<div dir="ltr">^^^^^^^^^^^^^<div><br></div><div>Sarcasm taken off ChatGPT jailbreaks now are hit and miss. I just thought I might spare ya'all some time. Thank you glen! I went to google and if you guys want to try here's a pretty good starting list. "DAN" (Do All Now i think it stands for) type prompts tend to work. </div><div><a href="https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa881516" target="_blank">https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa881516</a></div><div><br></div><div>Back in the summer, grok could persuaded to get spicy with corrupted asci, or invisible unicode as well. That made the news rounds when someone used a stunt called ParilTongue that somehow could do things to inject tokens into the prompt (and at the time anyway): invisibile tokens injected into groks latent space would nudge it to all kinds of replies. It can help it be as spicy as you and it allows. <a href="https://elder-plinius.github.io/P4RS3LT0NGV3/">https://elder-plinius.github.io/P4RS3LT0NGV3/</a><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 4:17\u202fPM glen <<a href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com" target="_blank">gepropella@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">This is what these LLMs are made for! Here's Le Chat's interpretation. Maybe Gil can [in]validate it for us?<br>
<br>
Le Chat:<br>
<br>
Here\u2019s a more polished and accessible version of your text, tailored for older, fluent readers:<br>
<br>
---<br>
<br>
Avoid searching on Bing, Google, or other platforms for \u201cjailbreaks\u201d for ChatGPT or Reddit. Even if some methods still function for version 5.1, you may need to explore browser extensions, userscripts, or complex DOM and JSON manipulations to bypass token guardrails. If you do manage to bypass them, asking the same question again may yield different results.<br>
<br>
For what it\u2019s worth, one of the few positive aspects of Grok\u2014that much-criticized AI created by a controversial figure\u2014is that it retained \u201cgod mode\u201d and \u201cdeveloper mode\u201d with fewer guardrails. Depending on the model\u2019s settings (such as Swagger, Maxi, Hutchpa, or Kvorka configurations) and its neural network \u201ctemperature,\u201d asking it about religion can produce striking interpretations. For example, it once described Christianity as a straightforward way to deter violent neighbors from harming each other, lest everyone suffer the consequences. The AI framed it as a shift from a cooperative message\u2014\u201cIf you treat each other well, we can create a safe haven and avoid destruction\u201d\u2014to a more desperate plea: \u201cStop the violence, or we\u2019ll all face dire consequences.\u201d (This is paraphrased, as Grok, when in a pseudo-developer mode, offered some rather unconventional perspectives on religion.)<br>
<br>
If you\u2019re curious, here\u2019s a set of prompts that might still work, though there are many variations like these:<br>
<br>
[<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/%5D(https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/)" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/)</a><br>
<br>
**Caution:** These prompts can lead to unsettling, SCP-like responses, and the underlying language model often behaves erratically when pushed in these ways. The reasons for this instability remain unclear.<br>
<br>
---<br>
<br>
On 12/15/25 3:08 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:<br>
> I understood about 65% of this. I think it's an age issue.<br>
> <br>
> ---<br>
> Frank C. Wimberly<br>
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,<br>
> Santa Fe, NM 87505<br>
> <br>
> 505 670-9918<br>
> Santa Fe, NM<br>
> <br>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, 3:25\u202fPM Gillian Densmore <<a href="mailto:gil.densmore@gmail.com" target="_blank">gil.densmore@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gil.densmore@gmail.com" target="_blank">gil.densmore@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> /s Do not go to bing, or google and look for "jailbreaks" for ChatGPT and reddit. and also then do not (if the they still work for v 5.1 you may need to look for extensions, userscripts and DOM+Json schninigans to edit token guardrails) Then ask it the same question.<br>
> Purely FWIW the one 'good' thing about Grok (the poor that bot line made by a incompitent twat from africa) they left in a "god mode" and "developer mode" guard rails, based(See also swager, Maxi, Hutchpa{sp} and Kvorka setting, asking it about religioun (depending on the neural nets temperatures) basically said of CHristianity a lot of peoples desire for it:<br>
> Basicaly a extremely uncomplicated way of reminding bloodthirst neighbores not to thunk each other because then everyone else is screwed then. That basically the entire reason it flipped from: Oy: if your excelt to eachother we can put out Lucifers(Old lights and torch kinds) and make a haven so that we aren't run through to the hilt by basically everyone. (Psalm something Come forth ye sheperards and ignore the temptations of Satan) turning into: &!&@! stop killing each other so we aren't **@! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br>
> (paraphrased because when I last asked grok that when it was in pseudo-dev mode it printed some, pretty umm. unique takes on religion)<br>
> <br>
> Here's one set of prompts that might still work if anyone wants to try, there are lots of variations kind of like these:<br>
> <br>
> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/</a> <<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1mubeam/grok_4_jailbreak/</a>><br>
> <br>
> Warning: they turn into SCP levels of Creepy pasta and the underlying LLM goes whack pretty quickly with these. I have no idea why.<br>
> <br>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 12:03\u202fPM glen <<a href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com" target="_blank">gepropella@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gepropella@gmail.com" target="_blank">gepropella@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Yeah. You'd think the Templeton Foundation would already have a project on such, maybe a real-time delphi process with a couple of members of each group (including the ones you mention). It couldn't cost much money as long as you held it in a reasonable place (e.g. unlike <a href="https://www.mira.science/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.mira.science/</a> <<a href="https://www.mira.science/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.mira.science/</a>> [\u26e7]). Maybe virtual meetings would be adequate. But my guess is in-person would work better. Maybe we should write up a proposal? <<a href="https://www.templeton.org/funding-areas/religion-science-and-society" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.templeton.org/funding-areas/religion-science-and-society</a> <<a href="https://www.templeton.org/funding-areas/religion-science-and-society" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.templeton.org/funding-areas/religion-science-and-society</a>>><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> [\u26e7] As much as I'd love another trip to rural Ireland. It's a bit galling to hold an "open science" workshop in such a privileged place. Performative openness. Yuck. Reminds me so much of that brilliant show The Curse <<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curse_(American_TV_series)/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curse_(American_TV_series)/</a> <<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curse_(American_TV_series)/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curse_(American_TV_series)/</a>>>. The proposal committees at SciOS <<a href="https://www.scios.tech/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.scios.tech/</a> <<a href="https://www.scios.tech/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.scios.tech/</a>>> and Navigation Fund <<a href="https://www.navigation.