<div dir="ltr">Nick <br><br>you wrote:<br><b>>  In reply, I only would say that if somebody were willing to ask me short, to-the-point questions about my thinking on any matter and explore carefully my answers, I would eternally grateful.   I might even cuddle with them in a thunderstorm.<br></b><br>Based on your request above, Dan created 5 questions for you. Please answer by moving the sliders and hit the button to copy the results and email it to the list. I promise to carefully consider your answers. I asked Dan to do his best to partition the consciousness space to understand where you are coming from and give the closest philosophers to your thinking. Any issue with the questions, partitioning or philosopher vectors we can follow up with Dan.<div><br><div>Consciousness Questions:<a href="https://guerin.acequia.io/consciousnessTensor.html"> https://guerin.acequia.io/consciousnessTensor.html</a> <br>(from the AI maker that brought you Elf Selector)<br><br>others are welcome to post their results. Dan may create a group report with enough samples...<br><br><img src="cid:ii_lyhw9r880" alt="image.png" width="355" height="345" style="margin-right: 0px;"><br><a href="https://guerin.acequia.io/consciousnessTensor.html">https://guerin.acequia.io/consciousnessTensor.html</a><br><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">_________________________________________________________________<br>Stephen Guerin<br>CEO, Founder <br><a href="https://simtable.com" target="_blank">https://simtable.com</a><br><a href="mailto:stephen.guerin@simtable.com" target="_blank">stephen.guerin@simtable.com</a> <br><br><div><a href="mailto:stephenguerin@fas.harvard.edu" target="_blank">stephenguerin@fas.harvard.edu</a><br><a href="https://hwpi.harvard.edu/eps-visualization-research-laboratory/home" target="_blank">Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab</a><br><div><div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br>mobile: (505)577-5828</span></div><div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:55 PM Nicholas Thompson <<a href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Steve, <br></div><div><br></div><div>The scale of your response alone suggests that it cannot be baby steps.   <br></div><div><br></div><div>I guess I am proposing a method here, one inn we work outward from an evocative experience to explore our understandings of contraversial concepts, and that we do it in relatively short bursts.  <br></div><div><br></div><div><b><i>Dusty comes to cuddle with David when she hears thunder.</i></b></div><div><b><i>Does Dusty love David?</i></b></div><div><b><i><br></i></b></div><div>If yes, what else would you expect Dusty to do with  respect to David. given you have made that attribution.<br></div><div>If no, what more would have Dusty have to do, before you would make such an attribution.</div><div><br></div><div>I would like to respond to an inference that there is something patronizing about my insisting on a method, as if  I think you need thought-therapy and I am the guy to give it.  In reply, I only would say that if somebody were willing to ask me short, to-the-point questions about my thinking on any matter and explore carefully my answers, I would eternally grateful.   I might even cuddle with them in a thunderstorm.</div><div><br></div><div>NIck <br></div><div><br></div><div>Nick <br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:05 PM steve smith <<a href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com" target="_blank">sasmyth@swcp.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
    <p>Nick -</p>
    <p>I'm glad you acknowledged (in another branch of this thread?) the
      "grumpiness" aspect of your initiation/participation in this
      thread.  Your analogy around thought/feeling "expression" and that
      of pimple popping is in fact very apt if a bit graphic.  I do
      think many of us want this apparently deeply thorny/paradoxical
      problem to be easier than it is?   And the plethora of complexly
      subtle dis/mis-agreements on language around consciousness,
      intelligence, cognition, (self) awareness, qualia complicates that
      yet more.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>I don't know if my own baby-steps are helpful, given that my
      background/perspective might align more with DaveW than most
      others here (I'm very sympathetic with a pan-consciousness
      perspective)?  maybe it parses as baby-babble more than
      baby-steps...<br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">I
          missed most of this (and related) threads but am surprised at
          where this seems to be going. I always associated
          consciousness with subjective experience and not necessarily
          with self awareness. The "hard problem of consciousness" is
          qualia, not self-awareness. No? An AI agent cannot
          understand language on anything other than a superficial basis
          because it has no idea what, for example "wet," means.
