<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">There have always been scientists who have written irrelevant gibberish in order to get something published. Papers full of complicated jargon and complex equations which pretended to offer new insights but contributed little. In a way these scientists act like Volkswagen in the Dieselgate scandal: </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space-collapse: preserve;">in order to survive they have to create something that they can sell, but it is almost impossible, so they are cheating and lying.</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">It is obvious that the current economic system based on constant growth and exploitation of fossil fuels can not continue forever. Limitless growth in a limited world is not possible. The "Hubbert" peak for crude oil production in the US was reached in 1970, in Norway in 2000.</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicting_the_timing_of_peak_oil</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">The society we want to live in after the current one has collapsed must give people the incentive to work (unlike communism in the Soviet Union) and it must prevent the relentless exploitation of nature (unlike capitalism we have now). Collapse is natural, almost all ancient civilizations that came before us have collapsed, as Guy Middeton writes in </span><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">"</span><span style="color: var(--YLNNHc); font-family: "Google Sans", Roboto-Medium, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Understanding Collapse: Ancient History and Modern Myths"</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: var(--YLNNHc); font-family: "Google Sans", Roboto-Medium, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/understanding-collapse/E2EE38EC4CBFF30F4815879D5991D7CC</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="color: var(--YLNNHc); font-family: "Google Sans", Roboto-Medium, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><br></span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Natural ecosystems do not consume more than they give back. Every biological organism that dies is recycled and used to build new organisms. If we want to integrate our society in this only natural habitat which we have then fossil fuels must be replaced by renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and plastic waste production must be stopped, deforestation must end, agriculture must be sustainable, resources must be recycled. Paul Hawken mentions these steps in his book "Regeneration: Ending the Climate Crisis in One Generation"</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/446598/regeneration-by-hawken-paul/9780141998916</span></p><br dir="auto"><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">But it is more than just a climate crisis, it is "Civilization's Crisis: A Set Of Linked Challenges" as the book from John Scales Avery says. We have the interconnected challenges of climate crisis, refugee crisis, energy scarcity, population growth, resource depletion, poverty and economic inequality, pollution and environmental degradation, and finally the problem of war and nuclear weapons. Solving all these interconnected crises in our capitalistic economic system seems to be impossible. </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Google Sans"; white-space-collapse: preserve;">John says we need to achieve a steady state economic system.</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10501?srsltid=AfmBOopEymNyWKHnCaxz--HVIq0KJOayH5IYnOGfzHnri2zz6jeBMsEp</span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "Google Sans"; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-variant-emoji: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br></span></p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr">-J.