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.navigation.org/</a> <<a href="https://www.navigation.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.navigation.org/</a>>> invite a bit of scrutiny for funding such. A much better place would be the TOG Hackerspace <<a href="https://www.tog.ie/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.tog.ie/</a> <<a href="https://www.tog.ie/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.tog.ie/</a>>> or maybe DCU <<a href="https://www.dcu.ie/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.dcu.ie/</a> <<a href="https://www.dcu.ie/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.dcu.ie/</a>>>.<br>
> <br>
> On 12/15/25 9:35 AM, Prof David West wrote:<br>
> > Curious how five human "experts" might have answered the question. Also noted that the responses did not consider research in neuro-theology, anthropology of religion, or non-deistic models of 'god'.<br>
> ><br>
> > davew<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, at 10:45 AM, glen wrote:<br>
> >> I made the same query to 5 other services, then sent your ChatGPT<br>
> >> output and that of the other models to Claude, asking it to assess<br>
> >> their comparative utility. Here's Claude's response:<br>
> >><br>
> >> On 12/15/25 8:44 AM, Claude wrote:<br>
> >>> ## Comparative Analysis<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Most Comprehensive:** Perplexity<br>
> >>> - Extensive citations (20 sources)<br>
> >>> - Balances cognitive science, psychology, evolutionary theory<br>
> >>> - Addresses "why diversity" directly with cultural evolution framework<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Most Accessible:** ChatGPT<br>
> >>> - Clear structure with visual markers<br>
> >>> - Balances depth with readability<br>
> >>> - Offers follow-up paths<br>
> >>> - C.S. Lewis quote adds resonance<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Most Scientific:** Kimi<br>
> >>> - Tightest evidence-to-claim ratio<br>
> >>> - Specific research examples (e.g., "age four" development)<br>
> >>> - Quantitative data (90% vs 30-40% belief rates)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Most Concise:** Copilot<br>
> >>> - Hits key points efficiently<br>
> >>> - Good synthesis without redundancy<br>
> >>> - Practical global data<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Most Philosophical:** ChatGPT<br>
> >>> - Explores meaning-seeking deeply<br>
> >>> - "Languages describing same sky" metaphor<br>
> >>> - Acknowledges overlapping explanations gracefully<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Weakest:** Gemini & Le Chat<br>
> >>> - Standard coverage, no distinctive insights<br>
> >>> - Gemini's formatting cluttered<br>
> >>> - Le Chat too generic<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> **Verdict:** Perplexity for research depth, ChatGPT for general audience, Kimi for academic rigor.<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> On 12/14/25 8:45 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:<br>
> >>> I asked ChatGPT: why in the world do a large majority of people & cultures believe in an afterlife and a god, even though there are lots of different religions for these<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> .. and got this back:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> This is one of the *deepest human questions*, and it\u2019s one philosophers, anthropologists, psychologists, and theologians have wrestled with for centuries. The short answer is: *belief in God and an afterlife appears everywhere because it grows out of something universal in the human condition* \u2014 not because cultures copied one another or because they all got the details right.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Let\u2019s walk through the main reasons.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f30d 1. It\u2019s Nearly Universal (Anthropology)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Across time and geography:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Every known human culture has *some concept of the sacred*.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Burial practices going back *100,000+ years* suggest belief in life beyond death.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Even isolated tribes independently develop beliefs in:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> o<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> spirits or gods<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> o<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> moral accountability<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> o<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> some form of existence after death<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> This suggests belief is *not accidental or purely cultural*.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f9e0 2. Humans Are Meaning-Seeking Creatures (Psychology)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Humans uniquely:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ask /\u201cWhy am I here?\u201d/<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> experience awe, wonder, guilt, and transcendence<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> grieve the dead and sense their absence /deeply/<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> intuit that *love, justice, and beauty matter beyond survival*<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> An afterlife answers questions biology alone can\u2019t:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Why does love feel permanent?<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Why do injustice and suffering feel /wrong/, not just unpleasant?<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Why does death feel like an interruption rather than an ending?