<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>DaveW -</p>
    <p>Well said (IMO)...  I'm a pretty well practiced (but lame)
      meditator myself, which might be why "go to hell" gets through my
      satorial facade.   If I am approaching enlightenment, it is
      asymptotically and more aptly perhaps "Satori and I are
      approaching one another" to use David Bohm's "rheomode" idiom? 
      When we meet out there on the horizon of max-entropy others will
      probably call it (brain? soul?) death.    This is the only thing
      on MY bucket list.  Or more aptly it is the bucket which I seek to
      kick and be kicked by?<br>
    </p>
    <p>I believe (with confidence but little conviction) that there is
      something important in the holonomic "stack" of evolution in this
      "flaw" you point out. </p>
    <p> It is the ability to be self-contained, focused, un-manipulable
      which makes us what we are, makes us capable as independent
      strongly self-actualized agents.  But it is contrarily, our
      ability to be manipulated, or entrainability, etc. which then
      makes us capable of participating in higher order self-organized
      complex adaptive systems... it is what makes us tribal, social,
      cultural, civilizational, eusocial.   For the narrow optimization
      of an individual agent's "goals" it is a bug, not a feature, but
      for the collective emergent system it is a feature not a bug.   <br>
    </p>
    <p>Naturally the experiments of Soviet and then echoing, Chinese
      Communism/Socialism and the many satellite eddies that spun off
      from them turned out to have some acute limits which lead them to
      ultimately precess their way to a phase-change boundary, a
      bifurcation point, a saddle point.   </p>
    <p>We, the democratic free-market sub-species (Post monarchal W
      Europe, Post-Empire British Commnwealth, the American States) have
      also precessed away from the ideals we formed around and cling to
      today (Make 'Murrica Great Some More Forever Goddamit, even if we
      have to kill everyone else and it kills us too!) and onto the cusp
      (IMO) of a saddle in the iterated map that is
      sociopoliticaleconomicreligiotechno humanity.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>Modern self-reinforcing technology (has come in spurts from
      neolithics to ML running on global, distributed, connected,
      ubiquitous "computronium".</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p><i>Computronium being the stuff Data Centers are condensing
          into that currently looks like buildings of rooms of racks of
          trays of slots filled with boards of chips of LSIs of
          transistors of molecules sucking in electrical power and
          pouring out heat-entropy for the purpose of "organizing and
          re-organizing the hell out of the corpus of extant (digitized)
          human knowledge, and making cryptoGarchs richer".  </i></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Who/what do we "become" next?  I think *we* are already a
      collective superorganism (glen has voted for "no more than a slime
      mold") and it is that collective super-organism's evolution that
      is in play and it is our subvenience which facilitates that but no
      longer drives it?   As a "single cell" in the emergent
      super-organism in question, I feel blessed to be here to "observe"
      (and minimally co-evolve) with it in our mutual
      sub/super-venience?</p>
    <p>I should probably rewrite this as a poem.   It is definitely a
      Yarn both in the sense of EricS' recent invokation and in that of
      <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyson_Yunkaporta">Tyson
        Yunkaporta</a> methinks?<br>
    </p>
    <p>- SteveS<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/18/25 6:46 AM, Prof David West
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:975cd493-2011-4c53-b3b8-9817aa3046eb@app.fastmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <title></title>
      <style type="text/css"></style>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">Nick,</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">A partial reclamation is possible.</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">In software I deal with a
        closed-deterministic system and I define a specific protocol for
        an object: the set of messages to which it can and is willing to
        respond, along with the defined response. In the world of
        software I forbid one object managing/controlling another
        despite the fact that the default assumption behind every
        program is some kind of hierarchical control (even in parallel
        programming). I can provide all kinds of arguments as to why
        this is bad and non-control is good, in programming, but you are
        not really interested in that realm.</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">As to a person. We have a wide
        ranging 'protocol' of messages we will, often without
        consideration or consent, respond to. Most of those we picked up
        non-consciously from parents  and culture. This wide range
        protocol does make humans subject to manipulation. </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">It is possible to expand the
        protocol and thereby increase the potential for manipulation and
        control. The "you're going to Hell if you don't stop X" message
        would be an example. We do this with domesticated animals such
        that a dog, for example, will respond to 'beg', 'shake', and
        'roll over'. (If Pavlov rang his bell in front of a wolf, the
        "here's lunch" message would likely manipulate the wolf to more
        than salivation.)</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">But it also possible to self-alter
        your protocol. I simply will not respond to the "go to hell"
        message, for example.</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">If we substitute "messages" for
        "cues" we are pretty much in agreement.</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">We can even get to Zen together:<i>
          "cues to an environment that isn't" </i>is just Maya, the
        world of illusion. A little meditation and you too can become
        "immune" to all those cues/messages and achieve Satori
        (enlightenment).</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;">davew</div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <div>On Tue, Jun 17, 2025, at 11:32 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:</div>
      <blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style="">
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);">Dave, 
          Thanks for responding.  I hoped that my ".... objects and
          environments [ahem]..." might catch your attention.  This post
          was my attempt to respond to the intense pressure I feel from
          EricS and Glen to be more forthright and self-conscious about
          my metaphysics — by which I mean the things I think before I
          start thinking.. </div>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
        </div>
        <blockquote
style="margin-left:0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-width:3px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(200, 200, 200);">
          <div class="qt-elementToProof" style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span
              class="font" style="font-family:Arial;"><span class="size"
                style="font-size:11pt;"><b><i>Two big differences: I do
                    not distinguish between objects and "environments"
                    and no object is allowed to "manage," "control,"
                    "manipulate," or "violate the encapsulation" of any
                    other object</i></b></span></span><span class="font"
              style="font-family:Arial;"><span class="size"
                style="font-size:12pt;">.</span></span><span
              class="font"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span
                class="size" style="font-size:12pt;"> </span></span></div>
        </blockquote>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);">Every
          time I have heard you talk about "object-oriented programming"
          I have felt that there has probably been some illicit traffic
          between behaviorism and programming languages that would
          reward  examination.  But first I want to try and rescue
          "management" from the zone of things about which we disagree
          and put it firmly in the zone of things about which we agree. 
