
<!DOCTYPE html>

<html>

  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">

  </head>

  <body>

    <p>glen wrote: </p>

    <blockquote>

      <p> Or meta-enough to classify all the formalisms (whether in my

        hand or in the bush). It feels a bit like (my misunderstandings

        of) Gisin's arguments:

        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Gisin">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Gisin</a>

      </p>

    </blockquote>

    <p>Interesting (to me) that I am just now trying to wade myself

      (with a snorkel?) through the canon of post 1990 QM/QT but

      starting (over) with Bell's inequality and trying to build a

      better foundation for my current house-of-cards understanding.   I

      haven't made it to Gisen yet...   seems like this aspect of his

      thinking has implications for the conversation at hand:</p>

    <p><a

href="https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-time-really-flow-new-clues-come-from-a-century-old-approach-to-math-20200407/"

        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-time-really-flow-new-clues-come-from-a-century-old-approach-to-math-20200407/</a><br>

    </p>

  </body>

</html>