<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
How ICF might evolve into a power plant:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://firstlightfusion.com/technology/power-plant">https://firstlightfusion.com/technology/power-plant</a><br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Dec 14, 2022, at 7:16 AM, glen &lt;gepropella@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">\ufeff<span>Excellent! Thanks. I think I'll have to push this topic for another day. I've got a few more links from other fora I'll plop here just in case I only land back here if/when I pop it off the stack later:</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>https://lasers.llnl.gov/news/magnetized-targets-boost-nif-implosion-performance</span><br>
<span>https://spie.org/news/nuclear-fusion-nifs-hall-of-mirrors-may-solve-worlds-energy-crisis?SSO=1</span><br>
<span>https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-power-may-run-fuel-even-gets-started</span><br>
<span>https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/12/what-enabled-the-big-boost-in-fusion-energy-announced-this-week/</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>On 12/13/22 16:23, Steve Smith wrote:</span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I think DT refers simply to the remaining fraction of Deuterium/Tritium remaining after the reaction event (-4%) without specific accounting for remaining D vs T.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>My understanding is that D-T&nbsp; fusion occurs at a lower temperature than D-D but that once fusion commences (starting with D-T), both D-T and D-D reactions occurring in similar amounts. In laser-driven ICF (as with NIF) I believe
 the ratio of D/T is nominally 50/50 though it would seem to make sense to have a higher T to D ratio but most references I see imply equal portions.&nbsp;&nbsp; An equal number of D-D and D-T reactions would seem to consume D more quickly, though as that commences,
 the D/T ratio would go down, making D-T reactions (yet) more likely...&nbsp;&nbsp; tricky business, no wonder it has taken decades to get to this point?</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>The Wikipedia Entry on ICF is pretty good: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_confinement_fusion</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I found several popular science Articles which seem to reinforce my sense that this &quot;breakthrough&quot; is not as significant as implied:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://www.science.org/content/article/fusion-breakthrough-nif-uh-not-really</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Other interesting/relevant links regarding D-T and D-D fusion...</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263507001_Species_separation_and_modification_of_neutron_diagnostics_in_inertial-confinement_fusion/figures?lo=1</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions &lt;https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsnuclear-fusion-reactions&gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html &lt;https://science.jrank.org/pages/4732/Nuclear-Fusion-D-D-D-T-reactions.html&gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 12/13/22 4:36 PM, glen wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>That's why I asked. I guess I'll assume DT means both deuterium and tritium, not just deuterium. If you were going to track fuel use, you'd track the rarer part more closely, right?</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 12/13/22 09:22, Frank Wimberly wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>DT = deuterium?</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>---</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Frank C. Wimberly</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>140 Calle Ojo Feliz,</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Santa Fe, NM 87505</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>505 670-9918</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Santa Fe, NM</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, 10:21 AM glen &lt;gepropella@gmail.com &lt;mailto:gepropella@gmail.com&gt;&gt; wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Awesome. Thanks. I'm still trying to catch up with the QC Wormhole kerfuffle. Who knew Quanta was so click baity?</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What is &quot;DT&quot;?</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; On 12/13/22 09:02, Marcus Daniels wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; In case no one wanted to get up at 7:00am to watch DOE administrators talk:</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 1. Controlling the laser in space and time was important for maintaining symmetry.&nbsp; Timing precision of 25e-12 secs and laser spatial precision of 5e-12 meter were needed. This was thought to be the main explanation for
 the achievement.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 2. 8% more power on the laser this time</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 3. x-ray tomography is used to find flaws in the capsules.&nbsp; Developing software to do the counting.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 4. They have ongoing efforts to study the fabrication systems and their components (done in Germany) to find idiosyncrasies of each.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 5. Laser technology improvements since NIF was built which are 20% more efficient.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 6. Target cost is from labor, and it takes 7 months each</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 7. 4% of DT is burned in a shot</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 8. Machine learning ties together radiation hydrodynamics and experimental data.&nbsp;&nbsp; (It sounded preliminary.)</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 9. The (successful) capsule had more defects than previous experiments.&nbsp;&nbsp; However, previous experiments did show benefits from capsule quality.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 10. 15% of experiments are indirect drive of this kind, 15% of experiments are other approaches to ignition.&nbsp; The rest are weapons and materials characterization.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; 11. Anomalous laser directional control were problems in the summer runs.&nbsp;&nbsp; Fixed that.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>-- </span><br>
<span>\ua66e M\u0265\u01ddu \u01ddl\u01ddd\u0265\u0250u\u0287s \u025f\u1d09\u0183\u0265\u0287' \u0287\u0265\u01dd \u0183\u0279\u0250ss sn\u025f\u025f\u01dd\u0279s\u02d9 \ua66e</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .</span><br>
<span>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</span><br>
<span>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe &nbsp;&nbsp;/ &nbsp;&nbsp;Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</span><br>
<span>to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</span><br>
<span>FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</span><br>
<span>archives: &nbsp;5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</span><br>
<span>1/2003 thru 6/2021 &nbsp;http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>