          Nevertheless, it will be quite good at stringing words
          together that say coherent things about wetness. An AI agent
          has no <i>idea </i>about anything. At the same time, an AI
          agent will be quite good at creating coherent statements about
          very many things. Just because an AI agent is able to create
          coherent statements does not mean that those
          statements reflect the agent's ideas--since it has no ideas.</div>
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>
                                <div dir="ltr">
                                  <div>
                                    <div dir="ltr">
                                      <div dir="ltr">
                                        <div dir="ltr">
                                          <div dir="ltr">
                                            <div dir="ltr">
                                              <div dir="ltr">
                                                <div dir="ltr">
                                                  <div dir="ltr">
                                                    <div dir="ltr">
                                                      <div dir="ltr">
                                                        <div dir="ltr">
                                                          <div dir="ltr"><font><u><br>
                                                          </u></font></div>
                                                        </div>
                                                      </div>
                                                    </div>
                                                  </div>
                                                </div>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                        </div>
                                      </div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Russ's  point here is a good pivot point for me in this
      conversation if it is possible to make the pivot.  It may not be. 
      <br>
    </p>
    <p>Knowing and Knowing-About:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>  I use the former to be the quality of qualia... not easily
        formalizeable nor quantifiable nor with obvious models which are
        not intrinsically subjective.   "Knowing-About" is for me
        reserved for the formalized models of "facts about the world and
        relations between ideas" and when I say "formalized" I don't
        preclude storytelling or the highly vilified "just so
        stories".   <br>
      </p>
      <p>Formalized mathematical, statistical, logical models with
        digital computer simulations (or analog electronic, mechanical,
        hydraulic, pneumatic "circuits" or "systems")  are "knowing
        about"...  a steam train for example embodies "knowing about"
        converting carbon-fuel into linear motion across long distances,
        carrying heavy loads by way of many repeatable mechanisms...  
        the implementation and operation of such a device/system is a
        "proof" in some sense of the design.  <br>
      </p>
      <p> On top of that design/system are other design/systems (say the
        logic of Railroad Robber Baronages) upon which yet other systems
        (say Industrial-revolution era proto-hyper-capitalism) on top of
        which rides trans-global corporatism and nationalism in their
        own "gyre and gimbal"  with a in intra-stellar and eventually
        inter-stellar variation in the sense of Asimov's Foundation and
        Empire or perhaps for the youth culture here (under 60?) George
        Lucas' Star Wars Empire or Roddenberry's Star Trek Federation vs
        ???   <br>
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Consciousness:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>A the lowest level consciousness or perhaps proto-consciousness
        registers for me as "having a model of the world useful for
        guiding behaviour toward
        surviving/thriving/reproducing/collectivizing".     This
        permeates all of life from somewhere down at the single-celled
        bacteria/archaea/fungi/phyto-thingies/  up to and through
        vertebrates/mammals/hominids/sapiens  <br>
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <blockquote>
      <p>On the reflection of whether my cat or dog, or the hummingbirds
        outside my window or the mice trying to sneak back into my house
        have "consciousness", or even more pointedly the mosquito I
        slapped into a blood (my blood by the way) spot on my forearm
        last night, have "consciousness"...   while each of these appear
        to have a "consciousness" I know it to be variously more or less
        familiar to my own.   My elaborate (unfettered?) imagination
        allows me to make up (just so?) stories about how cetaceans,
        cephalapods, jellyfish all variously have aspects of their
        "consciousness' that I could (do?) recognize (empathize
        with?).   So I would want a multivalued function with at least
        two simple scalars: Familiarity-to-Me(Conscioiusness) and
        Potency-of(Consciousness), pick your scale... my identical twin
        or maybe conjoined twin might max out on the first scale while a
        nematode or a bacterium might trail off toward nil on the first
        AND second scale.  And beyond the scale of organic life into
        artificial life and  beyond, the "familiarity" of a glider or
        oscillator in the GameO'Life or the braided rings of Saturn,
        even less significant but not zero?   The Potency-scale seems to
        be something like *agency* which feels absolute for most of us
        except Robert Sapolsky while the *agency* of an electron or
        neutrino seems registered at *absolute zero*, though the Quantum
        Consciousness folks maybe put it at max and our own more an
