<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto">I discussed a Damasio book with Gemini and we ended up wondering if we can create a chain complex/cohomology for thought itself<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">+ Emotions reflects the needs of biological body in a physical environment </div><div dir="auto">+ \u200bFeelings reflect those internal biological states</div><div dir="auto">+ \u200bSpeech reflects feelings in structured form</div><div dir="auto">+ Thought reflects speech </div><div dir="auto">+ \u200bAI reflects human thoughts on a global scale</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">But I am not sure this is fruitful. Full thread here</div><div dir="auto">https://share.gemini.google/bmUYuyhQT33U</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-J.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br></div><div align="left" dir="auto" style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Jon Zingale <jonzingale@gmail.com> </div><div>Date: 8/3/26 11:02 PM (GMT+01:00) </div><div>To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> </div><div>Subject: [FRIAM] Cohomology from Beltrami-Laplace </div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333" class="gmail_default"><span style="background-color:transparent">Fwiw, where I'm at...<br><br></span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI0DYD2FhtE">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI0DYD2FhtE</a><br><br><span style="background-color:transparent"></span></div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333" class="gmail_default">or probably more accurately:<br><br><a href="https://www.stat.uchicago.edu/~lekheng/work/psapm.pdf">https://www.stat.uchicago.edu/~lekheng/work/psapm.pdf</a></div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333" class="gmail_default"><a href="https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~bishop/classes/math638.F20/Canzani_Laplacian_Notes.pdf">https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~bishop/classes/math638.F20/Canzani_Laplacian_Notes.pdf</a></div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333" class="gmail_default">Except, not in the domain of physics of course. Some on list may have done the work before (or recently) of recovering proper geometry from what otherwise is a dearth of isospectral properties. I would love to know who out there might be worth having a discussion with regarding such techniques, limitations and frontiers.</div></div>
</body></html>