<div dir="ltr">Thanks for the reference. Stephen Wolfram is definitely one of my heroes. Count me among his enthusiastic fans, though I fully recognize (as you noted) the hubris and narcissism that often come bundled with brilliance.<br><br>I never had the privilege of meeting him, but I vividly remember buying A New Kind of Science when he self-published it in 2002. I’ve just now reopened it and was struck again by the boldness of his opening:<br><br>"Three centuries ago science was transformed by the dramatic new idea that rules based on mathematical equations could be used to describe the natural world. My purpose in this book is to initiate another such transformation, and to introduce a new kind of science that is based on the much more general types of rules that can be embedded in simple computer programs."<br><br>Modesty, clearly, has never been Wolfram's defining trait.<br><br>I'm really looking forward to watching the full interview.<br><br>Thanks again for sharing this!<br><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 21 May 2025 at 17:26, steve smith <<a href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com">sasmyth@swcp.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg1u11IHFj8" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg1u11IHFj8</a><br>
<br>
No matter your opinion of Wolfram and his works, I think this is a very <br>
insightful reflection on the history of AI as observed/experienced from <br>
his unique perspective.<br>
<br>
I met him in 1983 when he was still a "boy genius" at 24. He attended <br>
(presenting his Universality and Complexity paper) the Cellular Automata <br>
conference at LASL that year and as I remember it, he also introduced <br>
Feynman who gave his "Plenty of Room at the Bottom" lecture <br>
afterwards. Dissimilar to our current crop of "boy geniuses", he did <br>
not present with any of the "on the spectrum" affect, though his hubris <br>
and narcissism were in full display. I chose to start watching this <br>
(2.5hrs!) just to get a fresh taste of his affect, after finding him <br>
difficult unto insufferable back when New Kind of Science was still new <br>
(in spite of the work standing well on it's own).<br>
<br>
His presentation in this interview (so far - 20 mins in) reads very <br>
"matter of fact" and nearly dryly historical but (to me) factually <br>
accurate and astute. Having lived through most of the same history he <br>
presents (me mostly as an interested outsider), it is one "greatest <br>
hits" nostalgia moment after another starting with LISP and Prolog and <br>
the Japanese 5g computing aspiration, expert systems, early neural nets, <br>
etc.<br>
<br>
<br>
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..<br>
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
archives: 5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
1/2003 thru 6/2021 <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>