        illusive projection of that?<br>
      </p>
      <p>The idea of "collective individuation" (e.g. mashup of Eleanor
        Ostrom's collectives and Jung's individuation) suggests that
        perception, cognition, intelligence, even consciousness may well
        be a collective phenomena.   Our organs, tissues, cells,
        organelles, macromolecules, CHON++ molecules, atoms,
        baryons/fermions, quarks, strings, branes  are on a loose
        hierarchy of diminishing Familiarity-Consciousness and
        Potency-Consciousness.   I'm more interested (these days) in the
        emergent collective consciousness of the noosphere and perhaps
        the symbiotic culture of humanity and life-at-all-scales
        (SCHLAAS?)   it feels wild and science-fictiony to assert that
        earth's biosphere has already (in the last 150 years) conjured a
        nervous system, a global-brain (ala Francis Heylighen: <a rel="noreferrer">Global Brain Institute)</a></p>
      <p><a rel="noreferrer"></a><a href="https://globalbraininstitute.org/" target="_blank">https://globalbraininstitute.org/</a>
        with "our own" Bollen, Joslyn, Rodriguez still on the Board of
        Technical Advisors.   I scoffed at this somewhat 25 years ago
        (mostly because of the hubris of "Global" and "Brain")<a rel="noreferrer">.</a></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><a rel="noreferrer">OK Nick, so not "baby steps"
        more like a hyper-baby's mad dash through an obstacle course or
        maybe a pentathalon?   I tried shunting all this to George
        Tremblay IVo but he referred me to Gussie Tumbleroot who cheered
        me on on my careening ideational orbits.   <br>
      </a></p>
    <p><a rel="noreferrer">Gurgle,</a></p>
    <p><a rel="noreferrer"> - Steve<br>
      </a></p>
    <p><u><br>
      </u></p>
    <p><u><br>
      </u></p>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>
                                <div dir="ltr">
                                  <div>
                                    <div dir="ltr">
                                      <div dir="ltr">
                                        <div dir="ltr">
                                          <div dir="ltr">
                                            <div dir="ltr">
                                              <div dir="ltr">
                                                <div dir="ltr">
                                                  <div dir="ltr">
                                                    <div dir="ltr">
                                                      <div dir="ltr">
                                                        <div dir="ltr">
                                                          <div dir="ltr"><font><u>
                                                          </u></font><span>
                                                          </span>-- Russ
                                                          Abbott        
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                            <br>
                                                          Professor
                                                          Emeritus,
                                                          Computer
                                                          Science<br>
                                                          California
                                                          State
                                                          University,
                                                          Los Angeles<br>
                                                          </div>
                                                        </div>
                                                      </div>
                                                    </div>
                                                  </div>
                                                </div>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                        </div>
                                      </div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at
          9:30 AM Frank Wimberly <<a href="mailto:wimberly3@gmail.com" target="_blank">wimberly3@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div dir="ltr">Glen,
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>This is a test to illustrate somethiing about Gmail to
              Nick.</div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at
              4:37 PM glen <<a href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com" target="_blank">gepropella@gmail.com</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347215003085" target="_blank">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347215003085</a><br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div dir="auto">On July 9, 2024 2:04:29 PM PDT, Prof
                      David West <<a href="mailto:profwest@fastmail.fm" target="_blank">profwest@fastmail.fm</a>>
                      wrote:</div>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">Maybe I should not
                        be replying, as I do believe my dogs (and your
                        cat if you have one) are conscious.<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">I have not
                        experienced a Vulcan Mind-Meld with either of my
                        dogs, so I cannot say with certainty they are
                        conscious—I must infer it from observations:<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">1- interactions
                        with other dogs would seem to indicate they
                        "remember" past interactions and do not require
                        the same butt-sniffing protocol with dogs they
                        have met at the park frequently. Also they seem
                        to remember who plays with who and who doesn't.
