<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Thanks to Glen's clear/concise response to my fence-sitting
      contemplations I <font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace"><virtue-signal></font>
      <i>left twitter myself...</i><font face="Courier New, Courier,
        monospace"></virtue-signal></font> <br>
    </p>
    <p>I only had 123 tweets and 22 followers after 12+ years on the
      platform so I surely won't miss it much.   Several of my "follows"
      were of folks I haven't seen or heard from in most of a decade...
      I guess since I was able to "unfollow" them they must still have
      accounts, even if they themselves haven't tweeted in all that
      time.   I'm pretty sure I was following Glen but had no indication
      he had left and was simply not on my "followed" list...  
      unsurprising that Twitter would support all of us leaving as
      silently as possible.<br>
    </p>
    <p>I appreciate Marcus point about twitter having it's "finger on
      the (im)pulse" of a huge subset of the first world's
      population.     I'll be waiting with 'bated breath to see how much
      of a "great resignation" actually happens.   Reminds me of a
      dystopian version of Brunner's "Hearing Aid" or 999-999-9999
      service in Proto-Cyberpunk <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shockwave_Rider">Shockwave
        Rider</a>.<br>
    </p>
    <p>In the process of making sure I understood how to *deactivate* I
      read a few dozen tweets (mostly) by right-wing-loons saying "good
      riddance" to the Libs/Dems/Snowflakes, etc.   This naturally
      increased my resolve.   I think I'd be happy to concede *this*
      town square to become another Parler/TruthSociopath/etc.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>I obviously never found Twitter that useful to myself so no "town
      square" there for me anyway, unless you call a rolling
      street-brawl your kind of town-square. I put away my own brass
      knuckles long ago.  FB had the same structure/experience for me...
      maybe worse since the size of the payloads were so much greater.</p>
    <p>Most of the folks I'd crow to about leaving Twitter would never
      have signed up in the first place...   so I suppose this is my
      only "crow" <CAW !><br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/31/22 11:39 AM, Marcus Daniels
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:BEC0FEF4-58CC-49C7-9144-A6444AEB1E69@snoutfarm.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      I guess it is the data he is after.  People posting on Twitter are
      being selected for impulsiveness due to limited message length.
       Having models of hundreds of millions of individuals’ impulses
      could be valuable to all sorts of organizations.
      <div>
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
          <blockquote type="cite">On Oct 31, 2022, at 10:28 AM, Steve
            Smith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com"><sasmyth@swcp.com></a> wrote:<br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <p>Great quote from CDs screed:</p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><span style="color: rgb(26, 26, 26); font-family:
                  "Lucida Console", Monaco, monospace;
                  font-size: 16px; font-style: normal;
                  font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps:
                  normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal;
                  orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
                  text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
                  word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
                  background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
                  text-decoration-thickness: initial;
                  text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
                  initial; display: inline !important; float: none;">"Every
                  billionaire is a policy failure, but every billionaire
                  is also a factory for producing policy failures at
                  scale."</span></p>
            </blockquote>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">I think this logic held for
              *millionaires* at the turn of the *previous* century but I
              doubt it will take until 2100 to raise the exponent from 6
              to 9 to 12 (trillionaire)?</div>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Anyone else read Gibson's
              "Jackpot" series or at least start watching "The
              Peripheral" on Netflix?   Their dystopian 2100 feels
              *almost* Utopian compared to what I sometimes feel is
              looming on the horizon. 
              <br>
            </div>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Musk/Tesla, I think I now
              understand better how the died-in-wool capitalists who
              love-to-hate Musk choose to make their money on his
              coat-tails by *shorting* against the volatility he
              generates with his dumb-Tweets (everything from 420 to
              challenging Putin to resolve Ukraine through personal
              combat to suggesting Zelensky give over disputed
              territories to the latest Pelosi-conspiracy-talk).  Buh!<br>
            </div>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/31/22 7:50 AM, glen
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite"
              cite="mid:092a83e9-78cd-3fdf-ac3b-1b87b7fa63de@gmail.com">
              Do you get this: <br>
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://theweek.com/speedreads/972170/peter-thiels-largest-disclosed-political-donation-ever-possible-jd-vance-senate-run"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://theweek.com/speedreads/972170/peter-thiels-largest-disclosed-political-donation-ever-possible-jd-vance-senate-run</a>
              <br>
              <br>
              Doctorow has an interesting take: <br>
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/26/boxed-in/"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/26/boxed-in/</a>
              <br>
              "The Uihleins are ideologues, but it's a mistake to view
              their authoritarianism, antisemitism, racism, and
              homophobia as the main force of their ideology. First and
              foremost is their belief that they deserve to be rich, and
              that the rich should be in charge of everyone else." <br>
              <br>
              I'm not convinced. But it's plausible. What do Musk,
              Thiel, and the Uihleins have in common? They *probably*
              think they're better at something than the rest of us.