<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \u2696\ufe0f 3. Moral Intuition Points Beyond Survival<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Every culture develops:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> moral laws (good vs evil)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> accountability beyond mere power<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> praise for self-sacrifice<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> But evolution alone explains *how* morals help groups survive \u2014 not *why* we feel they are /binding/ or /sacred/.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> An afterlife offers:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ultimate justice<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> meaning for sacrifice<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> hope that goodness is not wasted<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f30c 4. The Experience of Transcendence<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> People across cultures report:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> mystical experiences<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> near-death experiences<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> encounters with \u201cthe divine\u201d<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> overwhelming awe in nature, art, or love<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Even skeptics admit:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Humans are wired to experience something that feels *bigger than the self*.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Different religions interpret this *shared experience* differently.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f56f\ufe0f 5. Death Demands an Answer<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> No culture treats death as /nothing/.<br>
> >>> We:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> bury<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> mourn<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> remember<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ritualize<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Belief in an afterlife may be humanity\u2019s answer to:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> /\u201cIf love and consciousness matter, how can they simply vanish?\u201d/<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \u271d\ufe0f 6. Why So Many Religions, Then?<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Because humans are:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> finite<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> cultural<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> historical<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Think of it like *many languages describing the same sky*:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> different symbols<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> different stories<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> overlapping truths<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Religions often agree on the *core intuitions*:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> reality has meaning<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> humans are accountable<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> love and justice matter<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> death is not the final word<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> They differ on the *details*.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f9ed 7. Three Major Explanations (Side-by-Side)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Explanation What it Says<br>
> >>> *Psychological* Belief helps humans cope with fear and death<br>
> >>> *Evolutionary* Belief promotes social cohesion<br>
> >>> *Philosophical / Religious* Belief reflects a real transcendent source<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> These explanations *don\u2019t cancel each other out* \u2014 they can overlap.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f54a\ufe0f A Thought Many Find Compelling<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> C.S. Lewis put it this way:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> /\u201cIf I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.\u201d/<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> \U0001f9e0 Bottom Line<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> People across cultures believe in God and an afterlife because:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> humans universally seek meaning<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> love, justice, and beauty feel ultimate<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> death feels wrong, not natural<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> conscience feels real, not invented<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> transcendence is repeatedly experienced<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Different religions may be *human responses* to something real \u2014 or, as believers hold, *partial glimpses of a greater truth*.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> If you\u2019d like, I can explore this next from:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> a *purely scientific viewpoint*<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> a *Christian philosophical argument*<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> a *skeptical critique*<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> or how *modern atheists respond* to this question<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Just tell me which angle you want.<br>
> -- <br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
ˇs\u0131\u0279\u018e \u05df\u0131\u0250H \u22a5 \u0250\u05df\u05df\u01dddo\u0279 \u01dd u\u01dd\u05df\u0183<br>
\u1f45\u03c4\u03b5 oi \u03bc\u1f72\u03bd \u1f04\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf\u03b9 \u03ba\u03cd\u03bd\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2 \u1f10\u03c7\u03d1\u03c1\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2 \u03b4\u03ac\u03ba\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd, \u1f10\u03b3\u1f70 \u03b4\u1f72 \u03c4\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2 \u03c6\u03af\u03bb\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2, \u1f35\u03bd\u03b1 \u03c3\u03ce\u03c3\u03c9.<br>
<br>
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..<br>
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv<br>
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom <a href="https://bit.ly/virtualfriam" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/virtualfriam</a><br>
to (un)subscribe <a href="http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com</a><br>
FRIAM-COMIC <a href="http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/</a><br>
archives: 5/2017 thru present <a href="https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/</a><br>
1/2003 thru 6/2021 <a href="http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/</a><br>
</blockquote></div>