
<!DOCTYPE html>

<html>

  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">

  </head>

  <body>

    <br>

    <blockquote type="cite"

cite="mid:MN0PR11MB5985BB418CDED352536E7AEBC598A@MN0PR11MB5985.namprd11.prod.outlook.com">

      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">

      <meta name="Generator"

        content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">

      <style>@font-face

        {font-family:"Cambria Math";

        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face

        {font-family:Calibri;

        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face

        {font-family:Aptos;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

        {margin:0in;

        font-size:12.0pt;

        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink

        {mso-style-priority:99;

        color:blue;

        text-decoration:underline;}span.EmailStyle19

        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;

        font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;

        color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault

        {mso-style-type:export-only;

        font-size:10.0pt;

        mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1

        {page:WordSection1;}</style>

      <div class="WordSection1">

        <p class="MsoNormal">Experimentally, another reason to delete

          thread context from postings:  Is the response to a prompt

          naīve or does it demonstrate meaning making?</p>

      </div>

    </blockquote>

    Some of the most terse (nod to you and a few others) responses here

    offer the most (pregnant/latent) meaning?   

  </body>

</html>