              What is that something they think they're better at? If
              you answer that, then maybe it'll explain why Musk bought
              Twitter? <br>
              <br>
              On 10/31/22 06:42, Marcus Daniels wrote: <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">I don’t get it.  It seems
                undisciplined to put his successful companies at risk to
                buy this money loser, while at the same time getting all
                this bad press.
                <br>
                <br>
                <blockquote type="cite">On Oct 31, 2022, at 5:11 AM,
                  glen <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                    href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
                    <gepropella@gmail.com></a> wrote: <br>
                  <br>
                  Yeah, I deleted all my Tweets, unfollowed everyone,
                  and removed all my followers. Musk is an asshole. I
                  know my lack of participation means nothing. But at
                  least I won't be (as) complicit. There are no good
                  billionaires
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="https://patrioticmillionaires.org/2022/09/21/dont-trust-the-good-billionaires/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
<https://patrioticmillionaires.org/2022/09/21/dont-trust-the-good-billionaires/></a>.<br>
                  <br>
                  It's interesting how, in some cases, the existence of
                  the most horrible of any species (e.g. Uihlein
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                    href="https://www.propublica.org/article/uline-uihlein-election-denial"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
<https://www.propublica.org/article/uline-uihlein-election-denial></a>)
                  can make the others seem "good". It's like a murderer
                  saying "At least I'm not a rapist." Or a rapist saying
                  "At least I'm not a pedophile." And a pedophile saying
                  "At least I don't kill 'em." Honor among thieves. <br>
                  <br>
                  As SteveS mentioned earlier, I'm almost diametrically
                  opposed to effective altruism for exactly this reason.
                  The argument is basically: Hustle! Then Dole. I'm
                  willing to change my mind.
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/YgbpxJmEdFhFGpqci/winners-of-the-ea-criticism-and-red-teaming-contest"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/YgbpxJmEdFhFGpqci/winners-of-the-ea-criticism-and-red-teaming-contest</a><br>
                  <br>
                  Even when we give Billionaires [ptouie] the benefit of
                  the doubt, forgive them for their rapacious and
                  exploitative methods, and
                  <br>
                  say "At least they're doing Good Things, now", the
                  Hustle! Then Dole lifestyle hones/perfects dystopian
                  Taylorism
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                    href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Winslow_Taylor"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Winslow_Taylor></a>. It's
                  only when these old codgers begin to see Death a
                  little more clearly, do they discover some sort of
                  moral frame, while (metaphorically) meditating at the
                  edge of their infinity pool built on the ridgeline of
                  some desert mountain range. And, as we see in Musk,
                  their lifetime of isolation within the outsized scope
                  of their own influence (because, well, money is God,
                  omnipresent, omniscient, etc.), puts them at risk of
                  dimension reducing attractors like most individualist,
                  right-wing causes. E.g. "free speech" (distinct from
                  free speech, with no quotes).
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote type="cite">On 10/30/22 11:37, Jochen
                    Fromm wrote: <br>
                    Until now I have used 3 Twitter accounts for
                    scientific, development and personal stuff. I have
                    used them more frequently since Google+ was shut
                    down. One main reason why I do not use Facebook or
                    Instagram is Mark Zuckerberg. As Grady Booch used to
                    say "Facebook is a profoundly unethical company, and
                    it starts at the top, with Mark Zuckerberg".