          When I manage you, I don't violate your encapsulation.  I
          don't change the set of if I then O rules that constitute your
          "insides".  On the contrary, I provide you with inputs that,
          given your design, will produce outputs designed by MY needs,
          rather than yours.  This is the sense in which much management
          proceeds by deception.  We all respond to our environment on
          the basis of cues.  If I can provide you with the cues to an
          environment that isn't, then I can get you to respond in ways
          you wouldn't otherwise.   That principle is deeply embedded in
          ethology and also in control system theory.  Before we carry
          this discussion further, I wonder if we do in fact agree on
          that.</div>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);">Thanks
          for your charity and close reading.</div>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);">Nick </div>
        <div class="qt-elementToProof"
style="font-family:Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
        </div>
        <div id="qt-appendonsend"><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%;"><br>
        </div>
        <div id="qt-divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr">
          <div><span class="font"
              style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"><span
                class="color" style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);"><b>From:</b>
                Friam <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam-bounces@redfish.com"><friam-bounces@redfish.com></a> on behalf of
                Prof David West <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:profwest@fastmail.fm"><profwest@fastmail.fm></a><br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:53 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com">friam@redfish.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:friam@redfish.com"><friam@redfish.com></a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [FRIAM] Movement vs. Behavior, and
                what's in the Black Box</span></span></div>
          <div> </div>
        </div>
        <div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">Nick,</div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">I have never heard you state
            your behaviorism in quite this way:<i> "I think that
              behaviorism is a way carving the world into objects and
              environments (ahem) and that rocks behave.  Then the
              distinction beween rocks and organisms would emerge as a
              distinction between objeccts that manage their
              environments and objects that dont." </i></div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">It has some seeming parallels
            to definitions/descriptions I frequently borrow from Ludwig
            von Bertalannfy.</div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><i><b>A system (any/every) is
                a set of elements and the relations among them.</b></i></div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><b><i>An element is
                differentiated and defined based on its behavior—its
                "contribution" to the system.</i></b></div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">I use 'Object' as a synonym
            for 'Element', and establish a single way to describe
            objects, be they abstract (an account), an inanimate (copier
            machine), human (in a role), or a software/hardware
            Artifact. The apparent dualism (element — relation) in the
            definition is, in software, is eliminated by embodying
            'relations' in behavioral objects. </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">Two big differences: I do not
            distinguish between objects and "environments" and no object
            is allowed to "manage," "control," "manipulate," or "violate
            the encapsulation" of any other object.</div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">There must be some essential
            differences in our concepts of "Behavior," else we have been
            talking past each other all these many years.</div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;">davew</div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
          <div>On Mon, Jun 16, 2025, at 10:05 AM, Nicholas Thompson
            wrote:</div>
          <blockquote type="cite" id="qt-x_qt" style="">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>Eric,   </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>It's a dead pigeon that we throw out the window.  I
                wouldnt waste a  perfectly good dead duck on such an
                experiment.  </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I cant decide if the dead pigeon is the limit of
                behavior or if is behavior.  I think it is behavior.  I
                think that behaviorism is a way carving the world into
                objects and environments (ahem) and that rocks behave. 
