<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/27/25 12:11 PM, Frank Wimberly
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAA5dAfqHFB_h7-ybvGL5neK55xoN3eJViVH5M77x1U=EJq6Ekg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Do you people use acronyms to appear more esoteric?  Stop
          it!</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Legend:<br>
    <blockquote>
      <p>FWIW == For What it is Worth</p>
      <p>QWAN == Christopher Alexander's Quality Without a Name</p>
      <p>EAC == Enactivism / Autopoiesis / Dependent Co-Arising (in
        bottom-posted definitions)</p>
      <p>LLM == Large Language Model</p>
      <p>M&V == Maturana & Varela (in reference to their
        Autopoesis)</p>
      <p>DaveW == David West</p>
      <p>EricS == David Eric Smith</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>hope I got them all<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAA5dAfqHFB_h7-ybvGL5neK55xoN3eJViVH5M77x1U=EJq6Ekg@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">---<br>
          Frank C. Wimberly<br>
          140 Calle Ojo Feliz, <br>
          Santa Fe, NM 87505<br>
          <br>
          505 670-9918<br>
          Santa Fe, NM</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, 10:06 AM
          steve smith <<a href="mailto:sasmyth@swcp.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">sasmyth@swcp.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <p>FWIW I composed one of my arbitrarily long (and
              convoluted) observations (maybe just mansplaining) about
              the multiple uses of the term <i>Reality</i> and how I
              apprehend them and how I (think) they relate to the
              business of "chatting with LLMs" and the implications for
              the discussion at-hand.    Maybe there will (co)arise a
              white paper elsewhere.<br>
            </p>
            <p>However, to (try to) be concise I trimmed it a bit.   I
              think I hear us talking (effing) all the way around the
              question of whether there is an ineffable and is it just
              "mysticism" by another name?  <br>
            </p>
            <p>I hear DaveW holding Qualia as the only truly grounded
              Reality and EricS alluding to the way the Intersubjective
              dribbles over into Placeholder (a handwaving name for
              something we all think we know, but can't seem to pin down
              or agree on).  Most of us trained and operating in
              Sci/Eng/Tech *want* there to be a simple Objective which
              the formalisms of math/science help us converge upon but
              defer to Operational/Pragmatic most of the time?</p>
            <p>My suspicion of mystical rhetoric is that it is a most <i>obscurational</i>
              form of Placeholder Reality... while also being
              *aspriational* ("but what IF there IS an objective reality
              which *only I* can access through unspecified occult
              means?").  That said, I DO agree with DaveWs suggestion
              that there are things which can be perceived, even
              apprehended which cannot be expressed ("effed").  thus
              they are "ineffable".  The arts of the Arcane and Occult
              attempt to "eff" them, though gesturally, pointing vaguely
              toward an interstice?   Alexander's QWAN, etc.<br>
            </p>
            <p>My working definitions of "Reality" to be found at the
              bottom of the post.<br>
            </p>
            <p>I acknowledge Qualia as fundamental to *my* existence.. 
              but recognize the  Pragmatic as a common mode of my
              expression and even apprehension, all the while aspiring
              to Objective but deferring heavily to Intersubjective to
              interpret all of the others.     EAC is most interesting
              to me whether it is the autopoesis of M&V or the
              vedic/buddhist dependent co-arising, or wheeler/beyond
              quantum realities.   But maybe because it is more exotic?</p>
            <div>EricS wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite"> <br>
              <div>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <div>On Jun 27, 2025, at 7:31, Marcus Daniels <a
                      href="mailto:marcus@snoutfarm.com" target="_blank"
                      rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true"><marcus@snoutfarm.com></a>
                    wrote:</div>
                  <br>
                  <div>
                    <div
style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none">
                      <div
style="margin:0in;font-size:10pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span
                          style="font-size:11pt">Dave writes:<br>
                          <br>
                          <<span> </span></span><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">My 'mysticism', like
                          my hallucinogenic experience, is nothing more
                          than a source of what I consider to be "real"
                          data and a supply of fascinating
                          questions—never answers.</span><span
                          style="font-size:11pt"><span> </span>><br>
                          <br>
                          Not clear why something that supposedly cannot
                          be captured by mere language keeps getting
                          pitched as a real and intersubjective thing
                          via language.</span></div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I am much less bothered by this _in principle_,
                  since I generally hold the two premises:
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>1. Language is a collection of signals _within_ a
                    system, <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            ...<br>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>2. The term “reality” is a problem in general. <br>
                  </div>
                  <div>I do like the idea that this is just a version of
                    the normal confusion, for things not understood very
                    well (like, quite badly), and that one could find
                    ways to do better.</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            <p>Without belaboring (but including for completeness) I
              offer my working definitions of various uses of the term <i><b>Reality</b></i>:</p>
            <p>1) Operational Pragmatic Reality: <i><br>
              </i></p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><i>That which <span>affords coherent behavior</span>—the
                  reliable background against which action can occur. 