                    <br>
                    For Twitter it is similar now. I really don't want
                    to support a platform that belongs to someone who
                    likes to insult others, like Garry Kasparov or the
                    real Tesla founder Martin Eberhard or many others,
                    just the way Trump likes to do it.
                    <br>
                    The note for advertisers was plain marketing. His
                    intention to save the world? A lie. This town square
                    stuff? Nonsense. He certainly didn't write this, it
                    was more likely written by Twitter's CCO Sarah
                    Personette and her team. However, he has created his
                    own hell by buying the platform he is addicted to. <br>
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/28/23428132/elon-musk-twitter-acquisition-problems-speech-moderation"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/28/23428132/elon-musk-twitter-acquisition-problems-speech-moderation</a>
                    <br>
                    I am using Mastodon instead now, which does not
                    belong to an egomanic or eccentric billionaire. Yes,
                    it is named after an animal which died out at the
                    end of the Pleistoscene, but the distributed and
                    decentralized approach is much better than having
                    one big centralized system. My new Mastodon accounts
                    are here: <br>
                    fediscience.org/@cas_group <br>
                    berlin.social/@JochenFromm <br>
                    ruby.social/@jofr <br>
                    -J. <br>
                    -------- Original message -------- <br>
                    From: Steve Smith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                      href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">
                      <sasmyth@swcp.com></a> <br>
                    Date: 10/30/22 6:50 PM (GMT+01:00) <br>
                    To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
                    Group <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                      href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">
                      <friam@redfish.com></a> <br>
                    Subject: [FRIAM] (not) leaving Twitter <br>
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                      href="https://mashable.com/article/please-stop-tweeting-leaving-twitter"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://mashable.com/article/please-stop-tweeting-leaving-twitter</a>
                    <br>
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mashable.com/article/i-was-going-to-quit-twitter-but-elon-musk-takeover"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://mashable.com/article/i-was-going-to-quit-twitter-but-elon-musk-takeover</a>
                    <br>
                    I have a *very* limited twitter engagement myself. 
                    Same with FB and *zero* with anything else *but*
                    Instagram where I restrict myself to viewing and
                    posting and liking the equivalent of "family"
                    snapshots for my family and closer friends.
                    <br>
                    I tried *mostly* to ignore the implications of a
                    Musk privatization-takeover of Twitter during all
                    the on-again off-again period but/and now as it has
                    become a "done deal" I feel more able to engage in
                    thinking about that (unable to avoid thinking about
                    that?).  I thought I might de-activate/delete my
                    nearly unused account when I discovered that I had a
                    renewed interest (morbid fascination) in watching it
                    spin out (decohere) or not from the front row.   I
                    found myself looking for whether Musk's magic pixie
                    dust would somehow trigger a phase transition
                    (likely there will be one, but probably not the kind
                    most of us hope for).
                    <br>
                    Earlier discussions on *this* forum touched on what
                    would make for a proper *metaverse* (not the one
                    Zuckerberg is trying to create from whole-cloth).  
                    My (very loose) engagement with the Cardano/Catalyst
                    work and interest in blockchain is motivated by this
                    as well. <br>
                    Musk's attempts to characterize Twitter as a "town
                    square" feels very off-base in many ways:
                    <br>
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-twitter-is-unlikely-to-become-the-digital-town-square-elon-musk-envisions/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-twitter-is-unlikely-to-become-the-digital-town-square-elon-musk-envisions/</a><br>
                    What do "town squares" look like in "company
                    towns"?    And why does most social media so often
                    feel more like a rolling street-brawl?
                    <br>
                    I worked *peripherally* on a project at LANL trying
                    to address the possibilities/implications roughly 30
                    years ago:
                    <br>
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/lib-www/pubs/00285557.pdf"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">
http://library.sciencemadness.org/lanl1_a/lib-www/pubs/00285557.pdf</a>
                    <br>
                    there were some good insights, but it was all so
                    young and fresh and raw at the same time...
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <span>-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
              -.-. --- -.. .</span><br>
            <span>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</span><br>
            <span>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
              9a-12p Zoom <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a></span><br>
            <span>to (un)subscribe
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a></span><br>
            <span>FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a></span><br>
            <span>archives:  5/2017 thru present
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a></span><br>
            <span> 1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a></span><br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
to (un)subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>