                Then the distinction beween rocks and organisms would
                emerge as a distinction between objeccts that manage
                their environments and objects that dont. </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>n</div>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div
              class="qt-x_qt-gmail_quote qt-x_qt-gmail_quote_container">
              <div dir="ltr" class="qt-x_qt-gmail_attr">On Tue, May 12,
                2020 at 7:07 PM Eric Charles <<a
                  href="mailto:eric.phillip.charles@gmail.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">eric.phillip.charles@gmail.com</a>>
                wrote:</div>
              <blockquote class="qt-x_qt-gmail_quote"
style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex;">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>Jon,</div>
                  <div>This is a great expansion of the issue, and it
                    might take me a bit to build up to an adequate
                    response. </div>
                  <div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr" class="qt-x_qt-gmail_signature">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>You are definitely right that "scale"
                                is one of many dimensions we might look
                                at when evaluating whether or not
                                something is a behavior. The evaluation
                                of whether or not something is behaving
                                involves comparisons, and those
                                comparisons have to be "fair" in some
                                sense that suggests a "domain". For
                                example, if we drop a dead duck out a
                                window, and then agree that falling in
                                that fashion does not evidence behavior,
                                we wouldn't want to then move to a
                                coin-drop in water (where the coin spins
                                and slides erratically, moving down at
                                various speeds) and assert the coin was
                                alive because it's movement didn't look
                                like the dead-duck's movement. </div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>Does that get us anywhere? </div>
                              <div dir="ltr"><br>
                              </div>
                              <div dir="ltr">
                                <div><br>
                                </div>
                                <div>-----------</div>
                                <div dir="ltr">
                                  <div>Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.</div>
                                  <div>Department of Justice -
                                    Personnel <span>Psychologist</span></div>
                                </div>
                                <div>American University - Adjunct
                                  Instructor</div>
                                <div><br>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                              <div dir="ltr"><br>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_quote">
                  <div dir="ltr" class="qt-x_qt-gmail_attr">On Tue, May
                    12, 2020 at 12:58 PM Jon Zingale <<a
                      href="mailto:jonzingale@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">jonzingale@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote:</div>
                  <blockquote class="qt-x_qt-gmail_quote"
style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex;">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">Glen,
                        Eric,</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">I
                        am enjoying how the conversation is developing.
                        The celery</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">example
                        strikes me as being important, but where Glen
                        refers</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">to
                        <i>scale</i> I would speak of <i>domain of
                          definition</i>. That a shift in</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">domain
                        happens to be size, rather than some other
                        contextual</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">specification,
                        may not be what we want. If this isn't the case</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">Glen,
                        please let me know. With respect to Eric's
                        points it seems</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">fair
                        to me to say that a paddle wheel is behaving,
                        but perhaps not</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">in
                        the <i>larger</i> context of the river. The
                        celery is behaving, but not</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">not
                        in the <i>smaller</i> context of capillary
                        action. Here I am using</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">the
                        language of <i>large</i> and <i>small</i>, but
                        perhaps other modalities</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">have
                        a place as well. One can say Nick's behavior
                        appears</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">spontaneously,
                        but in fact was necessitated by something <i>prior</i>.</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">Here
                        an <i>earlier</i> Nick could play the role of
                        the river.</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);"><br>
                      </div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">Frank,</div>
                      <div class="qt-x_qt-gmail_default"
style="font-family:garamond, serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);">Would
                        you say that the mind is as public as RSA
                        encryption?</div>
                    </div>
                    <div>.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-.
                      .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ...</div>
                    <div>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</div>
                    <div>Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
                        href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"> bit.ly/virtualfriam</a></div>
                    <div>unsubscribe <a
href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
                        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a></div>
                    <div>archives: <a
                        href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
                        http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a></div>
                    <div>FRIAM-COMIC <a
                        href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
                        http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a></div>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <div>.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .-
                  -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ...</div>
                <div>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</div>
                <div>Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  <a
                    href="http://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">
                    bit.ly/virtualfriam</a></div>
                <div>unsubscribe <a
href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a></div>
                <div>archives: <a
                    href="http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
                    http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/</a></div>
                <div>FRIAM-COMIC <a
                    href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                    rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
                    http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a></div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><span class="qt-x_qt-gmail_signature_prefix">--</span></div>
            <div dir="ltr" class="qt-x_qt-gmail_signature">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div>Nicholas S. Thompson</div>
                <div>Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology</div>
                <div>Clark University</div>
                <div><a href="mailto:nthompson@clarku.edu"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext">nthompson@clarku.edu</a></div>
                <div><a href="https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson</a></div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div>.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . /
              .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... .
              ..-. ..- .-..</div>
            <div>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</div>
            <div>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays
              9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a></div>
            <div>to (un)subscribe <a
href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a></div>
            <div>FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a></div>
            <div>archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
                href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a></div>
            <div>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
                href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a></div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div>.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .--
          .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..-
          .-..</div>
        <div>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv</div>
        <div>Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
          Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a></div>
        <div>to (un)subscribe <a
            href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a></div>
        <div>FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a></div>
        <div>archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
            href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a></div>
        <div>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
            href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div style="font-family:Arial;"><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
to (un)subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>