<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Source Sans Pro";}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">As Omicron was ramping up Joy Reid said something along the lines of “Is there a way to cut out a safe place to live these days [free from all the anti-vaxxer crazies]?”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That resonated with me. I think that’s a plausible way how life could be in ten years. Some municipalities & companies, maybe some states, will appeal to individuals that value, well, reason, and others will not. Then the exercise
becomes one of which brands are in some sense profitable. This will of course deepen polarization, but over the course of several generations the unprofitable approaches will die a desperate and lonely and death. Some of the woke brands won’t make it,
but neither will some of the reactionary brands. It is not clear what will happen to the federal government during this time, perhaps the kind of oscillation the author imagines. The trick will be to insulate oneself from it until the political power
of the crazies is ground down by repeated failure and steadily decreasing economic power.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Friam <friam-bounces@redfish.com> <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Steve Smith<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, February 4, 2022 8:32 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> friam@redfish.com<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [FRIAM] Democracy in Name Only: endemic regime instability<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Someone here is more likely than I to have actually read Ziblatt and Levitsky's
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Democracies_Die#:~:text=How%20Democracies%20Die%20is%20a,process%20to%20increase%20their%20power.">
How Democracies Die</a> </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#172B4D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">A recent article (behind a subscribe-wall) included the following quote:</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#172B4D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#172B4D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;color:black"><a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2022-01-20/americas-coming-age-instability">https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2022-01-20/americas-coming-age-instability</a></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:13.5pt">America may no longer be safe for democracy, but it remains inhospitable to autocracy.</span></i><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Rather than autocracy, the United States appears headed toward endemic regime instability.
</span></i><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Such a scenario would be marked by frequent constitutional crises, including contested or stolen elections and severe conflict between presidents and Congress (such as impeachments and executive efforts
to bypass Congress), the judiciary (such as efforts to purge or pack the courts), and state governments (such as intense battles over voting rights and the administration of elections). The United States would likely shift back and forth between periods of
dysfunctional democracy and periods of competitive authoritarian rule during which incumbents abuse state power, tolerate or encourage violent extremism, and tilt the electoral playing field against their rivals.</span></i><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;color:black">I found this characterization of our plight very compelling, if also very disturbing.</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;color:black">It seems as if we have "tumbled our gyros" but in a different mode than the rhetoric about "Civil War" and "Descent into Autocracy" seem to suggest. It also characterizes
a lot of the aspiring/limping democracies we know of in the world today up to and including extreme examples such as Russia which fits the DINO (democracy in name only) label pretty well.</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;color:black">This conception of the problem lead me to a very well written HS student-essay by the same title:
<a href="https://hac.bard.edu/amor-mundi/democracy-in-name-only-2020-01-02">democracy-in-name-only</a>.</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;color:black">Within this essay was a poignant quote:</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><br>
</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Source Sans Pro",sans-serif">In the words of Alexis de Tocqueville,</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Source Sans Pro",sans-serif;color:#222222">“A new science of politics is needed for a new world. This, however, is what we think of least; launched in the middle of a rapid stream, we obstinately
fix our eyes on the ruins which may still be descried upon the shore we have left, while the current sweeps us along, and drives us backward toward the gulf.”<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>