<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Marcus -</p>
    <p>I totally defer to your brand of "morbid fascination".   I have
      my own deep streak but I think it is interrupted by a
      cross-cutting vein of hopium-rich optimism.  Your pithy "worst
      case/best case" ideations are exquisite.</p>
    <p>I will argue (against my own technophobic/neoLuddite nature) that
      you might be too optimistic when you refer to it as a "last
      chapter of my life"...   <br>
    </p>
    <p>The technoutopian movement we have all had our part in very
      likely may sweep you into a psuedo-uncountable string of birthdays
      out into the future.   <br>
    </p>
    <p>Following your arc, however I agree that whether it is climate
      catastrophe or societal collapse may take most if not all of us
      out before our self-trimming telomeres and rundown of
      endocrine/metabolic systems bring us to heel as God (nod to DaveW)
      intended somewhere during the begetting, begatting and begotting
      of the long-lived Old Testament Patriarchs if not as he booted
      (does God wear Boots?) us out of his Walled Garden.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>- Steve<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/31/24 9:20 AM, Marcus Daniels
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:MN0PR11MB59850FBF402636CD81BB605BC5552@MN0PR11MB5985.namprd11.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Aptos;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}</style>
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">An upside I
            could see of another Trump presidency is that economic
            productivity in the United States would further consolidate.
              States and municipalities would evolve more defensive
            mechanisms to preserve productivity and health of its
            businesses and residents.    Areas that did not, would
            continue their downhill slide.   As it became clear the
            national democracy didn’t work, the federal budget would
            become increasingly restricted.   Medicare and Social
            Security would fall being replaced by state-level
            programs.    At some point the U.S. starts defaulting on its
            debt.  What’s not clear to me is how to break up the
            military and the nuclear arsenal.    (About now I bet
            Ukraine regrets their decision..)  I could see that
            functions like the FAA or the FDA could be coordinated.   <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">My sense is
            that, well, about 50% of the population in the United States
            just isn’t worth the trouble.   AI is going to make a lot of
            jobs unnecessary.   Maybe Trump catalyzes a dramatic change
            in society?   It could all be a fascinating, if terrifying,
            final chapter in my life?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
          1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
              Friam <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"><friam-bounces@redfish.com></a> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Pieter
              Steenekamp<br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 31, 2024 7:38 AM<br>
              <b>To:</b> The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
              Group <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"><friam@redfish.com></a><br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [FRIAM] What if Trump Wins?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">The Case for Trump<br>
            <br>
            I'm not suggesting that Trump is a model leader; he has many
            moral shortcomings. And yes, if we view the U.S. President
            as the de facto leader of the West, it's fair to ask: Can’t
            we do better? I also won’t debate whether someone like
            Harris might make a better president. My point is this: If
            Trump is elected, might there be areas where his unique
            style could actually make him an effective leader?<br>
            <br>
            One thing Trump can do is negotiate. As a potential leader
            of the West, there are benefits he could bring in
            negotiating with adversaries, including BRICS countries. Let
            me explain using an analogy: the character James Dean played
            in Rebel Without a Cause. In a game of chicken, Dean's
            character pretended to be drunk, making his opponent believe
            he was reckless—eventually causing them to back down.<br>
            <br>
            Trump has a history of employing similar tactics. For
            instance, when building in New York, he once proposed a
            design that violated height limits. When this was denied, he
            proposed a much uglier building that followed the code.
            Ultimately, he got approval to build his original design,
            with the height exemption he wanted. Whether or not he would
            have gone through with his threat is unclear, but he got
            what he wanted by throwing a calculated tantrum.<br>
            <br>
            In the same way, Trump's current claims about what he would
            do internationally could simply be part of his proven
            negotiation tactics. World leaders see him as “reckless” in
            the same way James Dean’s opponents did, making them
            reconsider their own moves. <br>
            <br>
            Ultimately, Trump may be an unconventional choice, but he is
            a skilled negotiator—one who could, in his own way, secure
            some advantageous outcomes for the West.<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 13:07, Santafe
              <<a href="mailto:desmith@santafe.edu"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">desmith@santafe.edu</a>>
              wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
            1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
            6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
            <p class="MsoNormal">The newspapers, and any number of
              writers, do a good job spelling all this out.<br>
              <br>
              I have this frustrated feeling that doing this misses the
              point that is driving the dynamic.  <br>
              <br>
              One of the good things that Paxton emphasizes about what
              drives fascist movements from the ground up is the
              determined rejection of thought in favor of feeling. 
