.6667px;"></span></span></span><br>
        </div>
        <div style=""><span class="colour" style="color:rgb(32, 31,
            30);"><span style=""><span class="size"
                style="font-size:14.6667px;">One could imagine a sort of
                Mad Max scenario out in the streets where the Whole
                Foods deliveries are intercepted by the street dwelling
                climate refugees?   Or large compounds where food,
                water, temperature-controlled clean air were ensured for
                a price?   Take all the rusting metal sitting around
                from Trump's wall and build bigger fences around
                estates?   Green Zones, like in the Iraq sense?   </span></span></span><br>
        </div>
        <div style=""><span class="colour" style="color:rgb(32, 31,
            30);"><span style=""><span class="size"
                style="font-size:14.6667px;"></span></span></span><br>
        </div>
        <div style=""><span class="colour" style="color:rgb(32, 31,
            30);"><span style=""><span class="size"
                style="font-size:14.6667px;">Marcus</span></span></span><br>
        </div>
        <div id="qt-appendonsend"><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%;"><br>
        </div>
        <div id="qt-divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr">
          <div><span class="font" style="font-family:Calibri,
              sans-serif;"><span class="colour" style="color:rgb(0, 0,
                0);"><b>From:</b> Friam
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"><friam-bounces@redfish.com></a> on behalf of glen
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com"><gepropella@gmail.com></a><br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 25, 2022 11:50 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com">friam@redfish.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"><friam@redfish.com></a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [FRIAM] health care logistics</span></span>
          </div>
          <div> <br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="qt-BodyFragment"><span class="size"
            style="font-size:13px;"><span style=""><span class="size"
                style="font-size:11pt;">
                <div class="qt-PlainText">
                  <div>Well, OK. But the question still stands:
                    Necessary for what objective?<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> The Siebert & Rees paper talks about shared
                    values like "socially just ecological
                    sustainability", "salvage civilization", "one-earth
                    living", etc. And each one of their criticisms in
                    section 3 also assume some values. So, I'm guessing
                    it's something like their objective that we're
                    assuming as our objective. And anything that does
                    not target that objective isn't put into the kitty
                    of things we'll evaluate as possible or impossible.
                    (E.g. the second-earth idea where we abandon this
                    earth as a husk is not part of the conversation.)<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> I don't see how we can prune the combinatorial
                    explosion of [im]possible outcomes without deciding
                    some kind of objective at the start, even if it's
                    super vague like a Gaia-ish homeostatic health of
                    the biosphere.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> On 1/25/22 06:39, David Eric Smith wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > To say this is a value question is fair,
                    glen, given my shorthands of language.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > However, I would like to split apart
                    questions of “who wants what” from questions of
                    “what can or cannot happen under what conditions,
                    irrespective of what anybody wants”.  In principle
                    we have ways to get at the latter question; we often
                    do worse in getting any resolution out of the
                    former.  Maybe there is something basic in this? 
                    Our notion of truth is that on any properly-posed
                    question, there should only be one durable answer. 
                    Whereas in the area of desires, we think it is
                    either inescapable, or for many also desirable (a
                    self-referential value judgment) that different
                    answers coexist indefinitely.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > Eric<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> > <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >> On Jan 25, 2022, at 8:02 AM, glen
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com"><gepropella@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >><br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >> Necessary for what, though? We need the
                    shared value(s) before we can ask what response we'd
                    get from the convergence on something that might be
                    necessary to adhere to that value. Is the shared
                    value that biology on this planet should be
                    preserved and the thing we need to do is impossible?
                    Or perhaps the shared value that all "lower forms of
                    life" were simply stepping stones to the human
                    organism, but to preserve the human organism is
                    impossible? Etc.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >><br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >> As Jon likes to ask: What are we
                    optimizing? If we can't agree on that, then the
                    responses to impossibilities will be as diverse as
                    the values that underlie those impossibilities. And,
                    if that's the case, then we're back to the
                    clustering/homogenizing we see in any aspect of pop
                    culture.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >><br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >> On 1/24/22 17:21, David Eric Smith
                    wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >>> In a real situation where we
                    decided something was necessary that we believed
                    there was no way to do, somehow I feel like the same
                    movie doesn’t become the response.  Something else
                    does.  What is that?<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >><br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >> On 1/24/22 17:34, Marcus Daniels wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> >>> Before I launch into a diatribe
                    about why the hell we can't agree to basic, never
                    mind interesting things:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> -- <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> glen<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> Theorem 3. There exists a double master
                    function.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div> .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-.
                    --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 
                    bit.ly/virtualfriam<br>
                  </div>
                  <div> un/subscribe <a
                      href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div> FRIAM-COMIC <a
                      href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div> archives:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>  5/2017 thru present <a
                      href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
                      href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </span></span></span></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .---
          ..- --. .- - .<br>
        </div>
        <div>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
        </div>
        <div>Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  <a
            href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" moz-do-not-send="true">bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
        </div>
        <div>un/subscribe <a
            href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
        </div>
        <div>FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
        </div>
        <div>archives:<br>
        </div>
        <div>5/2017 thru present <a
            href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
        </div>
        <div>1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
            href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives:
 5/2017 thru present <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>