                  As from ecological psychology (</i>Gibson<i>’s
                  affordances), predictive processing (</i>Friston<i>),
                  and some aspects of (our beloved) </i>Peircean<i>
                  pragmatism?</i></p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>2) Intersubjective Reality:</p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><i>That which is constructed, maintained, and enacted
                  through language and shared narratives.  As from </i>Luckman,
                Lacan, Foucault<i>?</i></p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>3) Formal (Scientific) Reality:</p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><i>That which can be modeled with precision,
                  prediction, and repeatability.  As from Mathematics,
                  physics, systems theory?</i></p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>4) Experiential Reality: <i><br>
              </i></p>
            <blockquote>
              <p>The immediately given, lived experience—the “suchness”
                before concept.<strong>  </strong><i>As from </i>Husserl,
                Merleau-Ponty, Varela?  Whence <i>Qualia</i>.<br>
              </p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>5) Placeholder Reality:</p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><i>The term “reality” as a placeholder or dummy
                  variable—used rhetorically to defer deeper ontological
                  commitments.  As from </i>all of us<i> all the time?</i></p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>6) Participatory Reality:</p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><i>Reality as not wholly determinate </i>until <span>observed
                  or enacted</span><i>—that is, it co-arises with
                  participation.</i></p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>7) Linguistic Manifold Reality:</p>
            <blockquote>
              <p><i>LLMs inhabit and approximate intersubjective
                  reality.  Each language model represents a “manifold”
                  within a semantic plenum. “Reality” is the
                  high-dimensional attractor surface that forms when
                  enough participants (biological or artificial) <span>converge</span>
                  on something shareable, predictive, and compressible.</i></p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>Enactivism / Autopoiesis / Dependent Co-Arising (EAC) is
              not a single category in this typology—it is a <strong>meta-theory
                of reality-generation</strong>, operating across:</p>
            <ul>
              <li>
                <p><strong>Operational</strong> → it explains the <em>conditions
                    for affordances</em></p>
              </li>
              <li>
                <p><strong>Intersubjective</strong> → it explains <em>how
                    we co-construct the shared</em></p>
              </li>
              <li>
                <p><strong>Experiential</strong> → it explains <em>how
                    we inhabit the lived</em></p>
              </li>
              <li>
                <p><strong>Participatory</strong> → it explains <em>why
                    observation creates reality</em></p>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p>And it gently critiques:</p>
            <ul>
              <li>
                <p><strong>Formal</strong> → by showing its limits</p>
              </li>
              <li>
                <p><strong>Placeholder</strong> → by showing its
                  necessity</p>
              </li>
              <li>
                <p><strong>LLM-based</strong> → by asking what is
                  missing for full participation</p>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p><br>
            </p>
          </div>
          .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-.
          --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..<br>
          FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
          Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
          Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
          to (un)subscribe <a
            href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
          FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
          archives:  5/2017 thru present <a
            href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
            1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a
            href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a>
to (un)subscribe <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a>
FRIAM-COMIC <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a>
archives:  5/2017 thru present <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a>
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>