</p><p style="margin-top:0.0pt;margin-bottom:0.0pt;" dir="ltr"><br></p><div><br></div><div align="left" dir="auto" style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Santafe <desmith@santafe.edu> </div><div>Date: 1/19/25 12:04 PM (GMT+01:00) </div><div>To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fredkin/Toffoli, Reversibility and Adiabatic Computing. </div><div><br></div></div>I think Jochen is right, that civilization will collapse. And the reason is that people keep writing articles like this one (a couple of clicks deep from Steve’s TechCrunch link)<div><div style="display: block;"><div data-url="https://www.exponentialview.co/p/reversible-computing-1" role="link" class="apple-rich-link" style="-webkit-user-select: all; -webkit-user-drag: element; display: inline-block;"><a width="300" role="button" dir="ltr" href="https://www.exponentialview.co/p/reversible-computing-1" rel="nofollow" class="lp-rich-link" style="border-radius:10px;font-family:-apple-system, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;display:block;-webkit-user-select:none;width:300px;user-select:none;-webkit-user-modify:read-only;user-modify:read-only;overflow:hidden;text-decoration:none;"><table width="300" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="lp-rich-link-emailBaseTable" style="table-layout:fixed;border-collapse:collapse;width:300px;background-color:#E5E6E9;font-family:-apple-system, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;"><tbody><tr><td align="center"><img src="cid:com_samsung_android_email_attachmentprovider_1_3548_RAW_1737291099023" alt="8dcc397c-a086-4abc-add0-ea3fa8f75082_1600x1224.png" class="lp-rich-link-mediaImage" height="150" width="300" style="width: 300px; filter: brightness(0.97); height: 150px;" onmouseover="imageMousePointerUpdate(true)" onmouseout="imageMousePointerUpdate(false)" name="com_samsung_android_email_attachmentprovider_1_3548_RAW_1737291099023"></td></tr><tr><td><table class="lp-rich-link-captionBar" style="font-family:-apple-system, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;table-layout:fixed;background-color:rgba(229, 230, 233, 1);" width="300" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" bgcolor="#E5E6E9"><tbody><tr><td class="lp-rich-link-captionBar-textStackItem" style="padding:8px 0px 8px 0px;"><div class="lp-rich-link-captionBar-textStack" style="max-width:100%;margin:0px 16px 0px 16px;overflow:hidden;"><div class="lp-rich-link-captionBar-textStack-topCaption-leading" style="word-wrap:break-word;font-weight:500;font-size:12px;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;text-align:left;"><a style="text-decoration: none" href="https://www.exponentialview.co/p/reversible-computing-1" rel="nofollow"><font style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.847059);" color="#272727">🔮 Breaking the energy barrier with reversible computing</font></a></div><div class="lp-rich-link-captionBar-textStack-bottomCaption-leading" style="word-wrap:break-word;font-weight:400;font-size:11px;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;text-align:left;"><a style="text-decoration: none" href="https://www.exponentialview.co/p/reversible-computing-1" rel="nofollow"><font style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039);" color="#808080">exponentialview.co</font></a></div></div></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></a></div></div><div>about entropy.</div><div><br></div><div>Like Charles de Gaulle’s (apocryphal?) “How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?”, how can a society continue that is committed to making entropy into voodoo?</div><div><br></div><div>Here are some old war-horses, never put out to pasture where they belong:</div><div><br></div><div><p style="line-height: 1.6em; margin: 0 0 var(--size-20) 0; color: rgb(54, 55, 55); caret-color: rgb(54, 55, 55); font-family: Spectral, serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 19px;">The law that this potential reduction in energy all depends on is the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy (unusable energy or disorder) increases over time. As a result, everything ultimately runs down and releases waste heat. </p><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><div>(my complaint is the parenthesis: entropy is not energy, usable or otherwise). And later </div><div><br></div><div><p style="line-height: 1.6em; margin: 0 0 var(--size-20) 0; color: rgb(54, 55, 55); caret-color: rgb(54, 55, 55); font-family: Spectral, serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 19px;">Landauer created a formula for the energy in joules released per binary bit deleted. If we express his original equation in natural units of energy and information, the equation is astoundingly simple:</p><p style="line-height: 1.6em; margin: 0 0 var(--size-20) 0; color: rgb(54, 55, 55); caret-color: rgb(54, 55, 55); font-family: Spectral, serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 19px;"><em style="--tw-border-spacing-x: 0; --tw-border-spacing-y: 0; --tw-translate-x: 0; --tw-translate-y: 0; --tw-rotate: 0; --tw-skew-x: 