<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>I guess. I don’t see much evidence that groups in any way self-correct thanks to this collective reflection. It isn’t even that frustrating. The main take home for me is to simply not to bother communicating. It’s a waste of time.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Friam <friam-bounces@redfish.com> on behalf of glen <gepropella@gmail.com><br><b>Date: </b>Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 9:54 AM<br><b>To: </b>friam@redfish.com <friam@redfish.com><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [FRIAM] This makes me think of this list...<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>IDK. It's useful to remind oneself how batshit everyone (including oneself from years ago or years from now) is. It's only frustrating when you're, as Steve put it, high on your own supply. It's funny. At the salon, when I manage to repeat back some batshit perspective one of the participants extruded onto the table, well enough such that the person who extruded the guano honestly believes I "get it" ... my closer friends looking at me like I've been body-snatched, etc. When that happens, I can't help but wonder why these people are all so convinced of their own views.<br><br>People are just weird. It's not a campaign slogan. It's the truth.<br><br>On 8/15/24 08:45, Marcus Daniels wrote:<br>> I feel I should scream on Eric’s behalf.<br>> <br>> *From:*Friam <friam-bounces@redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Santafe<br>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 14, 2024 9:31 PM<br>> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com><br>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] This makes me think of this list...<br>> <br>> Cool. Nepal even has mystical hillsides.<br>> <br>> My colleage The Mystic has informed me that only we (in “the west” in “the modern era") are degraded and malformed people; all other cultures have Wisdom Traditions. So any child in one of those Other Cultures already has an understanding of Reality that all of us Westerners are incapable of achieving because we grew up in the absence of Wisdom Traditions. It kind of reminds me of the Krell in whatever film it was. (Forbidden planet?)<br>> <br>> I have often wondered what I am supposed to do with declarations like that one. I have to accept that it is true, since he has told me that he has an apprehension of Reality, but that it could not explained to me, because that’s not how those apprehensions work. Hopefully the Noema mag will provide further input, when I can get time to read it.<br>> <br>> Eric<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> On Aug 15, 2024, at 2:38, Roger Critchlow <rec@elf.org <<a href="mailto:rec@elf.org">mailto:rec@elf.org</a>>> wrote:<br>> <br>> <a href="https://www.noemamag.com/exploring-the-boundaries-of-consciousness/">https://www.noemamag.com/exploring-the-boundaries-of-consciousness/</a> <<a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.noemamag.com%2fexploring-the-boundaries-of-consciousness%2f&c=E,1,JPgTSlb6W5BoLUrZDMDHXpPYcHDxQIowhbHRnbBn9D_s7Owuzgw3iIapMGGo0msXQyFsLwcfkxz5zG4x1AocbX1T_E7qze8Fajc2H8A_rkZ9GB_yCA,,&typo=1">https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.noemamag.com%2fexploring-the-boundaries-of-consciousness%2f&c=E,1,JPgTSlb6W5BoLUrZDMDHXpPYcHDxQIowhbHRnbBn9D_s7Owuzgw3iIapMGGo0msXQyFsLwcfkxz5zG4x1AocbX1T_E7qze8Fajc2H8A_rkZ9GB_yCA,,&typo=1</a>><br>> <br>> Whaddya know, its on topic.<br>> <br>> -- rec --<br>> <br>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 2:11 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus@snoutfarm.com <<a href="mailto:marcus@snoutfarm.com">mailto:marcus@snoutfarm.com</a>>> wrote:<br>> <br>> Claude remarks:<br>> <br>> << Good Soldier Švejk might respond to questions about consciousness and information determinism with a seemingly irrelevant anecdote, perhaps about a drunk man convinced his goldfish was controlling his thoughts through "information in the water." >><br>> <br><br><br>-- <br>ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ<br><br>-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .<br>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>archives: 5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></body></html>