              Hannah Arendt goes on at length to get the same thing
              across.  <br>
              <br>
              I envision it (with some discomfort about misfits of the
              metaphor) as being like a social counterpart to
              berserking, or (even less apt) elephants going into
              musth.  It’s not even “rage” per se, but something about
              as destructive, only chosen.<br>
              <br>
              I see the various repubs that make communities with the
              dems, and speak as if they hope this will “accomplish”
              some “change”.  For the Bannon-followers, I feel like I
              know exactly what this looks like.  It is the various
              subcategories of hated ones self-identifying, and sewing
              on their sleeves a marker of “establishment characters”. 
              Bannon preaches to the mob:  “You see; they’re scared!  We
              have them on the run.  If you’ll just push a little harder
              we can corner them, and we’ll give them the beating of
              their lives.  Imagine how powerful you will feel.  They’ll
              want you to stop, and they won’t be faking it, but they
              won’t be able to make you stop.  Won’t that be the best
              feeling you ever had?  You’ll be able to feel, finally,
              that you actually exist.”  (Bannon doesn’t put in the
              final line; I put that in.)<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              I guess I don’t want to argue against the things people
              are trying to do (Michael Luttig, various Cheneys, and
              whoever).  The voting block that can cause the calamity is
              certainly a coalition of non-identical groups.  If we
              think there are categories of Spontaneous Racists and
              Stimulated Racists (to borrow a term from spectroscopy),
              the part of the voting bloc that is made up of the
              spontaneous ones may not be all that large; maybe 20%? 
              Not as large as the evangelicals (35–40%?, with some
              overlap).  There presumably are some genuinely
              out-to-lunch types, and maybe one can imagine that talking
              has some place with them, which could be enough to move
              the margin of this winner-take-all event we are stuck
              with.  And then the ones that can think enough to be
              strategically greedy or hoarding, but not circumspect
              enough to have every cared or understood how the society
              they suck from actually functions.  _Maybe_ talking could
              have some effect with them.  <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              I have thought, too, since some NYT article by a guy from
              Bucks county PA going home, and thinking that the trump
              voters actively wanted “the trump vibe; the meanness,
              bullying and name-calling, etc.” that this is an
              expression of a certain component of nihilism.  <br>
              <br>
              Whoever wrote the screenplay for Apocalypse Now was very
              good.  Kurtz’s line in one of the soliloquays:<br>
              <br>
              “Have you ever wondered what it would be like to be
              completely free?  Free from the judgments of others; even
              of yourself?”<br>
              <br>
              There is a core of nihilism in that freedom.  What would
              it feel like to go punch somebody for no particular
              reason, except that I felt like it?  Burn whatever some
              people mean by “the bonds of human affection” that
              “include us in humanity”.  Yes, I sort of understand (and
              this probably is important) that whoever I hit will now
              know he has to fear me, and he may even dislike or hate
              me, and it may be irreversible.  But if he can’t do
              anything to me, why do I care?  In fact, if he wants to
              and still can’t, even better: that will give me that
              experience of power that I imagine must be so nice to
              feel, but that if it is, I certainly don’t feel now.<br>
              <br>
              It’s not as simple a category as all that, because they
              are willing to do this only if they believe they are
              members in the mob.  Whether that’s community or just a
              release from the requirements of either responsibility or
              courage I can’t say.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              But I do think that, in the U.S., a crucial conversion
              that Arendt articulates, from a mere mass into a mob, has
              now been achieved, and the mob is awake and self-aware as
              a mob.  It took a sociopath to go charging out across the
              minefield that normal people are too chicken to venture
              into, to show how far out the actual shooting-boundary is,
              beyond where they had drawn back before.  But now that the
              boundary has been identified, that’s public information,
              and the others don’t need to be sociopaths to use it.  It
              changes the problem, because there are a lot more of them
              than of the true sociopaths.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              I agree, we would like to first get through the next week
              without an acute disaster.  But the system organization
              has passed through a re-arrangement by now.  I would like
              to know what a program looks like to reverse that, without
              having to go through the whole Hodgkin-Huxley circuit of
              the society’s destroying itself before there is enough
              exhaustion to try for a reset.  Since, under the
              conditions that are likely by that time, it’s not clear
              what kind of “reset” might even be available. <br>
              <br>
              Eric<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              > On Oct 31, 2024, at 4:59 AM, Russ Abbott <<a