0; --tw-skew-y: 0; --tw-scale-x: 1; --tw-scale-y: 1; --tw-pan-x: ; --tw-pan-y: ; --tw-pinch-zoom: ; --tw-scroll-snap-strictness: proximity; --tw-gradient-from-position: ; --tw-gradient-via-position: ; --tw-gradient-to-position: ; --tw-ordinal: ; --tw-slashed-zero: ; --tw-numeric-figure: ; --tw-numeric-spacing: ; --tw-numeric-fraction: ; --tw-ring-inset: ; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgb(59 130 246 / 0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow-colored: 0 0 #0000; --tw-blur: ; --tw-brightness: ; --tw-contrast: ; --tw-grayscale: ; --tw-hue-rotate: ; --tw-invert: ; --tw-saturate: ; --tw-sepia: ; --tw-drop-shadow: ; --tw-backdrop-blur: ; --tw-backdrop-brightness: ; --tw-backdrop-contrast: ; --tw-backdrop-grayscale: ; --tw-backdrop-hue-rotate: ; --tw-backdrop-invert: ; --tw-backdrop-opacity: ; --tw-backdrop-saturate: ; --tw-backdrop-sepia: ;"><span style="--tw-border-spacing-x: 0; --tw-border-spacing-y: 0; --tw-translate-x: 0; --tw-translate-y: 0; --tw-rotate: 0; --tw-skew-x: 0; --tw-skew-y: 0; --tw-scale-x: 1; --tw-scale-y: 1; --tw-pan-x: ; --tw-pan-y: ; --tw-pinch-zoom: ; --tw-scroll-snap-strictness: proximity; --tw-gradient-from-position: ; --tw-gradient-via-position: ; --tw-gradient-to-position: ; --tw-ordinal: ; --tw-slashed-zero: ; --tw-numeric-figure: ; --tw-numeric-spacing: ; --tw-numeric-fraction: ; --tw-ring-inset: ; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgb(59 130 246 / 0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow-colored: 0 0 #0000; --tw-blur: ; --tw-brightness: ; --tw-contrast: ; --tw-grayscale: ; --tw-hue-rotate: ; --tw-invert: ; --tw-saturate: ; --tw-sepia: ; --tw-drop-shadow: ; --tw-backdrop-blur: ; --tw-backdrop-brightness: ; --tw-backdrop-contrast: ; --tw-backdrop-grayscale: ; --tw-backdrop-hue-rotate: ; --tw-backdrop-invert: ; --tw-backdrop-opacity: ; --tw-backdrop-saturate: ; --tw-backdrop-sepia: ;">Energy (in natural units) = Information (in nats)</span><a style="color: var(--print_pop); text-decoration: none; vertical-align: super; line-height: 0; font-size: 14px; margin-left: 4px; --tw-border-spacing-x: 0; --tw-border-spacing-y: 0; --tw-translate-x: 0; --tw-translate-y: 0; --tw-rotate: 0; --tw-skew-x: 0; --tw-skew-y: 0; --tw-scale-x: 1; --tw-scale-y: 1; --tw-pan-x: ; --tw-pan-y: ; --tw-pinch-zoom: ; --tw-scroll-snap-strictness: proximity; --tw-gradient-from-position: ; --tw-gradient-via-position: ; --tw-gradient-to-position: ; --tw-ordinal: ; --tw-slashed-zero: ; --tw-numeric-figure: ; --tw-numeric-spacing: ; --tw-numeric-fraction: ; --tw-ring-inset: ; --tw-ring-offset-width: 0px; --tw-ring-offset-color: #fff; --tw-ring-color: rgb(59 130 246 / 0.5); --tw-ring-offset-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-ring-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow: 0 0 #0000; --tw-shadow-colored: 0 0 #0000; --tw-blur: ; --tw-brightness: ; --tw-contrast: ; --tw-grayscale: ; --tw-hue-rotate: ; --tw-invert: ; --tw-saturate: ; --tw-sepia: ; --tw-drop-shadow: ; --tw-backdrop-blur: ; --tw-backdrop-brightness: ; --tw-backdrop-contrast: ; --tw-backdrop-grayscale: ; --tw-backdrop-hue-rotate: ; --tw-backdrop-invert: ; --tw-backdrop-opacity: ; --tw-backdrop-saturate: ; --tw-backdrop-sepia: ;" rel="" href="https://www.exponentialview.co/p/reversible-computing-1#footnote-1-144839107" id="footnote-anchor-1-144839107" data-component-name="FootnoteAnchorToDOM" class="footnote-anchor">1</a></em></p><p style="line-height: 1.6em; margin: 0 0 var(--size-20) 0; color: rgb(54, 55, 55); caret-color: rgb(54, 55, 55); font-family: Spectral, serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 19px;">Now, this doesn’t prove that energy and information are equivalent in the same way that Einstein proved that mass and energy were equivalent, but it is a tantalising possibility.</p></div><div><br></div><div>It’s not a tantalizing possibility. It’s a meaningless nonsense-locution that you say to people if you don’t think they could understand a correct description and don’t really care anyway. </div><div><br></div><div>The above are related to the writer (of the TechCrunch link?) saying that </div><div><br></div><div><span style="caret-color: rgb(33, 38, 35); color: rgb(33, 38, 35); font-family: nb_international_proregular, sans-serif; font-size: 19px;"> Effectively, energy is retained inside the chip instead of being released as heat.</span></div><div><br></div><div>No. There could be energy on the chip, but that’s not what the relation is about.