                        "That ball is not mine, this one is."<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">2-they modify their
                        behavior depending on the tenor, sharpness, and
                        volume of barks, ear positions, tail wagging
                        differences, by the other dogs; e.g., "that's
                        enough."<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">3-They do not
                        communicate to me in English, but seem to accept
                        communication from me in that language—not
                        trained responses to commands, but "listening to
                        conversations" between myself and Mary and
                        reacting to words (e.g., dog park) that are
                        exchanged in those conversations. Mary and I are
                        totally sedentary and speaking in conversational
                        tone, so pretty sure there we are not sending
                        'signals' akin to training words, training tone
                        of voice.<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">4-they seem to
                        remember trauma, (one of our dogs spent three
                        days with dead owner before anyone knew the
                        owner was deceased and will bite if anyone tries
                        to forcefully remove him from my (current bonded
                        owner) presence.<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">5-seek
                        "psychological comfort" by crawling into my bed
                        and sleeping on my shoulder when the
                        thunderstorm comes.<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><b><i><u>All of
                              these are grounded in
                              anthropomorphism—long considered a deadly
                              error by ethologists.</u></i></b> (Some
                        contemporary ethologists are exploring accepting
                        and leveraging this "error" to extend our
                        understanding of animal behavior.)<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial">davew<br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 2:54 PM, Nicholas
                        Thompson wrote:<br>
                      </div>
                      <blockquote type="cite" id="m_1740444598298868069m_-9126503415537066979m_6731191525240660294m_3416684508796851780qt">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>While I find all the  ancillary
                            considerations raised on the original thread
                            extremely interesting,  I would like to
                            reopen the discussion of Conscious as a
                            Mystery and ask that those that join it stay
                            close to the question of what consciousness
                            is and how we know it when we see it.  Baby
                            Steps.  <br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>Where were we?   I think I was asking
                            Jochen, and perhaps Peitr and anybody else
                            who thought that animals were not conscious
                            (i.e., not aware of their own awareness) 
                            what basis they had in experience for
                            thinking that..  One offering for such an
                            experience is the absence of language in
                            animals.  Because my cat cannot  describe
                            his experience in words, he cannot be 
                            conscious.  This requires the following
                            syllogism:<br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>Nothing that does not employ a language
                            (or two?) is conscious.<br>
                          </div>
                          <div>Animals (with ;the possible exception of
                            signing apes) do not employ languages.<br>
                          </div>
                          <div>Ergo, Animals are not conscious. <br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>But I was trying to find out the basis
                            for the first premise.  How do we know that
                            there are no non-linguistic beings that are
                            not conscious.  I hope we could rule out the
                            answer,"because they are non-linguistic", 
                            both in its strictly  tautological or merely
                            circular form. <br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>There is a closely related syllogism
                            which we also need to explore:<br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>All language using beings are conscious.<br>
                          </div>
                          <div>George Peter Tremblay IV is a
                            language-using being.<br>
                          </div>
                          <div>George Peter Tremblay IV is conscious. <br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>Both are valid syllogisms.  But where do
                            the premises come from.<br>
                          </div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>Nick<br>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                        <div>-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-.
                          ... . / -.-. --- -.. .<br>
                        </div>
                        <div>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  
                          Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>archives:  5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
                        </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                      <div style="font-family:Arial"><br>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
                -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-.
                --- -.. .<br>
                FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
                Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
                9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
                to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
                FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
                archives:  5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
                  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br clear="all">
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">Frank Wimberly<br>
              140 Calle Ojo Feliz<br>
              Santa Fe, NM 87505<br>
              505 670-9918
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Research:  <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2</a></div>
            </div>
          </div>
          -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. ---
          -.. .<br>
          FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
          Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
          Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
          to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
          FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
          archives:  5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
            1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .<br>
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .<br>
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>