                href="mailto:russ.abbott@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">russ.abbott@gmail.com</a>>
              wrote:<br>
              > <br>
              > To help prevent such a disaster, let's do our best to
              help people imagine what the world would look like if
              Trump wins.<br>
              > <br>
              > For example, Trump has said that one of his
              priorities would be to throw off the occupying army of
              invading immigrants and criminals. Ask people to think
              about how this occupying force is currently ruining
              people's lives. I suspect that very few people have any
              experience of such a noxious invading force. Most people
              find their lives relatively peaceful. But if Trump begins
              to implement his plan to throw off this occupying force,
              the streets would be full of armed deportation agents
              chasing down the evil occupying forces. Gunfights would
              erupt between the deportation agents and immigrants
              running for their lives. Many of us would be caught in the
              crossfire--or holed up at home trying to avoid the
              bullets. Ask people to imagine such a world and to compare
              it to the relatively peaceful world we now occupy. Ask
              them if that is really what we want and if that is what we
              will be voting for next Tuesday.<br>
              > <br>
              > -- Russ Abbott                                       <br>
              > Professor Emeritus, Computer Science<br>
              > California State University, Los Angeles<br>
              > <br>
              > <br>
              > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:48<span
                style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>PM
              Jochen Fromm <<a href="mailto:jofr@cas-group.net"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">jofr@cas-group.net</a>>
              wrote:<br>
              > Here in Europe most people are indeed worried that
              the candidate who is a convicted felon and wears orange
              makeup will become president again. Have his fans all
              forgotten he mainly played golf, praised dictators and
              created tax cuts for the superrich? But there is also a
              bit of hope that a woman will stop him this time. <br>
              > <br>
              > A hundred years ago there was already a group in
              America that hated Blacks and immigrants. As Timothy Egan
              writes in his book "A Fever in the Heartland: The Ku Klux
              Klan's Plot to Take Over America, and the Woman Who
              Stopped Them" one of the Ku Klux Klan leaders was a
              charismatic charlatan named D.C. Stephenson. He was
              eventually brought down by a woman, Madge Oberholtzer, who
              would reveal his cruelties, and whose testimony stopped
              the Klan. When Europe fell into darkness, America was able
              to stop the con man. I hope it can do it again.<br>
              > <a
href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/558306/a-fever-in-the-heartland-by-timothy-egan/"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/558306/a-fever-in-the-heartland-by-timothy-egan/</a><br>
              > <br>
              > -J.<br>
              > <br>
              > <br>
              > -------- Original message --------<br>
              > From: Nicholas Thompson <<a
                href="mailto:thompnickson2@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">thompnickson2@gmail.com</a>><br>
              > Date: 10/30/24 10:54 PM (GMT+01:00)<br>
              > To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
              Group <<a href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">friam@redfish.com</a>><br>
              > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Evolutionary transitions between
              egalitarian and despotic societies<br>
              > <br>
              > Hi, Jochen, <br>
              > <br>
              > Not sarcastic.   It was to show the exploratory
              nature of such models.   I do believe that the most
              mysterious feature of charisma is the behavior of the
              charasmees.  However this election turns out, almost half
              the country is about to willingly offer up it's political
              autonomy to a potential dictator.  Whatever my faults, I
              try, try, TRY not to do sarcasm.  I do wonder if we could
              build models that explore under what circumstances it is
              better for everybody to do SOMETHING  then to take the
              time to pool information and do the right thing.  <br>
              > <br>
              > In general evolutionary history has no actual power
              to constrain our present behavior.   Our behavior is
              constrainted by present events and present behavioral
              repertoire.  <br>
              > <br>
              > Nick <br>
              > <br>
              > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:37<span
                style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>PM
              Jochen Fromm <<a href="mailto:jofr@cas-group.net"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">jofr@cas-group.net</a>>
              wrote:<br>
              > In her book "The Social Instinct" Nichola Raihani
              mentions in chapter 17 the article "An evolutionary model
              explaining the Neolithic transition from egalitarianism to
              leadership and despotism" from Simon T. Powers as a model
              how despotic regimes and dominance hierarchies have
              evolved in early human societies.<br>
              > <a
                href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2014.1349"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2014.1349</a><br>
              > <br>
              > It reminds me of our recent discussion triggered by
              Nick's (sarcastic?) proposal to explain parts of the MAGA
              movement in terms of evolutionary psychology. Simon T.