</div><div><br></div><div>What is retained in the chip is specificity among choices. Whether or not there is any energy difference in one choice versus another has nothing to do with anything’s being “retained inside the chip”.</div><div><br></div><div>The reason Landauer’s relation (in any of its variants) holds is that, to recycle chip-state, you have to have a way to rotate the state-entropy out into a thermal bath. More specifically, there has to be a way to rotate any state from the chip into some corresponding state in the bath such that the chip is returned to a default state to receive the next inputs. Because the signal state that you are rotating out could be any allowed one, the bath-state that you need to rotate it into needs likewise to be one from an ensemble. It is to make the _bath states_ populatable that you need to supply entropy-less energy (aka work), which the bath then moves into no-longer-controlled degrees of freedom (aka heat).</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I’m not actually up on a high horse, and write as if I were mostly to make myself absurd. I really don’t care one way or another. But there is a thing in here about being real to people that seems important to me as a theoretician, as it has to do with envisioning a different world. Increasingly I have some time with Sci-Com people, and they are remarkably un-bothered by the thing that, to me, seems like the core of all later choices:</div><div><br></div><div>What if, when we talked to people, we either tried to give our best ability to be understood, or like Quakers, we just stayed quiet. The motive being that, if we aren’t giving them something we intend them to understand, then we must be doing something else. Hoping we make ourselves look smart? Fashionable? That feels icky (dishonorable) to me, in the attitude one person evidently has about others. They are there to fuel vanity; not as peers who deserve knowledge if your guild is the knowledge workers.</div><div><br></div><div>Sure, we all mess up. But our society now is structured around relations where I think people really don’t care, and this casual clowning is taken to be the default, and all fine. It makes me uncomfortable.</div><div><br></div><div>Eric</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jan 18, 2025, at 19:03, steve smith <sasmyth@swcp.com> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div>
<div><p>Pieter -</p><p>Good find. It lead me to Vaire and then to the Sandia/ABQ work
of Michael Frank who left to join/found Vaire this summer? It is
possible that my renewed interest in reversible computing might
have been triggered subliminally by some reference to
both/either? </p><p><a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/01/vaire-computing-raises-4-5m-for-reversible-computing-moonshot-which-could-drastically-reduce-energy-needs/">https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/01/vaire-computing-raises-4-5m-for-reversible-computing-moonshot-which-could-drastically-reduce-energy-needs/
<br>
</a></p><p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fvaire.co%2f&c=E,1,7Yg6L5oMzyVTF9DuV3PSwOaj-V9Ifx9465R3NgRWVhnPUMCny23gFq_YnGVxv6ZGpVLLqMfg1QaQD1BjbgxIFv1SkxLkqM3VE-jtMwEi&typo=1">https://vaire.co/</a><br>
</p><p>I thought I'd been triggered by the combination of the demands of
AI and on data centers (my daughter closed her gym of 10 years to
take a job in a data center development startup a year ago... ).
<br>
</p><p>My inability to attribute such things, parallels that of LLMs (or
more generally transformer models)?</p>
- Steve<br>
</div>
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..<br>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,CdxDQvGK-EwZVy4Dh62Vr88_4rI_EeQWk8wvgy62aA8L0A7FBsriIuHGBqMsVGQyV0IBNnoqtdsLYieD2wpFmUMkKpYo8DdJq6AWby4566tlvg,,&typo=1<br>to (un)subscribe https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,dxFGOafzQM2h2pCg07W8FhQOr3T7S6BUm7gwtCPkDguTqF6XDUnZ5a0u4UYzFZljhUAEbDA2ZVBxmTD75y6e20lVL-FmtU0vI8XhxmecpHB-YXZT&typo=1<br>FRIAM-COMIC https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,9J5kJ4jNpb5WTH8P4MqcAUphyz2P5njBVf96n2ZrV3snQ_mMwks3ITyxVH9M644mn8f-TDW6ogLbbOkSK6tcbqti4wt7x7g14BYzAyNXveyXWZfJkNT1uta375j8&typo=1<br>archives: 5/2017 thru present https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,8-rTJlMb4CPIKKvzolJDIVhjM6u2RCZGNTcSIn92ODKcto1bVHyxx5NDYzCJtHBMP-wyInKPSZRvhlZhomwdlCJbVw4MOnpDztar40RC&typo=1<br> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>