<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Phellow Phriamers -</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Here are my anti-Trump ideations grounded in the SCrOTUS
decision of the day:</p>
</blockquote>
<div align="center"><font color="#9f0000">Warning, vivid imagery
which </font><br>
<font color="#9f0000">may induce <b><i>limbic chaos</i></b>!</font><br>
</div>
<hr width="100%" size="2">President Joe Biden writes the following
(official act) executive orders and proclamations:
<ol>
<ol>
<li>Officially change his name to Dark Brandon</li>
<li>pardon Joe Biden AND Dark Brandon for anything "they" might
do or have done, and specifically all of the following
"official" if otherwise illegal (partisan) acts:</li>
<ol>
<li>an open ended list of threatening and scary (and
devastating) partisan acts.</li>
<li>a hidden list paralleling the above but with trivial,
non-destructive technically similar acts to actually carry
out every few days to remind everyone of the first list and
become potential test cases for SCrOTUS to worry over.</li>
</ol>
<li>Recall all of Trump's Secret Service detail (invoke
Austerity and Small Government) from the field.</li>
<ol>
<li>Assign them to protect a mint or Ft Knox or similar.</li>
<li>Possibly leave him un-protected.<br>
</li>
<li>Possibly re-assign non-loyalists to his detail.</li>
<li>Possibly rotate them at random so he sees new faces daily.</li>
<li>Probably many of them women covering the full spectrum of
his type/not-type</li>
<ol>
<li>Have them drill with male detail members, practicing
groin-grab attacks.</li>
</ol>
<li>Include one of Biden's German Shepherds (or lookalike) on
the team.</li>
<ol>
<li>Let her sniff Trump inappropriately and often.</li>
</ol>
</ol>
<li>Alternatively declare a UFC-style hand-to-hand competition
between Trump's current (Loyalist) detail and the most elite
trained fighters in all of the Services.</li>
<ol>
<li>With blank pardons in case anyone gets hurt badly. <br>
</li>
<li>Maybe throw in some of Trump's "very tough" ringers from
the "Illegals" he fears. Dressed as Luchadors and
Luchadoras.<br>
</li>
<li>Give every Loyalist Secret Service member on Trump's
detail the option to ask (anonymously) for a new assignment
(see above) before their match.</li>
<li>Expect nothing but no-shows and a swelling in the ranks at
the mints and Ft. Knox?<br>
</li>
</ol>
<li>Alternatively call for a series of "live fire" exercises
(red team v blue team) between Trump's detail and hand-picked
top performers from the remaining pool. <br>
</li>
<ol>
<li>Blank pardon's available to Blue Team members. <br>
</li>
<li>Rules of Engagement: Tombstone: <br>
</li>
<ol>
<li>(S)He who draws first is declared a murderer</li>
<ol>
<li>otherwise self-defense. <br>
</li>
</ol>
<li>Blue team holds open pardons, Red does not.</li>
</ol>
<li>Location and timing determined by Blue team. <br>
</li>
<ol>
<li>Mar a Lago at 3 AM</li>
<li>Any Trump property at any time</li>
<li>Any airfield where TrumpForceOne lands.</li>
</ol>
<li>Collateral damage to civilians present also covered by
pre-pardon.</li>
<li>Judicious use of non-lethal but humiliating weapons and
techniques.<br>
</li>
</ol>
</ol>
</ol>
<p>Remember, none of these acts need actually be executed (except
maybe 2.2) , just laid out in a convincing manner. The *targets*
needn't be limited to the *former* President, just to keep the
worst actors in the MAGA camp on their toes. Jim Jordan invited
to "wrestle" for Trump Team with a tag team of Luchadors like El
Santo and the Blue Demon whose backstory includes being abused by
their wrestling coach as young teens. And who gets to (mud)
wrestle with MTG, maybe Luchadora Rubí ? And LIndsay Graham? a
whole tag team of mostly naked Luchadors who are especially
trained to be "firm but gentle" with him, maybe even pass him
around a circle?<br>
</p>
<p>Or maybe a series of SWATtings with a mysterious "man in black"
(MIB) standing back supervising the operation? Preferably the
MIB is a man with a slim build, grey hair, a crooked smile and
aviator glasses. Maybe laser-pointers in his AR glasses such
than wherever those laser dots land, the SWAT team gives the
individual a little "extra" attention? Lots of wet-noodle,
limp-dishrag "smacking around". No significant damage, maybe
just lots of humiliation. Maybe clips from the body-cams of the
SWATs automatically submitted to SCOTUS and Faux News for review
to see if anyone step over the "official acts" line (with a copy
of the executive order giving them permission to bitchslap each of
the individuals named and an open pardon in case they somehow
overstep, etc."</p>
<p>Jeffries and Harris (as President of Senate) draft legislation
forbidding all this kind of shite (and the kind MAGA is ideating
on as well) for the full bodies to vote on. Maybe we can slam a
few loopholes shut in a hurry?<br>
</p>
<p>Sort of an absurdist Krystalnacht of the Spotless Mind for the
MAGAs?</p>
<p>No end <i>of the fun to be had</i> inside the "Unbearable
Lightness of MY Spotless Mind" when these Socio-Political-Cultural
inflection points pass before it. I should probably turn off all
the (physical) screens in my view and let the virtual ones inside
my skull wind down a little? <br>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Oh, but the limbic chaos it engenders!<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>- Stave<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/1/24 10:32 AM, Marcus Daniels
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:MN0PR11MB5985C873A140F06E2D5DD8F3C5D32@MN0PR11MB5985.namprd11.prod.outlook.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Besides the heroic act of following LBJ, another one could be to deal with Trump. Hard to punish an old person with threat of incarceration. His defense could last years until he died, and meanwhile they argue diminished capacity. Let's go Dark Brandon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"><friam-bounces@redfish.com></a> On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 9:25 AM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com">friam@redfish.com</a>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [un]official disambiguation?
I don't think so. E.g. Trump's threat to fire the AG for not opening investigations seems official, if a bit unethical. So the righties' rhetoric about "Biden's persecution of Trump" is nonsense. It would (now) be a clearly official act for Biden to threaten the AG for refusing to open an investigation into Trump. But the conclusions of that investigation are another matter. The effects of such acts percolate down through the admin, then back up through the courts. What's missing in action is the 3rd branch, here. And I think it's safe to claim the Senate bears most of the responsibility for a defunkt legislature.
Anyway, the hysteria on all sides to this ruling seem similar to the Dems' hysteria w.r.t. Biden's debate performance. It's like everyone's lost their executive function. I'm starting to think we need to send every citizen through pilot training so they can learn to stay calm under duress ... and I'm normally the first to insult the Rationalists. 8^D
On 7/1/24 08:49, Marcus Daniels wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">The "outer perimeter" would allow Biden to through Trump in a dungeon, etc. No?
-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"><friam-bounces@redfish.com></a> On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 7:59 AM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com">friam@redfish.com</a>
Subject: [FRIAM] [un]official disambiguation?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/01/supreme-court-trump-immunity-claim-decision-updates#top-of-blog">https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/01/supreme-court-trump-immunity-claim-decision-updates#top-of-blog</a>
Anyone care to take a stab at explaining why the ruling doesn't simply kick the can down the road a bit? I mean, how could (say) hiding secret documents, riot incitation at a campaign event, etc. be considered official acts of the Office of the President? I suppose I can see some of the evidence being thrown out, like claims about POTUS not getting involved in protecting the Capitol building. But is this ruling really that damaging to the prosecution's case?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
to (un)subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives: 5/2017 thru present <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
1/2003 thru 6/2021 <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>