              Powers is an interdisciplinary researcher working at the
              University of Sterling<br>
              > <a href="https://www.stir.ac.uk/people/2013555"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.stir.ac.uk/people/2013555</a><br>
              > <br>
              > A more recent article from him about "Modelling
              transitions between egalitarian, dynamic leader and
              absolutist power structures" can be found here<br>
              > <a
                href="https://www.stir.ac.uk/research/hub/publication/2041639"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.stir.ac.uk/research/hub/publication/2041639</a><br>
              > <br>
              > -J.<br>
              > <br>
              > -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
              -.-. --- -.. .<br>
              > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
              > Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
              9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
              > to (un)subscribe <a
                href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
              > FRIAM-COMIC <a
                href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
              > archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
                href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
              >  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
                href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
              > <br>
              > <br>
              > -- <br>
              > Nicholas S. Thompson<br>
              > Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology<br>
              > Clark University<br>
              > <a href="mailto:nthompson@clarku.edu"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">nthompson@clarku.edu</a><br>
              > <a href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson</a><br>
              > -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
              -.-. --- -.. .<br>
              > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
              > Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
              9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
              > to (un)subscribe <a
                href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
              > FRIAM-COMIC <a
                href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
              > archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
                href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
              >  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
                href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
              > -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
              -.-. --- -.. .<br>
              > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
              > Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
              9a-12p Zoom <a
href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,sBiGhm4GeuEKEc6z5xiA8CzwCG1thCl6P_AjSF-iz9mrBmNJLk8pAyH_hVP16UE9P_ab04-w7Ew2H9s-PSppD6MMXoj24_V8LDe_Wl-17YM,&typo=1"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,sBiGhm4GeuEKEc6z5xiA8CzwCG1thCl6P_AjSF-iz9mrBmNJLk8pAyH_hVP16UE9P_ab04-w7Ew2H9s-PSppD6MMXoj24_V8LDe_Wl-17YM,&typo=1</a><br>
              > to (un)subscribe <a
href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,eXOJE6YpC_NGwrBTh_7_tCU6klCRKnVaUYq8CRGaHB5p5t_0YhLTnsx26Apc7-Nq6vzrCTsZxlMnSnMTC-g2IUn6mAOAZY6IUVjWE1QRKIFIRfE,&typo=1"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,eXOJE6YpC_NGwrBTh_7_tCU6klCRKnVaUYq8CRGaHB5p5t_0YhLTnsx26Apc7-Nq6vzrCTsZxlMnSnMTC-g2IUn6mAOAZY6IUVjWE1QRKIFIRfE,&typo=1</a><br>
              > FRIAM-COMIC <a
href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,V1I4xsf7uAmtB9HpvGHDM2tnYOcSklHXGeQ8pgZKxpWy8qHAZJFjGhdV_Nb2vC7cPCJYmptUThS900SppXEQHbUlVFfHxTojbTCh14-c5ZzJmouC&typo=1"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,V1I4xsf7uAmtB9HpvGHDM2tnYOcSklHXGeQ8pgZKxpWy8qHAZJFjGhdV_Nb2vC7cPCJYmptUThS900SppXEQHbUlVFfHxTojbTCh14-c5ZzJmouC&typo=1</a><br>
              > archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,xjO0iUE-fNLKpPBqSs1cXLSiTtdX3jEj0dSObiTHKHslWaRwv2HUA8ZmhCpka09ZPyN3i2iquLBoUcybJKy1mRWnz-XMPAZghbwR9XIPaHnhykzI&typo=1"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,xjO0iUE-fNLKpPBqSs1cXLSiTtdX3jEj0dSObiTHKHslWaRwv2HUA8ZmhCpka09ZPyN3i2iquLBoUcybJKy1mRWnz-XMPAZghbwR9XIPaHnhykzI&typo=1</a><br>
              > 1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
                href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
              <br>
              <br>
              -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-.
              --- -.. .<br>
              FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
              Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
              9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
              to (un)subscribe <a
                href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
              FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
              archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
                href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
                1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
                href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><o:p></o:p></p>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
to (un)subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>